---
title: "BlazeMeter Reviews 2026. Verified Reviews, Pros & Cons | Capterra"
description: "Is BlazeMeter the right Performance Testing solution for you? Explore 29 verified user reviews from people in industries like yours to make a confident choice."
source_url: "https://www.capterra.com/p/157045/BlazeMeter/reviews/"
page_type: "reviews"
language: "en"
publication_date: "2026-10-19"
---

BlazeMeter

4.4 (29)

[View alternatives](https://www.capterra.com/p/157045/BlazeMeter/alternatives/)

Provider data verified by our Software Research team, and reviews moderated by our Reviews Verification team. [Learn more](https://www.capterra.com/our-story/)

* * *

Last updated October 19th, 2026

# Reviews of BlazeMeter

Ease of use

4.3

Customer Service

3.9

## Showing most helpful reviews

Showing 1-25 of 29 available reviews

Sort by:

Most Helpful

Rating

Company Size

Reviewer's Role

Length of Use

Frequency of Use

R

Reviewer  
Performance Test Engineer  
Used the software for: 1-3 years

### "'Spread your executions without boundaries'"

September 17, 2018

5.0

Easy to work with it and highly recommended for any performance tester.

Pros

User interface is not complex. Easy to understand and work flow is very simple. Comes with many useful testing features. Using jmeter we can record and run test scripts with simple steps. And it comes with various listeners types, status report types and assertion types which are very useful when creating test scripts (Jmeter). I can simply import existing projects (Jmeter project files) into ‘blazemeter’. Also reporing and graph features are very accurate. By using cloud services, it gives more weight to my executions. Because of that i can reduce unnecessary cost and time. Thread counts and user counts are highly customizable.

Cons

No cons to say. Perfect application for my performance testings.

Review Source

Verified Reviewer  
Senior QA Engineer  
Used the software for: 1-3 years

### "API Monitoring with Runscope - a fantastic and fully functional app at a reasonable price point."

February 14, 2018

4.0

Simplified API testing tool. Easy for non-programmers to create tests (with minimal guidance). Great integration capability with Jira/Slack so that things can be easily driven with Jenkins as far as test execution kick-off/reporting/etc.

Pros

Simple API endpoint verification (200 OK, text has body, etc.) to more complex chained API endpoint verifications via GET/PUT/PATCH/DELETE requests that combine 200 OK, JSON body IDs/values as well as a host of other verification areas.

Cons

Initially, the basics of setting up tests are pretty straight forward, but learning the little nuances of making effective tests using shared environment variables and params is where some of the real power exists. The more parameterized your tests are, the less tests you'll have to maintain; which also allows for easier maintenance/modification when necessary.

Review Source

R

Reviewer  
Software Development  
Used the software for: Less than 1 year

### "Nice to use."

February 4, 2025

4.0

Pros

A very nice UI that is pleasant to look at.

Cons

A little bit complex to navigate, and hard to remember all the steps for running everything properly

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Senior Consultant  
Used the software for: 3-5 years

### "Great way to manage APIs without Selenium"

January 8, 2019

5.0

It has helped us identify when a deploy has broken something.

Pros

If you're not a developer and can't write test automation, this should be your go-to tool to manage APIs. It helps you test any endpoint you want on almost any schedule you want to the very minute. You can hit an endpoint daily, hourly, every 15 min, etc. You can customize headers, request bodys, etc. There are also lots of assertions that can be used to verify if an endpoint is functioning as intended. You can even set variables from one API call to another.

Cons

More flexibility with intricate use cases regarding an API would be great.

Review Source

R

Reviewer  
Business Analyst and Functional Tester  
Used the software for: Less than 1 year

### "Blazemeter was a failed attempt in load testing"

February 5, 2025

2.0

Blazemeter was purchased to fufill our load testing requirement. But however, due to lack of documentation, troubleshooting and bad reports, Blazemeter was not successful in fulfilling our load testing needs. When we contacted support, the cost of helping to set up test on our platform was way too high. Blazemeter was a failed experience overall.

