---
title: "Submittable Reviews 2026. Verified Reviews, Pros & Cons | Capterra"
description: "Is Submittable the right Scholarship Management solution for you? Explore 398 verified user reviews from people in industries like yours to make a confident choice."
source_url: "https://www.capterra.com/p/158382/Submittable/reviews/"
page_type: "reviews"
language: "en"
---

Submittable

4.8 (398)

Provider data verified by our Software Research team, and reviews moderated by our Reviews Verification team. [Learn more](https://www.capterra.com/our-story/)

* * *

Last updated July 23rd, 2026

# Reviews of Submittable

Ease of use

4.6

Customer Service

4.8

## Pros and Cons in Reviews

Margo S

Director of Creative Strategies and Arts-Based InitiativesNon-Profit Organization Management, 2 - 10 employeesUsed the software for: More than 2 years.

“Our independent review committees appreciate having streamlined access to their assigned applications and find the scoring interface especially helpful, since they can view the full application and rubric side-by-side.“

December 3, 2025

EH

Emily H

Program ManagerEducation Management, 11 - 50 employeesUsed the software for: 6-12 months.

“It makes it hard to train other teams when their views look different than an admin view and I can't toggle back and forth but instead have to start playing with incognito windows, permissions, fake email addresses etc“

February 23, 2024

KS

Karey S

Associate Director of Experiential LearningHigher Education, 11 - 50 employeesUsed the software for: More than 2 years.

“Compared to other tools I've used, Submittable makes it easier and faster to create projects, improves our administrative workflow, and creates a better experience for applicants.“

December 10, 2025

KW

Kristen W

Director of GrantmakingNon-Profit Organization Management, 2 - 10 employeesUsed the software for: Less than 6 months.

“Specifically, I discovered a few features mentioned in our initial sales call were not part of our subscription package and would require an additional fee, which was prohibitively expensive for our small organization.“

June 5, 2024

Margo S

Director of Creative Strategies and Arts-Based InitiativesNon-Profit Organization Management, 2 - 10 employeesUsed the software for: More than 2 years.

“The platform has strengthened every stage of our grantmaking process, from launching opportunities to reviewing, scoring, and reporting.“

December 3, 2025

JB

Jennifer B

SR. BUSINESS MANAGER Computer & Network Security, 5,001 - 10,000 employeesUsed the software for: 1-2 years.

“the search function for the charitable org. Seems the information is outdated and although you are clear to say no longer excepting donation for some rogs why would they even populate?“

September 25, 2023

Leila M. S

Senior Program ManagerNon-Profit Organization Management, 11 - 50 employeesUsed the software for: More than 2 years.

“This allowed me (one of the main users) to be confident in adding to the application or modifying it (e.g., after the deadline passed, reopening it or create a new form to send applicants in the Submitable system to collect additional information from them).“

July 1, 2025

LC

Laura C

Program ManagerPhilanthropy, 11 - 50 employeesUsed the software for: 1-2 years.

“Lack of automation, limited placeholder tags to be able to integrate DocuSign or other 3rd party integrations that would help with automation, delayed reporting, kind of messy once you get a lot of applications/projects set up, no intentional nonprofit relationship management capabilities, limited project/award management features.“

September 14, 2022

## Showing most helpful reviews

Showing 1-25 of 398 Reviews

Sort by:

Most Helpful

Rating

Company Size

Reviewer's Role

Length of Use

Frequency of Use

Orsella H.  
Executive Director  
Non-Profit Organization Management  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "The Best Decision for our Grant Management"

August 28, 2023

5.0

With Wizehive, the grant management process at our foundation has changed for the better drastically. To have 100's of grant applications in one place and be able to manage archived and current applications with ease has cut my work by more than half.

Pros

The customer service is unmatched. From billing to IT, messages are returned on the same day. For me, that is better than the program itself. I never speak to a BOT or an AI rep. I can actually still speak/email with a human and that makes me stay with Wizehive.

Cons

I haven't run into any issues using Wizehive.

Review Source

AR

Adam R.  
Executive Director  
Philanthropy  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "WizeHive is the right size solution"

October 1, 2024

5.0

From sales to support staff, it has been a pleasure to work with the WizeHive team to this point. Setup, while intensive, has been pretty painless. We have strong expectations for usage.

Pros

We're just on the finishing end of launching our database, transitioning out from another database provider we've used for the past 7 years. While that provider required learning the liquid coding language or contracting with their team to make any changes, WizeHive offers incredible flexibility and ease of use. As the sole staffer of a foundation, I need the database to run smoothly and for changes to be made easily, so that management does not take up too much time. WizeHive's team has been excellent in helping us get off the ground and prepare the system for launch. Work with our previous provider was kind of a nightmare in comparison. Using the system seems like it will be pretty seamless from both an administrator and grantee perspective, but we will find out once it is put into use in a few weeks. We considered WizeHive when we made our previous selection 7 years ago, and the company has grown in a way that we believe will address all our needs in an elegant way. This seems like a solution that was able to be right-sized for our needs, without additional feature bloating that complicates some of the other options on the market.

