---
title: "Codemagic Reviews 2026. Verified Reviews, Pros & Cons | Capterra"
description: "Is Codemagic the right Automated Testing solution for you? Explore 125 verified user reviews from people in industries like yours to make a confident choice."
source_url: "https://www.capterra.com/p/152573/Nevercode/reviews/"
page_type: "reviews"
language: "en"
---

Codemagic

4.7 (125)

Provider data verified by our Software Research team, and reviews moderated by our Reviews Verification team. [Learn more](https://www.capterra.com/our-story/)

* * *

Last updated August 26th, 2026

# Reviews of Codemagic

Ease of use

4.6

Customer Service

4.6

## Pros and Cons in Reviews

IS

Ignacio S

Real Estate AgentReal Estate, 2 - 10 employeesUsed the software for: More than 2 years.

“I love Codemagic's simple build and development tools that make it easy to automate tests and provide stable property apps with fast cloud service integration and rapid deployments.“

October 18, 2025

IR

Ivan R

Software EngineerInformation Technology and Services, 2 - 10 employeesUsed the software for: Less than 6 months.

“No support at all.“

August 19, 2024

Maria Cecilia B

Senior Quality Assurance ManagerIndustrial Automation, 501 - 1,000 employeesUsed the software for: Less than 6 months.

“It offered great support to integrate our iOS, Ionic and Flutter app projects in CI/CD pipelines, making it a great tool for mobile app projects.“

February 18, 2023

GP

Greg P

iOS EngineerFinancial Services, 201 - 500 employeesUsed the software for: Less than 6 months.

“Some minor issues, like when I connect new repository into codemagic it was not fetching codemagic.yaml and I needed to refresh and try to add it again.“

July 28, 2022

Joseph M

Senior DeveloperComputer Software, 501 - 1,000 employeesUsed the software for: More than 2 years.

“I also value the degree of customisation that is offered because it enables me to modify the platform to suit my particular requirements.“

May 14, 2023

Maria Cecilia B

Senior Quality Assurance ManagerIndustrial Automation, 501 - 1,000 employeesUsed the software for: Less than 6 months.

“We had some trouble with SSO setup but it might have been our mistake, not sure about the real issue.“

February 18, 2023

NH

Niklas H

Co-FounderCosmetics, 2 - 10 employeesUsed the software for: Less than 6 months.

“You do not have to worry about building your apps, configuring it for productive use, and uploading it to the app stores. While most of our requirements can be fulfilled with the workflow editor, all others could be solved using the scripts before or after each step.“

July 4, 2021

Ivo B

Software EngineerFinancial Services, 11 - 50 employeesUsed the software for: 6-12 months.

“Lately webhook events are sometimes processed out of order when you have multiple coming in (for example you push to a branch with an open PR, which triggers a hook for both the push and the P{R update).“

July 1, 2021

## Showing most helpful reviews

Showing 1-25 of 125 Reviews

Sort by:

Most Helpful

Rating

Company Size

Reviewer's Role

Length of Use

Frequency of Use

Ivo B.  
Software Engineer  
Financial Services  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "Overall Good CI/CD for Flutter"

July 1, 2021

5.0

We needed a CI to build and publish a Flutter app for Android and iOS to both stores as well as Firebase App Distribution. Bitbucket Pipelines doesn't offer Mac machines so we chose something Flutter-specific to not have to worry about Flutter setup in CI. The good pre-configuration of the build machines as well as publishing tools saved us a lot of time in setting up the CI.

Pros

Good integration with Bitbucket, easy to use UI to set up CI jobs. Mac machines with everything preinstalled to do Flutter testing, build and releases. Allows auto-cancelling of previous builds if new commits are pushed. Especially App Store Connect helpers were very welcome since we didn't have much experience with publishing iOS apps. Newer Yaml configuration option also works well and can of course be versioned with the rest of the app.

Cons

Lately webhook events are sometimes processed out of order when you have multiple coming in (for example you push to a branch with an open PR, which triggers a hook for both the push and the P{R update). That can lead to the wrong builds being auto-cancelled and a bit of confusion as to whats happening. Sometime issues with retrieving build logs. Dark mode could use more contrast. Linux machines still lack cache support. All in all only minor issues though.

Alternatives considered

[Bitbucket](https://www.capterra.com/p/233341/Bitbucket/)

Reason for choosing Codemagic

We're using Bitbucket for our repos but it's CI services does not support Mac machines so we needed something that did. Codemagic did also also offered a lot of other convenience features.

