# Codemagic Reviews 2026. Verified Reviews, Pros & Cons | Capterra

> Is Codemagic the right Continuous Integration solution for you? Explore 124 verified user reviews from people in industries like yours to make a confident choice.

Source: https://www.capterra.com/p/152573/Nevercode/reviews

---

Codemagic

4.7 (124)

[View alternatives](https://www.capterra.com/p/152573/Nevercode/alternatives/)

Provider data verified by our Software Research team, and reviews moderated by our Reviews Verification team. [Learn more](https://www.capterra.com/our-story/)

* * *

Last updated March 13th, 2026

# Reviews of Codemagic

Ease of use

4.6

Customer Service

4.6

## Pros and Cons in Reviews

IS

Ignacio S

Real Estate AgentReal Estate, 2 - 10 employeesUsed the software for: More than 2 years.

“I love Codemagic's simple build and development tools that make it easy to automate tests and provide stable property apps with fast cloud service integration and rapid deployments.“

October 18, 2025

IR

Ivan R

Software EngineerInformation Technology and Services, 2 - 10 employeesUsed the software for: Less than 6 months.

“No support at all.“

August 19, 2024

Joseph M

Senior DeveloperComputer Software, 501 - 1,000 employeesUsed the software for: More than 2 years.

“I also value the degree of customisation that is offered because it enables me to modify the platform to suit my particular requirements.“

May 14, 2023

GP

Greg P

iOS EngineerFinancial Services, 201 - 500 employeesUsed the software for: Less than 6 months.

“Some minor issues, like when I connect new repository into codemagic it was not fetching codemagic.yaml and I needed to refresh and try to add it again.“

July 28, 2022

Maria Cecilia B

Senior Quality Assurance ManagerIndustrial Automation, 501 - 1,000 employeesUsed the software for: Less than 6 months.

“It offered great support to integrate our iOS, Ionic and Flutter app projects in CI/CD pipelines, making it a great tool for mobile app projects.“

February 18, 2023

Ivo B

Software EngineerFinancial Services, 11 - 50 employeesUsed the software for: 6-12 months.

“Lately webhook events are sometimes processed out of order when you have multiple coming in (for example you push to a branch with an open PR, which triggers a hook for both the push and the P{R update).“

July 1, 2021

NH

Niklas H

Co-FounderCosmetics, 2 - 10 employeesUsed the software for: Less than 6 months.

“You do not have to worry about building your apps, configuring it for productive use, and uploading it to the app stores. While most of our requirements can be fulfilled with the workflow editor, all others could be solved using the scripts before or after each step.“

July 4, 2021

JG

Julian G

Mobile DeveloperComputer Software, Self-employedUsed the software for: I used a free trial.

“I don't think this has to do directly with codemagic. But sometimes the debugging process is a bit tricky. When the software compiles on your local machine and codemagic is nearly setup up the same, there can still be issues in the build process.“

July 27, 2021

## Showing most helpful reviews

Showing 1-25 of 124 Reviews

Sort by:

Most Helpful

Rating

Company Size

Reviewer's Role

Length of Use

Frequency of Use

Ivo B.  
Software Engineer  
Financial Services  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "Overall Good CI/CD for Flutter"

July 1, 2021

5.0

We needed a CI to build and publish a Flutter app for Android and iOS to both stores as well as Firebase App Distribution. Bitbucket Pipelines doesn't offer Mac machines so we chose something Flutter-specific to not have to worry about Flutter setup in CI. The good pre-configuration of the build machines as well as publishing tools saved us a lot of time in setting up the CI.

Pros

Good integration with Bitbucket, easy to use UI to set up CI jobs. Mac machines with everything preinstalled to do Flutter testing, build and releases. Allows auto-cancelling of previous builds if new commits are pushed. Especially App Store Connect helpers were very welcome since we didn't have much experience with publishing iOS apps. Newer Yaml configuration option also works well and can of course be versioned with the rest of the app.