Pros

The extension to record Jmeter was easy to use.

Cons

The reports were not detailed enough to provide an insight for my performance testing needs.

Review Source

Verified Reviewer  
Founder  
Used the software for: 3-5 years

### "Runscope provides powerful tools for monitoring APIs"

April 27, 2018

4.0

Pros

Runscope is powerful and provides a bunch of great tools for monitoring APIs whether your own (which is the stated product goal), or other APIs that you may consume, which we do to great effect. We're able to keep an eye on a bunch of APIs at all times and be quickly notified when something isn't working as expected. Their reliability and customer support has also been superb.

Cons

Runscope's pricing is pretty steep, however they provide a pretty solid product in exchange for what they charge. It's also a complex product, and this complexity sometimes means that trying to quickly put together a test ends up with a confusing array of options and pages to configure. Runscope is an expert tool, and as a result the learning curve is a bit steep.

Review Source

Muhammad Uzair L.  
Senior Performance Tester  
Used the software for: 3-5 years

### "Review regarding Load testing and Script Recording"

March 1, 2021

5.0

Overall Blazemeter is recommended for everyone!it is best tool regarding load and performance testing and also good not excellent for script recording as well as it is best to present stats from Blazemeter.

Pros

As it is best tool for script recording! i always use this extension in my browser for script recording which gives me best opportunity of recording. When i convert it to jmx and import in JMeter it is very ease to use those all calls. As i also use for performance stats in graphical form it is best to show stats in graphical form.

Cons

As sometimes it becomes complex during recording in my extension! It is difficult to use steps at the time of recording.there should be some more easy feature for recording and tell about steps name like when i performed recording in JMeter like any boxes you can say for recording and each box has its name. it becomes complex when calls of two modules record in same step.

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Software Manager  
Used the software for: 1-3 years

### "Makes API test automation easy and accessible to the smallest of teams"

March 29, 2018

4.0

Pros

The learning curve is quick and even a single QA can quickly create a whole wealth of tests. Using environments allows the reuse of tests and see how features progress through the SDLC. Integration with alerting and monitoring tools allows for quick identification of test failures.

Cons

Difficult to version the test themselves. Finding a way to put the tests themselves into Git would be a great addition.

Review Source

Verified Reviewer  
Senior Quality Software Engineer  
Used the software for: 1-3 years

### "API Testing "

February 13, 2023

5.0

Pros

We were looking for tools in api testing and after finding Runscope we were happy. We have automated many api calls and the reporting is simple and effective.

Cons

It is paid. You must have previous knowledge of what you want to achieve and in general how to do Api testing right.

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Software Quality Assurance Engineer  
Used the software for: Less than 1 year

### "Blazemeter Chrome extenstion"

July 18, 2019

5.0

As a Software Quality Assurance Professional I would like to highly recommend this for recordings during performance testing.

Pros

This tool helped me a lot in performing performance tests during my projects. I was able to do my recordings in a way which is really easy & tidy. Also it is supportable for both YAML & JMX file formats. I was able to use the jmx script easily in JMeter to do the performance testing. We also could edit the script using editor itself which is another advantage

Cons

It still saves all the requests including some unnecessary requests. It 'll be better if we could limit it to certain extent

Review Source

Lougene M.  
Software Quality Assurance Engineer  
Used the software for: Less than 1 year

### "Leading integrated tool for JMeter in the market -- for FREE!"

January 9, 2023

4.0

Overall, I definitely recommend BlazeMeter if you were to use it together with Chrome browser as it already comes with it exclusive extension, BlazeMeter. Through BlazeMeter, I was able to do record-and-play functionality for the performance testing scripts and then export a jmx file which can be imported in JMeter tool.

