Insights For Performance

IFP

5 / 5 1 review

Who Uses This Software?

Organizations wanting to eliminate paper from their hiring and onboarding processes and having the need to attract more candidates, make faster and better hiring decisions.


Average Ratings

1 Review
  • 5 / 5
    Overall
  • 5 / 5
    Ease of Use
  • 5 / 5
    Customer Service

Product Details

  • Starting Price
    $795.00/year
  • Pricing Details
    up to 25 employees
  • Free Trial
    Yes
  • Deployment
    Cloud, SaaS, Web
  • Training
    Documentation
    Webinars
  • Support
    Online
    Business Hours

Vendor Details

  • Insights For Performance
  • www.insightsforperformance.com/
  • Founded 2003
  • United States

About IFP

Applicant Pool is easy to use, and affordable! Pricing based on number of employees, with unlimited restricted manager logins at no additional cost! Custom careers website & job posting management with ability to push to paid, free, workforce job boards and social media with a single click. Instantly and automatically screen applicants based on job screening questions. Powerful reporting and career site analytics including OFCCP/Affirmative Action tracking from job postings to log reports!


Spotlight_media_placeholder

IFP Features

  • Assessments
  • Background Screening
  • Candidate Management
  • Collaboration Tools
  • Internal HR
  • Interview Management
  • Job Requisition
  • Onboarding
  • Recruiting Firms
  • Reference Checking
  • Resume Parsing
  • Resume Search
  • Self Service Portal

IFP Reviews

iApplicants is a great system

Jan 31, 2014
5/5
Overall
5 / 5
Ease of Use
5 / 5
Customer Support

Comments: I have used this system for a few years (about six). It is very user friendly and I've always received prompt, courteous service. The staff is very friendly, helpful and knowledgeable.

Pros
-Affordable
-User Friendly
-Great Customer Service

Cons
The only thing I can think of that would make life a bit easier is that I would like it if once I archived a job that there would be a way to "hide" it in the modified jobs listing of archived positions. Honestly though, I think this is user error from all of us in my dept because I don't think the application was used correctly in the beginning; therefore we have lots of multiples of the same job, same location, etc.