Cons

Lately webhook events are sometimes processed out of order when you have multiple coming in (for example you push to a branch with an open PR, which triggers a hook for both the push and the P{R update). That can lead to the wrong builds being auto-cancelled and a bit of confusion as to whats happening. Sometime issues with retrieving build logs. Dark mode could use more contrast. Linux machines still lack cache support. All in all only minor issues though.

Alternatives considered

[Bitbucket](https://www.capterra.com/p/233341/Bitbucket/)

Reason for choosing Codemagic

We're using Bitbucket for our repos but it's CI services does not support Mac machines so we needed something that did. Codemagic did also also offered a lot of other convenience features.

Review Source

DA

Diaferia A.  
Marketing Associate  
Individual & Family Services  
Used the software for: 1-2 years

### "Codemagic for Reliable Mobile App Development "

November 17, 2024

5.0

Codemagic generates a reliable business performance in mobile development

Pros

Codemagic delivers a satisfactory mobile development services

Cons

Codemagic outlines a friendly assistance and support

Switched from

[JAVAT 365](https://www.capterra.com/p/248708/Javat-365/)[Codenvy](https://www.capterra.com/p/140776/Codenvy-Developer-Workspaces/)[Booknetic](https://www.capterra.com/p/230353/Booknetic/)

The incompetence of these applications is something discouraging

Review Source

IR

Ivan R.  
Software Engineer  
Information Technology and Services  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Worst support for worst product"

August 19, 2024

1.0

They wasted three days of my time, but with no result at all. Product is worthless

Pros

There is nothing to like about this product.

Cons

No support at all. Documentation is faulty.

Review Source

Enes C.  
DevOps  
Computer Games  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "Unity CI/CD"

June 1, 2022

5.0

We have faster build times. It is more secure than Jenkins. Very easy to setup for developers and other team members.

Pros

We were having a hard time building our games on Jenkins and codemagic came to the rescue. We can take concurrent builds at the same time for iOS, since it's a SaaS we don't have to manage the platform. It's very easy to use and set up. Pretty cheap when you compare it with the other platforms.

Cons

You can store your codemagic.yaml file on the website so you always have to have it on your repository.

Alternatives considered

[CircleCI](https://www.capterra.com/p/150380/CircleCI/)[Bitrise](https://www.capterra.com/p/178004/Bitrise/)

Reason for choosing Codemagic

It's cheaper and Unity is pre-installed on the codemagic.

Switched from

[Jenkins](https://www.capterra.com/p/171026/Jenkins/)

It's 2022

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Android Developer  
Computer Software  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "Magic bullet for mobile CI/CD"

July 3, 2021

4.0

Pros

The UI configuration wizard is one of the coolest thing of the whole system. Also, 1st class Flutter projects support is something I was looking for.

Cons

There is no way to easily do a feature request or contact support, since Codemagic pushes users to their Slack community instead of giving a chance to just contact the right person. Also, after using Bitrise for quite some time it feels like Codemagic misses some additional predefined steps for configuration.

Alternatives considered

[CircleCI](https://www.capterra.com/p/150380/CircleCI/)[Bitrise](https://www.capterra.com/p/178004/Bitrise/)

Switched from

[Bitrise](https://www.capterra.com/p/178004/Bitrise/)

Had issues with configuring iOS builds of my Flutter project on Bitrise

Review Source

James D.  
Founder  
Computer Software  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "A truly wonderful, modern CI"

July 9, 2021

5.0

Pros

The first thing that struck me about Codemagic is that it looks and feels like a modern tool. Many of the competing softwares in the space have a terrible user experience, which makes you immediately shiver when you first open them. Codemagic is quite the opposite. The user interface is clean and the platform is very configurable considering. I've found builds to be fairly quick and the platform stable. They do a great job of rolling out updates consistently.

Cons

While the interface is great, I think there could be some improvement in terms of how projects are laid out. Overall, very minor.

Alternatives considered

[CircleCI](https://www.capterra.com/p/150380/CircleCI/)[Codefresh](https://www.capterra.com/p/156336/Codefresh/)[Bitrise](https://www.capterra.com/p/178004/Bitrise/)

Reason for choosing Codemagic

Codemagic had the best blend of modern tooling while still being highly configurable.