Review Source

Enes C.  
DevOps  
Computer Games  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "Unity CI/CD"

June 1, 2022

5.0

We have faster build times. It is more secure than Jenkins. Very easy to setup for developers and other team members.

Pros

We were having a hard time building our games on Jenkins and codemagic came to the rescue. We can take concurrent builds at the same time for iOS, since it's a SaaS we don't have to manage the platform. It's very easy to use and set up. Pretty cheap when you compare it with the other platforms.

Cons

You can store your codemagic.yaml file on the website so you always have to have it on your repository.

Alternatives considered

[CircleCI](https://www.capterra.com/p/150380/CircleCI/)[Bitrise](https://www.capterra.com/p/178004/Bitrise/)

Reason for choosing Codemagic

It's cheaper and Unity is pre-installed on the codemagic.

Switched from

[Jenkins](https://www.capterra.com/p/171026/Jenkins/)

It's 2022

Review Source

KS

Khaled S.  
h  
Health, Wellness and Fitness  
Used the software for: I used a free trial

### "Give your review a title Excellent Flutter CI/CD platform for iOS and Android"

August 23, 2026

5.0

My overall experience has been excellent. I was able to connect my private GitHub repository, configure my Flutter project, set up Android and iOS signing, and start a release build very quickly. The platform saves a huge amount of time compared with managing separate build environments manually. The UI is also very polished and makes the whole process feel professional. Definitely one of the best tools I have used for Flutter CI/CD.

Pros

Codemagic makes building Flutter apps for both iOS and Android incredibly simple. The interface is clean, the workflow editor is easy to understand, and setting up code signing and building IPA and AAB files is much faster than doing everything manually. I especially like being able to build both platforms from one place using a Mac build machine.

Cons

Some of the advanced settings can be a little confusing the first time, especially options such as Shorebird, code signing, and distribution. A few more beginner-friendly explanations directly inside the workflow editor would make the setup even easier.

Review Source

MG

Mahendra G.  
react native intern  
Translation and Localization  
Used the software for: I used a free trial

### "Mobile app hardware limitation"

July 3, 2021

3.0

i Had made atleast 250+ build request and no doubt for time management this is unbeatable you do not need to wait in queue for long even you have free tier . Codemagic gives default installations of jq like tools which help us to save time in installing it every time plus cache service for add more option in default tools.

Pros

The service of auto code signing and build triggers upon the commits with conditional triggers

Cons

IOs code signing and slack support. the codemagic have very poor documentation for code signing they should given more example and help in code signing process . like i use gaming laptop i dont have ios and now i need ios app ipa file not to upload on appstore but for me to check max size before deliver. i should not need developer account for this . i can do it with xcode and so i can do it with mac cli rather then doing changes every time i can automate it but no help for that while there is appcircle ci/cd which provide their code.

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Android Developer  
Computer Software  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "Magic bullet for mobile CI/CD"

July 3, 2021

4.0

Pros

The UI configuration wizard is one of the coolest thing of the whole system. Also, 1st class Flutter projects support is something I was looking for.

Cons

There is no way to easily do a feature request or contact support, since Codemagic pushes users to their Slack community instead of giving a chance to just contact the right person. Also, after using Bitrise for quite some time it feels like Codemagic misses some additional predefined steps for configuration.

Alternatives considered

[CircleCI](https://www.capterra.com/p/150380/CircleCI/)[Bitrise](https://www.capterra.com/p/178004/Bitrise/)

Switched from

[Bitrise](https://www.capterra.com/p/178004/Bitrise/)

Had issues with configuring iOS builds of my Flutter project on Bitrise

Review Source

James D.  
Founder  
Computer Software  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "A truly wonderful, modern CI"

July 9, 2021

5.0

Pros

The first thing that struck me about Codemagic is that it looks and feels like a modern tool. Many of the competing softwares in the space have a terrible user experience, which makes you immediately shiver when you first open them. Codemagic is quite the opposite. The user interface is clean and the platform is very configurable considering. I've found builds to be fairly quick and the platform stable. They do a great job of rolling out updates consistently.

Cons

While the interface is great, I think there could be some improvement in terms of how projects are laid out. Overall, very minor.