Pros

I've used BlazeMeter as a complementary tool for Apache Meter. I love the fact that it can be downloaded as a Chrome extension so you can utilize it seamlessly without having to experience a long and tedious setup and installation. There are also a lot of tutorials out there where BlazeMeter-JMeter integration can be learned. BlazeMeter is absolutely free, in my experience so there is no worry to break a bank for you to use the core functionalities. If you are looking a way to generate a jmx file for JMeter and do a recording for performance testing, use BlazeMeter.

Cons

Nothing much. While it is not really required for you to fully use JMeter, using BlazeMeter will be absolutely helpful if you want to be faster in your load/performance testing.

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
QA Manager  
Used the software for: Less than 1 year

### "Better UI and light weight API monitoring platform"

December 12, 2022

5.0

Pros

has better report mechanism than other API monitoring system also can be easily integrated with other apps for reporting downtime

Cons

Import feature can be tweaked a little bit to easily import API data from other sources

Review Source

R

Reviewer  
CTO  
Used the software for: 1-3 years

### "The only way we test our APIs and use them ourselves"

November 23, 2019

5.0

We are able to make system changes quicker while using the UI and Runscope to interact with our own admin API and test customer facing APIs for functionality. Great tool overall!

Pros

We are able to not only test our APIs, new and existing, but we can actually use it to run our own queries and system updates with a pretty UI instead of a linux console.

Cons

It would be nice to have a feature that is geared more towards running queries rather then just testing, something like just a json query box that sends a payload.

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Software Quality Assurance Analyst  
Used the software for: Less than 1 year

### "Blazing the trail in Performance and Load Testing"

February 12, 2018

4.0

Perfomance Testing of Software

Pros

BlazeMeter is a great performance testing tool that even a beginner tester can take up and start using at least the basic features. BlazeMeter can execute JMeter tests which is a major plus for testing and development teams. Its Real Time reporting features are great in supporting the test management effort.

Cons

Great tool for software testers. May require a bit of research and tutorials to get started, but once that is done, its smooth sailing.

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Associate SQA Engineer  
Used the software for: Less than 1 year

### "A great continuous testing platform."

January 2, 2020

4.0

I love that tool very much, BlazeMeter is a complete continuous testing platform. A complete tool that test multiple type of testing. I have used this tool as a plugin of JMeter for performance testing and later on used it for functionality testing and API monitoring. Very much satisfied with this tool.

Pros

One platform that has performance, functional, mock services and API testing facility that is incredible. Very easy user interface and simple plugin process into Jmeter, Jenkins, etc. Easy to record and import the scripts and the report is very simple and easy to understand. I liked their newly added 360 API testing and monitoring system and mock services.

Cons

Very difficult to find their negative side, but they should provide more functionality inside their free version and their pricing quite expensive.

Review Source

R

Reviewer  
Linux Administrator  
Used the software for: Less than 1 year

### "Great for teams of all sizes"

December 18, 2019

5.0

Our problem was notification, we didn't have a mechanism to notify the people who needed to know when it came to our API. In the past we had a status page that showed UP/DOWN/Response but we had to actively view it. Now we can only direct our attention to whats needed based on notifications.

Pros

We can view at a glance the health of our API and notify our team when issues arise as soon as they do. No more having to view bland status pages, now our whole team gets notified and can proactively resolve any issue.

Cons

Pricing is a little steep when moving from 5 to 40 members. I'd like to see another option, or make it flexible in a way that allows per seat purchase.

Review Source

Bharat S.  
Software Engineer  
Used the software for: Less than 1 year

### "Amazing testing tool "

February 24, 2020

4.0

I am happy with their services they provide. Performed number of task with it.

Pros

Blaze master is open source testing tool for automation and performance. It easy to use and reporting system is awesome. It works for all type of applications.

Cons

I don’t find much cons in this software. It helps me a lot in performance testing many times. trail version should provide more functionality.

Review Source

R

Reviewer

### "Made my Life a lot easier"

May 17, 2017

5.0

Runscope is the single online service that made my life as programmer a lot easier. We use it for both, debugging APIs, especially during the collaboration of Frontend/Backend teams and for automated testing. The "Traffic" Module is the one we get the most value from. We use the "Test" feature mainly for functional tests of our API, less for constant monitoring, but it provides us with good data. It takes a little to understand the overall navigation of Runscope. Single pages, especially the request and test editor are structured very logically and easy to use.