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Senior iOS Engineer  
Marketing and Advertising  
Used the software for: 1-2 years

### "Competent platform for iOS"

July 1, 2021

5.0

Pros

We had an ready transition from our last tool. In the past, changing platforms has been an ordeal.

Cons

Many features are Flutter centric. Sometimes the docs aren't clear that something is specifically for flutter builds, and other platforms feel second class.

Alternatives considered

[CircleCI](https://www.capterra.com/p/150380/CircleCI/)

Reason for choosing Codemagic

We had trouble getting successful builds from circle.

Review Source

David G.  
CTO  
Health, Wellness and Fitness  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "Best CI for Flutter"

July 1, 2021

5.0

Excellent. Not only from a tech, value proposition point of view, but only from a customer service. The slack channel the use for that is an excellent idea.

Pros

It's a CI specific for flutter ecosystem, so you have every option you need for that platform and stack, and no option you don't need.

Cons

The (extremely rare) ocasional instability of a company starting up. Nothing to worry about.

Alternatives considered

[CircleCI](https://www.capterra.com/p/150380/CircleCI/)

Reason for choosing Codemagic

It's specific for flutter, unlike the other options we checked in the market.

Switched from

[Semaphore](https://www.capterra.com/p/171934/Semaphore/)

Not mobile / flutter specific

Review Source

Ryan E.  
Sr. Software Engineer  
Computer Software  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "A great CI/CD tool"

July 30, 2021

4.0

Overall, there is no better combination of price and developer experience. Tools like GitHub Actions are powerful but require more configuration and are probably better suited for larger teams.

Pros

Ease of use - essentially low maintenance once it is set up. Developer experience Great customer support Competitive pricing

Cons

Currently no static analysis or support for code coverage. Reporting on failed tests could also be better. In the past I have had issues with Apple Dev Console authentication. Mac Mini instances can also be slow at times.

Alternatives considered

[GitHub](https://www.capterra.com/p/129067/GitHub/)[CircleCI](https://www.capterra.com/p/150380/CircleCI/)[Travis CI](https://www.capterra.com/p/179183/Travis-CI/)[GitLab](https://www.capterra.com/p/159806/GitLab/)[Bitrise](https://www.capterra.com/p/178004/Bitrise/)

Reason for choosing Codemagic

Ease of use and developer experience. Other solutions may be more performant and cheaper, but they severely lack in terms of developer experience.

Review Source

IS

Ignacio S.  
Real Estate Agent  
Real Estate  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "Fast app development and cloud testing for real estate."

October 18, 2025

4.0

Codemagic assisted me in rapidly developing and testing applications for client access and listing control, streamlining coding so my agency could speed up the release of new services.

Pros

I love Codemagic's simple build and development tools that make it easy to automate tests and provide stable property apps with fast cloud service integration and rapid deployments.

Cons

It took additional effort to understand some complex test management tasks, and intermittent bugs or service downtime interrupted our development during property database updates.

Review Source

DA

Daniel A.  
Application Developer - Senior II  
Veterinary  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "Codemagic is truly Magic"

June 30, 2021

5.0

We had a CI/CD solution setup for a new Flutter app in less than a week which has enabled us to build an entire app within 5 months from start to finish and achieve a tight feedback loop with testers and stakeholders. The customer support quality and responsiveness is unparalleled.

Pros

The ability to get a Flutter app built and deployed is so simple and streamlined that even non-developers can define their own workflows to suit their needs.

Cons

The UI can be a little difficult to navigate at times and find certain features.

Review Source

JA

Juan A.  
Software Consultant  
Computer Software  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "Works for you, and not against you."

July 2, 2021

5.0

Never had any issues, and it's my go-to CI/CD for mobile apps. Period. Even in clients where they have already something setup, those solutions always have hiccups, fail time to time, and then we end-up using CodeMagic.

Pros

Multiple workflows on the same branch. Flutter out of the box. Multiple distribution mechanism on the same build

Cons

Device testing farm, so we can test on real devices would be great, although understandably will not be cheap.

Alternatives considered

[Bitrise](https://www.capterra.com/p/178004/Bitrise/)

Reason for choosing Codemagic

Ease of use and price.