Cons

There are a few features that are still coming online that will be essential for us, including document and email merge field capability within the system. Our previous system was strong on graphic capability, we will see how Wizehive is in use in terms of being able to quickly view and access data in a clean way.

Alternatives considered

[Blackbaud Grantmaking](https://www.capterra.com/p/242266/Blackbaud-Grantmaking/)[Good Grants](https://www.capterra.com/p/206672/Good-Grants/)[Submittable](https://www.capterra.com/p/158382/Submittable/)[Grant Lifecycle Manager](https://www.capterra.com/p/122147/Grant-Lifecycle-Manager/)

Reason for choosing Submittable

Ease of Use, Feature Selection, Price, Available Support, Customizability, Development Roadmap

Switched from

[Fluxx Grantmaker](https://www.capterra.com/p/146625/Fluxx-Software-for-Grantmakers/)

Complexity inherent in program in being able to make changes to the system. The system was also overbuilt for our needs. The roadmap of future development and incremental updates did not warrant the annual price increases which led us to explore other options in the marketplace.

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Project Coordinator  
Education Management  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "Not worth the money"

July 30, 2019

3.0

Overall, this system is not user friendly. I find myself spending so much time going through their help center documents. When I don't find a solution to my problem, I have no choice but to contact customer service which is a headache. It takes them about 24 hours to reply to urgent matters and most of the time they provide a complicated solution which they assume we would know how to do. We pay thousands of dollars every year not to have 24/7 customer service or for WizeHive not to make better improvements to the system. The only major change that they have done this year was redesigning the login page.

Pros

It does the basics that every other platform does. The application from the applicant side and review portals are easy to use.

Cons

\-There's no support provided via phone unless you email them first and schedule a meeting (which takes a few days for urgent matters). -Emails usually end up in spam folders. -You can't duplicate applications or move them to the next year's cycle which is frustrating if you've deferred an applicant. -The letter generator plugin is not the greatest. You can't insert certain information which means you will probably have to do write the letters manually. -Recreating all the forms for each year -Submitted and incomplete (unsubmitted) applications are all saved in one place. -The system does not automatically email applicants about the final decision. You will have to do this manually via your own email. -The survey form has very limited functions. -Applications that are submitted but do not have transcripts and letters of recommendations show up as completed on the back-end. You will have to go through every submitted application to make sure they have completed 100% of your requirements. This again takes a lot of time to go through if you have a lot of applicants. These are just some of the things the system is unable to do.

Reason for choosing Submittable

We will be switching to a different platform later this year.

Review Source

TS

Tamia S.  
College and Career Counselor  
Education Management  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Everything we wanted and more!"

October 30, 2024

5.0

Great! The customer service was awesome and the product itself is everything we wanted and more.

Pros

Having everything needed/wanted in one website; as well as, the quick response time when I had a questions or concern.

Cons

I like everything about WizeHive and understand the process they use for their users.

Switched from

[Jotform](https://www.capterra.com/p/158456/JotForm-4-0/)

Didn't have everything we needed for both users and admins.

Review Source

JS

Jennifer S.  
Scholarship Manager, Digital Specialist  
Non-Profit Organization Management  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "My Zengine Experience with WizeHive"

November 17, 2023

5.0

It has been wonderful. I've launched my share of platforms in my career and this was as well-planned, structured, and executed as any of the best I've experienced.

Pros

I like everything about WizeHive, but hands down the cherry on top was our implementation lead, \[sensitive content hidden\]. Maybe all the leads are exactly the same -- I hope so, for the sake of everyone else -- but the success of our platform and launch is credited to the team leader. I cannot say enough good things about his intelligence to build, troubleshoot, test, reconfigure, and train me all while thinking of our needs, what we would need next, and what I didn't yet know. His technical talent is matched by his patience and priority of wanting our foundation and me to be set up for success from start to finish. I got that impression also in my calls with \[sensitive content hidden\]; instead of giving me bullet points of all things WizeHive, he asked questions about what we had, what we needed, what we wanted, and what we saw as our future needs. \[sensitive content hidden\] seems to be on that same wagon and I am thrilled to have the support system for this product.

Cons

I can't really think of anything I would consider a con. I would have liked to know more going in, but our foundation's timeline did not allow -- we were coming up on our next scholarship cycle and there was no time to waste -- but having training modules is very helpful. I refer back to them and hope they keep coming.

Reason for choosing Submittable

The best fit -- I looked at who had education foundations as clients, worked with scholarships and grants similar to ours, I was impressed with the amount of control and advanced reporting we would be able to do, and I thought it would work well being updated each year as we restructure our scholarship process.