Alternatives considered

[CircleCI](https://www.capterra.com/p/150380/CircleCI/)[Codefresh](https://www.capterra.com/p/156336/Codefresh/)[Bitrise](https://www.capterra.com/p/178004/Bitrise/)

Reason for choosing Codemagic

Codemagic had the best blend of modern tooling while still being highly configurable.

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Senior iOS Engineer  
Marketing and Advertising  
Used the software for: 1-2 years

### "Competent platform for iOS"

July 1, 2021

5.0

Pros

We had an ready transition from our last tool. In the past, changing platforms has been an ordeal.

Cons

Many features are Flutter centric. Sometimes the docs aren't clear that something is specifically for flutter builds, and other platforms feel second class.

Alternatives considered

[CircleCI](https://www.capterra.com/p/150380/CircleCI/)

Reason for choosing Codemagic

We had trouble getting successful builds from circle.

Review Source

David G.  
CTO  
Health, Wellness and Fitness  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "Best CI for Flutter"

July 1, 2021

5.0

Excellent. Not only from a tech, value proposition point of view, but only from a customer service. The slack channel the use for that is an excellent idea.

Pros

It's a CI specific for flutter ecosystem, so you have every option you need for that platform and stack, and no option you don't need.

Cons

The (extremely rare) ocasional instability of a company starting up. Nothing to worry about.

Alternatives considered

[CircleCI](https://www.capterra.com/p/150380/CircleCI/)

Reason for choosing Codemagic

It's specific for flutter, unlike the other options we checked in the market.

Switched from

[Semaphore](https://www.capterra.com/p/171934/Semaphore/)

Not mobile / flutter specific

Review Source

Ryan E.  
Sr. Software Engineer  
Computer Software  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "A great CI/CD tool"

July 30, 2021

4.0

Overall, there is no better combination of price and developer experience. Tools like GitHub Actions are powerful but require more configuration and are probably better suited for larger teams.

Pros

Ease of use - essentially low maintenance once it is set up. Developer experience Great customer support Competitive pricing

Cons

Currently no static analysis or support for code coverage. Reporting on failed tests could also be better. In the past I have had issues with Apple Dev Console authentication. Mac Mini instances can also be slow at times.

Alternatives considered

[GitHub](https://www.capterra.com/p/129067/GitHub/)[CircleCI](https://www.capterra.com/p/150380/CircleCI/)[Travis CI](https://www.capterra.com/p/179183/Travis-CI/)[GitLab](https://www.capterra.com/p/159806/GitLab/)[Bitrise](https://www.capterra.com/p/178004/Bitrise/)

Reason for choosing Codemagic

Ease of use and developer experience. Other solutions may be more performant and cheaper, but they severely lack in terms of developer experience.

Review Source

IS

Ignacio S.  
Real Estate Agent  
Real Estate  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "Fast app development and cloud testing for real estate."

October 18, 2025

4.0

Codemagic assisted me in rapidly developing and testing applications for client access and listing control, streamlining coding so my agency could speed up the release of new services.

Pros

I love Codemagic's simple build and development tools that make it easy to automate tests and provide stable property apps with fast cloud service integration and rapid deployments.

Cons

It took additional effort to understand some complex test management tasks, and intermittent bugs or service downtime interrupted our development during property database updates.

Review Source

DA

Daniel A.  
Application Developer - Senior II  
Veterinary  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "Codemagic is truly Magic"

June 30, 2021

5.0

We had a CI/CD solution setup for a new Flutter app in less than a week which has enabled us to build an entire app within 5 months from start to finish and achieve a tight feedback loop with testers and stakeholders. The customer support quality and responsiveness is unparalleled.

Pros

The ability to get a Flutter app built and deployed is so simple and streamlined that even non-developers can define their own workflows to suit their needs.

Cons

The UI can be a little difficult to navigate at times and find certain features.

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Mobile Software Engineer  
Real Estate  
Used the software for: 1-2 years

### "I don't understand the seat charge"

June 29, 2021

4.0

I have a good experience with Codemagic, it was easy to put my app on production with it.

Pros

The ease of building and sending my app to the official and test stores.

Cons

I can't understand why are you charging for seats. Is it not only the build minutes that matter? What's the point of charge for another seat? For me it's only an inconvenience.

Reason for choosing Codemagic

The flutter-first support.