Review Source

TSL

Teh Sunn L.  
Founder  
Information Technology and Services  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Codemagic is all you need to Build and Deploy your product Automatically!"

August 13, 2021

5.0

I'm very satisfied with Codemagic. Build and deploying the app manually is a big pain when you have multiple projects and Codemagic does it all with ease. I'm planning to set up all my projects on Codemagic so I don't have to care about building and deploying my apps manually.

Pros

The feature which I liked the most is the functionality to add the self-hosted repository to Codemagic. Since we always had a self-hosted git repository, Codemagic was the perfect fit for our use case.

Cons

Logs are a little difficult to find especially when there's a lot of warnings and then an error in between. If the logs can have color codes it will be perfect. And I also wish that Codemagic could support IPv6. This will help lots of people to test Codemagic on a self-hosted git repository, at their home.

Review Source

KR

Kris R.  
CTO  
Computer Software  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "Ultimate Flutter Mobile App Deployment Time Saver"

June 29, 2021

5.0

Codemagic has taken away the most unpleasant tasks our app development studio had, and saved us thousands of dollars in staff costs in our first year of using it.

Pros

The little details of deployment to the app stores, with Google Play and especially Apple changing things every few months, meant that releasing a new version of an app always had an overhead of adjusting things, maybe changing versions of things in the local environment, to get the build and the upload and the publish steps to work. Codemagic takes care of 99% of this overhead for us. It has all but removed completely one of our most unenjoyable tasks as mobile app developers.

Cons

The cost is a little higher than I would love - and by that I mean, had they figured out their costing before we signed up, we might not have chosen it. Having said that - and this is so important - it is EXCELLENT value for money - it much more than pays for itself in the developer time saved on app deployment tasks.

Reason for choosing Codemagic

We did a thorough analysis of the available products in the market. Codemagic stood out for price at the time, also for easy of use. I would still choose Codemagic today for both the time & money saving it provides, and also for the excellent customer service.

Review Source

IO

Ignacio O.  
Head of Technology  
Computer Software  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "Good but not great"

June 29, 2021

4.0

Pros

It does the job and that's enough to continue using it!

Cons

Flexibility. For example, we use a monorepo, so every time backend changes are pushed, a new build start, and that's not good.

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Software Engineer  
Computer Software  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "Great tool for our flutter development"

July 1, 2021

5.0

Pros

Codemagic supports Flutter which is great. It was really easy to get started and we had the pipeline running in second. Not only building but it was able to push apps to app stores which was really handy and helped us quickly deploy our apps. The free tier is generous.

Cons

No teams on the free tier but that is understandable.

Reason for choosing Codemagic

None has all in one and seamless integration with Flutter like Codemagic.

Switched from

[GitLab](https://www.capterra.com/p/159806/GitLab/)

No flutter integration.

Review Source

AA

Aashish A.  
Senior Mobile App Developer  
Information Technology and Services  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "Code magic is best for CI/CD for mobile application."

July 19, 2021

4.0

Pros

\- It support all major platform for app development. Like Native development in swift, java and kotlin. It also support for flutter developement. - CI and CD option available are best in the merket

Cons

\- Price could be little lower for indie developers, but still it is one of the best available option.

Review Source

MA

Mohamed A.  
Staff Quality Engineer  
Computer Software  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "Automate your apps deployment on Stores with Best Security Coverage"

August 1, 2021

4.0

Finally, its a Great product for individual devs, but needs some extra feature to be used as a team.

Pros

one of the best features is that Codemagic supports Flutter, which make it easier for me to develop my code, also i am using my preferred platform without restrictions to specific one. also its Simple not complicated tool.

Cons

i think they are need the team support for the tool, the support is not the best thing, also there're no branch triggers or Screenshots.

Review Source

SY

Sunil Y.  
Senior Mobile Developer/Architect  
Management Consulting  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "Very good experience while using CodeMagic CI/CD "

July 4, 2021

5.0

Overall very good experience used CodeMagic CI/CD for almost around 35 apps.

Pros

Documentation helped for configuring CI/CD pipeline for native as well as hybrid mobile projects.

