Free
- 1 seat
- 1 runner
- 300 pipeline GB-minutes
- 1 GB of pipeline cache
- 1 GB of sandbox storage
Capterra’s researchers use a mix of verified reviews, independent research and objective methodologies to bring you selection and ranking information you can trust. While we may earn a referral fee when you visit a provider through our links or speak to an advisor, this has no influence on our research or methodology.
Capterra carefully verified over 2 million reviews to bring you authentic software and services experiences from real users. Our human moderators verify that reviewers are real people and that reviews are authentic. They use leading tech to analyze text quality and to detect plagiarism and generative AI. Learn more.
Capterra lists all providers across its website—not just those that pay us—so that users can make informed purchase decisions. Capterra is free for users. Software and service providers pay us for sponsored profiles to receive web traffic and sales opportunities. Sponsored profiles include a link-out icon that takes users to the provider’s website. Learn more.
Looking to learn more about Continuous Integration software similar to Buddy? Check out these popular alternatives that are closest in terms of key features, functionality, and benefits.
Pros
As the account owner, with no direct hands on development, I appreciated the costs were well within reason.
With Buddy I was able to consolidate my deployment tools, and save money. The platform is super intuitive and more powerful than what we were using previously.
Cons
Lack of documentation to set up automated tests.
No integrations for output parsing (ex. junit is not parsed) only raw output.
"Software that does what you expect it to"
Pros: As the account owner, with no direct hands on development, I appreciated the costs were well within reason.
Cons: There are no features missing that I can see but I'm not the developer.
"Buddy review"
Pros: Flexibility. We use it to deploy anything from web apps with Vue.js, server-side applications with Laravel, WordPress and Node without any issues.
Cons: Lack of documentation to set up automated tests. I'd like to run unit tests with Jest, so it would be great if there was clear examples on how to do so and fail a deploy on failed tests.