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Team Leader  
Financial Services  
Used the software for: 1-2 years

### "Codemagic is great for Flutter"

June 29, 2021

5.0

Pros

\- easy setup and use - regular new features (webhooks monitor, .yaml editor, Linux machines, etc.) - support

Cons

\- missing the possibility to post release\_notes with iOS builds - missing the possibility to add additional info to the release\_notes message (e.g. integration testing results to the Slack message) - ugly build logs are on a black background (by design)

Review Source

BL

Bohdan L.  
Flutter developer  
Banking  
Used the software for: 1-2 years

### "Almost perfect"

June 29, 2021

4.0

Codemagic works as part of development pipeline, works almost on all steps of development.

Pros

\* Easy to set up \* Almost full documentation \* Static analyzer works is great \* Deployment feature is great

Cons

\* Setup of environment some time crash wich broken pipeline \* Runned test not always match with local machine \* Some issue with IOS distributions

Reason for choosing Codemagic

Mostly because its support flutter instead of other products

Review Source

IL

Ivan L.  
CEO  
Entertainment  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "Powerful CI/CD tool, beats the competition - but customer service is amazing"

July 1, 2021

5.0

Once we started to get set up, Codemagic offered us a free 45 minute online 1-on-1 with a tech expert to review and advise on our configuration, and offered to come back for more if we needed it. This is customer service excellence - love the product, love the support - TY

Pros

It was a lot easier to set up our flows using codemagic compared to the jenkins options we had been considering

Cons

More targets please - and better integration with both sides of the android / google publications environments, firebase and the google store

Review Source

Response from Nevercode

August 3, 2021

Kuddos on your kind words! This means a lot to our team. We just made it even much cooler by adding Firebase app distribution which should make the publishing quite easy. Please find the docs here: https://docs.codemagic.io/publishing-yaml/distribution/#publishing-an-app-to-firebase-app-distribution Happy building with Codemagic!

DG

Douglas G.  
Developer  
Financial Services  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "Codemagic - it's really magic"

July 6, 2021

5.0

Really very good, magic way to publish apps in stores.

Pros

it's very easy to publish apps in an automated way, both for new apps and for updating apps that already exist.

Cons

the system sometimes charges per user and not just minutes.

Alternatives considered

[CircleCI](https://www.capterra.com/p/150380/CircleCI/)[AWS CloudFormation](https://www.capterra.com/p/205397/CloudFormation/)

Reason for choosing Codemagic

Is the best.

Review Source

Response from Nevercode

August 3, 2021

Thank you! Codemagic does not charge for a seat in the team but for every user that triggers builds. The number of active users is reset at the beginning of every month. Happy building!

DG

Dmitry G.  
  
  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Great tool for ionic builds"

July 8, 2016

5.0

I tried to setup CI for ionic builds on Jenkins and it was a disaster. Android builds are possible but iOS builds is a complete magic, there are only few providers of Macs on cloud, the process is very unclear. Apple is notoriously known for making devs lives over complicated even with Apple tools, not to mention Jenkins and other third-party products. NeverCode was just what I was looking for, a CI cloud based platform to build ionic apps on android and ios. And they keep their promise: you need only few clicks for a simple app. In my case I had to put much more into it, mostly due to the mess in packages.json and other config files. That was the tech debt you should pay before good CI automation anyway. Comparing to Travis Nevercode pricing is very reasonable (not to mention that you barely can build ionic on Travis).

Pros

\* Cloud based -- no need to maintain servers \* Specific, knows about ionic / cordova -- only few settings to get things up and running \* Great customer support -- fast and professional, it feels they are on early stage when devs handle support requests and closely watch for issues \* Easy to learn and use \* Good documentation -- easy to read and understand

Cons

It feels that product is pretty new and many things are missing. Obviously they will be added \* The documentation is too brief sometimes. Apple certs are crazy so Nevercode could elaborate more on how to use them \* No direct support for Google Play publishing, though you can plug a hook and do it easily \* No automation to increase build numbers though it is pretty trivial to do on your own, just be aware you need to write some scripts here \* Lack of security consideration. You shall give permissions to all your repos on github, not to a particular one. No 2FA if register with login/password. No protection for signing certs. (On Travis you cannot really access encrypted keys directly) \* No way to cache node\_modules and folders alike between the builds

Review Source

MR

Mitch R.  
CTO  
Health, Wellness and Fitness  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "Would recommend and actually have multiple times"

July 6, 2021

5.0

Automation, automation, automation.