Review Source

R

Reviewer  
Testing Team Lead  
Used the software for: Less than 1 year

### "It was very easy for a beginner like me to figure out and get started as its UI is very intuitive"

August 10, 2017

4.0

Pros

Its is great cause I create and debug my scripts locally (using jmeter) and then upload and use BlazeMeter when I need serious power (or to look share nice looking graphs with clients). As an added bonus, I can even run tests locally on my own JMeter instance and have BlazeMeter show me the nice graphs! (I'm not sure why more jmeter users aren't taking advantage of this).

Cons

I was originally using JMeter on my local machine which was fine for very small loads, but I once I needed to test a few thousand virtual users I wasn't able to scale.

Review Source

R

Reviewer  
Founder

### "The best platform for automating API tests"

May 17, 2017

5.0

At Wedgies.com, we use Runscope's products to test our integrations with 3rd party APIs as well as to monitor our own endpoints during the development process and in production. Runscope's engineers are always quick to hop on any issue that comes up or assistance that we need.

Review Source

Yegor L.  
QA Consultant  
Used the software for: 1-3 years

### "BlazeMeter for load testing"

September 15, 2022

5.0

Overall I'm very happy with the functionalities of BlazeMeter.

Pros

The tool is excellent and I have used it for a long time. It gives a nice visual presentation of the performance, infographics, and most of all detailed reporting.

Cons

I'm happy with the functionalities that I'm using.

Review Source

R

Reviewer  
Associate Quality Analyst  
Used the software for: Less than 1 year

### "Powerful tool for a tester"

September 9, 2019

4.0

I love the tool as it helps me in testing way too much.

Pros

Its user interface is great as iys easy to use and very helpful in performance testing. I use blaze meter along with jmeter and it provides great graphical representation

Cons

Its free version has less functionality than its paid version but its expensive

Review Source

R

Reviewer  
Team Lead  
Used the software for: Less than 1 year

### "It is amazing the best lies with the ease of usability"

September 7, 2017

3.0

Better performance test and their statistics. They have amazing reporting feature.

Pros

The reporting is the best element in it. For performance tests reporting is most difficult. Blazemeter provides variety of reports with all useful elements

Cons

The least liked element is customer support. We sometimes have to wait for days to get the resolution or help

Review Source

R

Reviewer

### "Good service, tested 4k users, went smoothly"

July 30, 2013

5.0

Overall I've been quite satisfied with BlazeMeter. I signed up for the Pro plan earlier this month as I wanted to test with 4k users on our deal of the day site which was crashing at bad times i.e. whenever we would put up a deal :( I shopped around quite a bit and settled on Blazemeter as it was the only tool that I got to work correctly for my site login process (I'm creating a few hundred random new logins on my dev server per test). I really like that I can develop my scripts locally and then upload them to BlazeMeter when I need to test with 4k users. Blazemeter provided a good visualization of all the data I normally get from JMeter, I also got some graphs which show me exactly where the site's breaking point is - pretty helpful. It was a simple process, and very worth the $500 (I ran over 15 load tests).

Pros

\--JMeter is the best, most popular testing tool on the planet. No proprietary BS or hardware. -- Absurdly attentive customer support when I was having JMeter issues. -- Fairly priced at $500/month. Other options would have cost 4 times more.

Cons

\-- You are billed per test, not per minute, i.e. a 10 minute test costs as much as 1 hour one. -- Not the best price if you are only going to run one test a year.

Review Source

R

Reviewer  
QA engineer  
Used the software for: 1-3 years

### "Excelent tool for performance"

August 2, 2019

5.0

Pros

This is a great tool with a great UI to create scripts for performance testing

Cons

I would like to have an easiest way to integrate blazemeter into jmeter

Review Source

Similar Products

Featured