Switched from

[Jotform](https://www.capterra.com/p/158456/JotForm-4-0/)[eForms Mobile](https://www.capterra.com/p/183886/eForms-Mobile/)

The last one we used was EForms and, as wonderful as the developer was, it did not work. At all -- no filtering candidates or matching, so we had to do hundreds manually, we were limited on assigning reviewers, no guarantee every application was seen by at least one reviewer, etc. The year prior to 2023 was wrought with issues and I think they ran out of time to rebuild for 2023 -- we were not involved on the back end and could not do anything in the system. 180° from what we can do in Zengine.

Review Source

RSS

Renee Sanders S.  
Senior Marine Scientist  
Environmental Services  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "Positive Experience with WizeHive - Excellent training, support, and resources"

June 17, 2024

5.0

Working with WizeHive has been a quality experience that has made grant and program management much easier for our team. We are thrilled to be working together over the next few years on our current program and look forward to looking for other efforts we could incorporate WizeHive into in the future. Administrators, applicants, and reviewers all report positive experiences with using WizeHive.

Pros

WizeHive has proven to be a wonderful solution for our program. We are currently running a large multi-year grant funding competition and needed a system that could meet our needs for proposal collection, application review, reporting, and other elements of grant management. WizeHive has been a perfect fit. The training experience with \[sensitive content hidden\] was excellent. \[sensitive content hidden\] always answered questions thoroughly and quickly solved problems as we worked together to create our first fully-functioning application portal. During our application acceptance period, no applicants reported having any issues with the WizeHive system. Everything worked so smoothly! Reviewers have also had a smooth experience while reviewing applications. The support staff is also quick to response with helpful resources.

Cons

It would be nice if we could have the capacity to allow multiple files to be uploaded in one question in an application where relevant.

Alternatives considered

[Submittable](https://www.capterra.com/p/158382/Submittable/)

Reason for choosing Submittable

WizeHive covered all of our team's needs without changing pricing or making us leery of what felt like being over-promised by other companies.

Review Source

KW

Kristen W.  
Director of Grantmaking  
Non-Profit Organization Management  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Wize Way to Manage: A Grant Management Game Changer"

June 5, 2024

5.0

Overall, I'm delighted with WizeHive and would highly recommend the NextZen platform to anyone seeking a reliable, user-friendly, and comprehensive grant management solution. By investing in this technology, we will elevate the experience for all stakeholders within our organization and ensure that our processes and tools reflect our grantee partnership objectives.

Pros

What I appreciate most was the intuitive dashboard menu, which will allow our organization to effortlessly track and manage our grants. The interface for admin staff, external reviewer, and grantees is easy to navigate. The robust reporting features offer valuable insights, enabling us to make data-driven decisions and optimize our grant management process. The customizable workflows have allowed us to tailor the system to our unique needs, which we believe will result in enhanced efficiency. Additionally, I am impressed by the exceptional customer support provided by the WizeHive team, who are always responsive and helpful as I've needed assistance during the onboarding process.

Cons

While I'm extremely pleased with our WizeHive subscription, we encountered some drawbacks during the onboarding process. Specifically, I discovered a few features mentioned in our initial sales call were not part of our subscription package and would require an additional fee, which was prohibitively expensive for our small organization. Also, some key functionalities that tipped the scales for us in favor of WizeHive over other grant management systems are not yet available but are expected to be added in future updates.

Alternatives considered

[Submittable](https://www.capterra.com/p/158382/Submittable/)[Fluxx Grantmaker](https://www.capterra.com/p/146625/Fluxx-Software-for-Grantmakers/)[GivingData](https://www.capterra.com/p/166229/GivingData/)

Reason for choosing Submittable

When selecting a new grant management system, alignment with our established organization goals was paramount. Given our average grantee is 70+ years old, we prioritized diversity, equity, and inclusion to ensure the readability for those with vision impairments. DEI within the platform is crucial as we expand our grantmaking outreach to include Spanish and Vietnamese speaking applicants, who could apply in their native language, with seamless review capabilities for English-speaking reviewers. Furthermore, we needed to streamline administrative workflows to maintain our output with a lean staff. And perhaps most importantly, we sought a partnership with a company that shares our philanthropic values, ensuring a united vision for our grantmaking efforts.

Switched from

[Blackbaud Grantmaking](https://www.capterra.com/p/242266/Blackbaud-Grantmaking/)

Our grantees often struggled to navigate the platform, leading to a surge in technical support requests related to applications, grant agreements, and final reports which placed an additional burden on administrative staff. Our external reviewers occasionally faced difficulty using their designated portal, further highlighting the need for additional support resources. The system was prone to errors and lacked follow-through on promised updates that were announced during town hall meetings.