Pros

As a developer, I'm very lazy and had build pipelines for web and API configured and happily working but building and releasing the Flutter app was always a pain, thanks to the joys of XCode. Codemagic allowed me to avoid opening XCode at least 90% of the time... There are loads of clever features but the main thing is having a triggerable and consistent build pipeline for Flutter.

Cons

Really didn't have any issues with Codemagic. Would love it if it could check if the build number clashes with the latest deployed build number to the App Stores to avoid wasting time building, just to have Apple decline the upload, but that's more of a feature request than a con.

Reason for choosing Codemagic

Not capable of building Flutter (or too complicated to be worth while)

Review Source

Response from Nevercode

August 3, 2021

We have calculated that automating your CI/CD pipeline will save you around 20% of dev time!

MV

Mario V.  
IT Developer  
Information Technology and Services  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "I love codemagic"

June 29, 2021

5.0

This help is to make fast deploys and allow us to develop without care of compilation time

Pros

Is very simple to implement and have a amazing api to make the deploys

Cons

I want to share when a build failed with another non registered users

Review Source

SK

Steven K.  
Owner  
Hospitality  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "Good bang-for-the-buck for Ionic Capacitor Apps"

August 17, 2021

5.0

End of the day, very pleased with Codemagic. While the setup effort is non-trivial for Capacitor, it is worth the effort and a far more cost-effective option vs. alternatives.

Pros

Codemagic was one of the few cloud-based CI/CD solutions that supported the Ionic Capacitor build flow for iOS & Android apps. Once setup & validated, it is extremely easy to use for day-to-day builds. It is also quite cost-effective for small-time developers - amazing amount of functionality at the free tier.

Cons

Setup for Capacitor is not easy. There are some helpful blogs, but it was still a significant challenge to get things up & running the first time. It would be very helpful to have a 'canned' Capacitor flow that worked out of the box to hit the ground running.

Reason for choosing Codemagic

Appflow is very easy to use (setup much easier than Codemagic) but is too expensive for small-time developers.

Review Source

GP

Greg P.  
iOS Engineer  
Financial Services  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Codemagic as any other CI alternative"

July 28, 2022

5.0

9/10

Pros

Codemagic is easy to use. Documentation is well written and easy to understand. Integration with our existing infrastructure was smooth and quick.

Cons

Some minor issues, like when I connect new repository into codemagic it was not fetching codemagic.yaml and I needed to refresh and try to add it again.

Reason for choosing Codemagic

Good price for very well performance. Nice and friendly communication. Easy to integrate

Review Source

ML

Michela L.  
System Engineer  
Information Technology and Services  
Used the software for: I used a free trial

### "Codemagic review"

June 30, 2021

5.0

for me who use the free version even with the session time limit I can still classify as one of the best production environment tools

Pros

it is absolutely essential for the cross-platform developer. With.o codemagic it is possible to validate and test the system without the need to create multiple virtual machines and spend time configuring environments.

Cons

I still find it a bit expensive, especially considering that many developers are "one-man companies", there should be a fixed weekly price for example. That it would be possible to hire the service for a week without deducting minutes.

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Flutter developer  
Food & Beverages  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "This platform saves me hours"

July 1, 2021

5.0

Great!

Pros

Now I can git push and forget about manually doing lots of steps each time I want to deploy an update.

Cons

Automatic creation of a new version draft on iTunes Connect

Review Source

IB

Inshan B.  
Software Engineer  
Information Technology and Services  
Used the software for: 1-2 years

### "Build iOS Apps without a Mac"

August 9, 2021

5.0

Pros

I love codemagic because I can deploy iOS applications without an apple device. I can also remote into the virtual mac machine and make changes within xcode. I can leave the app to build and go about my business and be notified via email if it succeeds or fails.

Cons

I love that I dont need a macbook to create iOS applications on

Review Source

DS

Debkanchan S.  
Founder  
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad  
Used the software for: 1-2 years

### "As simple as CI/CD could get"

July 26, 2021

5.0

Pros

We started with no idea about CI/CD at all. In 2 days we managed to set up a holistic CI/CD pipeline without writings a single line of yaml. Codemagic docs is all I needed to get started.

Cons

Currently we do not have any complaints with codemagic

Reason for choosing Codemagic

Simplicity

Review Source

Response from Nevercode

August 2, 2021

Thank you for your support! That's amazing you were able to set up the whole pipeline that fast. The seamless setup is one of our top priorities. Happy building!