Cons

Need some improvements for Github checks in Github enterprise accounts. Already communicated with your core team. If you can provide it will be very helpful for our team.

Review Source

GB

Gustavo B.  
Hybrid Mobile Developer  
Computer Software  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "Best Flutter CI/CD"

June 29, 2021

5.0

Pros

We use daily in our applications to create builds for developers test, debug and evaluate, also to ensure that our QA team has the same application that the final user will have it

Cons

Sometimes you may have some latency between ticket and solution, but we understand that there is a timezone difference

Review Source

NT

Nick T.  
Principal Engineer  
Utilities  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "Easy to use build service"

July 6, 2021

5.0

Overall it's been an awesome product to use. Save us lots of time and money. Great community support. Great support from CodeMagic itself.

Pros

Easy to set up through the web console or as code. Code signing is handled perfectly.

Cons

Debugging is still hard. Role based access set up for team members is not very clear.

Review Source

JG

Julian G.  
Mobile Developer  
Computer Software  
Used the software for: I used a free trial

### "Easiest CI for Flutter"

July 27, 2021

5.0

Pros

Codemagic is easy to setup for any Flutter project. You can integrate your existing repositories in a single click. I love the automation from a git push to the deployment of the app to the customer. The software is very intuitive to setup and has a thorough documentation to get things working quickly.

Cons

I don't think this has to do directly with codemagic. But sometimes the debugging process is a bit tricky. When the software compiles on your local machine and codemagic is nearly setup up the same, there can still be issues in the build process. Those issues are hard to debug, but when fixed it works like a charm again.

Review Source

NH

Niklas H.  
Co-Founder  
Cosmetics  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Makes building and deploying your Flutter apps so much easier"

July 4, 2021

5.0

We solve the problem of having to manually configure our apps for productive use, building them and uploading them to the app stores. We drastically reduce the time needed to uploading a new version of our apps, enabling us to publish it more frequent with less hassle and less potential for errors.

Pros

Once you have setup your publishing pipeline it is really comfortable to use. You do not have to worry about building your apps, configuring it for productive use, and uploading it to the app stores. While most of our requirements can be fulfilled with the workflow editor, all others could be solved using the scripts before or after each step. The documentation is really helpful and shows solution to many problems we were facing when setting up the delivery pipeline.

Cons

If you do not use the basic workflow it was quite difficult to setup the publishing pipeline. As soon as one script/part failed, you had to debug it and start the whole build from the start which can take quite a long time. It would be really helpful to have the ability to resume the build.

Alternatives considered

[GitLab](https://www.capterra.com/p/159806/GitLab/)[Bitrise](https://www.capterra.com/p/178004/Bitrise/)

Review Source

Response from Nevercode

August 3, 2021

Thank you for your feedback. We cannot do "resume build" due to some reasons. The most basic reason is after they fix the error we cannot guarantee that the fix did not break the previously passed steps. Therefore, it is not feasible to start a build from where they failed. In this case, we would suggest you to download binary and running them in terminals for that. Hope this was useful for you. Happy building!

DC

Diogo C.  
Software Engineer  
Computer Software  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "Easy to set up"

July 1, 2021

4.0

Pros

The easy of us. Editing via UI or the config file

Cons

The time it takes to build, can be quite slow when building

Review Source

SP

Sovit P.  
Full Stack Developer  
Information Technology and Services  
Used the software for: 1-2 years

### "Highly recommend CodeMagic for Flutter apps"

July 8, 2021

5.0

Definitely the best CI/CD platform for Flutter apps.

Pros

\- Intuitive User interface, - Thorough consideration of deployment process for both Google Play and Apple Store, - Excellent documentations and Customer Support, - Pretty good API for automating things

Cons

I honestly couldn't think of anything that I do not like about CodeMagic. It's a great product!

Review Source

Response from Nevercode

August 3, 2021

Thank you for your support!

Similar Products

Featured

## Related categories

[Application Development](https://www.capterra.com/application-development-software/)[Continuous Integration](https://www.capterra.com/continuous-integration-software/)[Automated Testing](https://www.capterra.com/automated-testing-software/)