Review Source

DJ

Daniel J.  
Associate Director  
Non-Profit Organization Management  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Great customer service and fast setup"

October 18, 2023

5.0

This product has significantly reduced the administrative time we spend on grantmaking. We have more than earned back the cost of the license in time saved.

Pros

We had a last-minute need for an online granting process and needed an affordable tool where we could get everything running quickly with minimal input from our end. Even though their development times are typically longer, they were willing to adapt to our timeline and still delivered the forms a week earlier! Throughout the entire process, their support team has been amazing--always available, always happy to help and incredibly fast to turn things around. We hardly had to do any of the development ourselves, despite this being a last-minute request. As a small team with limited spare capacity, this was a lifesaver in being able to keep to our grantmaking timeline.

Cons

While the functionalities are enough for most organizations' granting needs, there are a few customization options, such as greater flexibility with repeating questions, which we would have liked. However, the support team helped us find acceptable workarounds.

Alternatives considered

[SurveyMonkey Apply](https://www.capterra.com/p/123374/SurveyMonkey-Apply/)[Submittable](https://www.capterra.com/p/158382/Submittable/)[Optimy](https://www.capterra.com/p/142236/Optimy/)

Reason for choosing Submittable

Wisehive was one of the less expensive options, and unlike the other options in the price tier, offered hands-on support to get our program up and running. Their sales team was also much more thorough in understanding our needs and were honest about what they could and couldn't deliver. Although we had a cheaper option, we decided to go with Wisehive because of the support we would receive and our positive interaction with the sales team.

Review Source

AL

Amelia L.  
Inspire Olympia Senior Program Specialist  
Government Administration  
Used the software for: 1-2 years

### "Submittable makes things run smoothly "

February 4, 2026

5.0

Great! Submittable helps me do my job in a way I couldn't without it. From the implementation support to, to regular product updates, it just keeps getting easier to use.

Pros

It's super easy to use for my team as a funder and for our grant applicants. It has streamlined the review process that helps keep our funding running smoothly throughout the year.

Cons

I wish the advanced reporting were a little more user-friendly, but that is being updated regularly to support what we need as users.

Review Source

KS

Karey S.  
Associate Director of Experiential Learning  
Higher Education  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "Efficient, customizable grant management tool"

December 10, 2025

5.0

My team uses Submittable to manage a grant/scholarship process. We receive approximately 200 applications and coordinate a review team of 12 people to award in the ballpark of $100,000 a year. Compared to other tools I've used, Submittable makes it easier and faster to create projects, improves our administrative workflow, and creates a better experience for applicants.

Pros

Submittable allows us to both accept submissions and integrate custom review and scoring and manage reviewers all in the same portal. I love the customization features and the user experience for applicants, reviewers, and administrators.

Cons

I wish there were a way to set a deadline for reference forms to be received. This isn't a major sore spot, but it would save some administrative headaches.

Review Source

AF

Autumn F.  
Scholarship Coordinator  
Philanthropy  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "More functionality and excellent support! "

December 9, 2020

4.0

For us, this software will literally replace a person. The time it will save us in data collection and processing alone is worth every penny. We are thrilled to have found a software that meets our specific needs and will help us be able to help more single mothers!

Pros

From the demo to go live the people at WizeHive have been great to work with! The implementation team has been fantastic to work with. They are knowledgeable, patient, attentive and have been willing to do the lion share of the work when building out forms and customizing rules. Any time we have ran into a roadblock, the implementation team worked to find a suitable solution or workaround They have also used their experience to be proactive about helping us avoid pitfalls of setting up software in ways that might be challenging down the road. When you are going into new software, you don't know what you don't know... but they took the time to understand and listen to what we were trying to accomplish and consulted with us on the best use of the software why some of our ideas may not have been the best long term! It was refreshing to work with a knowledgeable team who was invested in our success!

Cons

If I had to name a con, it would be some limitations with customizing the user interface. I would have liked to make the user experience a bit more friendly or modern. (fonts, layout, colors, etc) But in all my research into other software platforms it was a trade off, you could have a more sleek or custom user interface but not as much functionality. In the end functionality was more important to us which is why we choose WizeHive.

Alternatives considered

[SmarterSelect](https://www.capterra.com/p/140270/SmarterSelect/)[SurveyMonkey Apply](https://www.capterra.com/p/123374/SurveyMonkey-Apply/)[Salesforce Sales Cloud](https://www.capterra.com/p/61368/Salesforce/)

Reason for choosing Submittable

Functionality and feature set, specifically the reporting and dashboard capability.

Review Source

AK

Akif K.  
Electrical-Electronics Engineer  
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Submittable Review"

January 9, 2025

5.0

Submittable makes our submission progress easier.

Pros

The software is user friendly and customization of apps is great.

Cons

It is difficult to identify a time and this causes missing submissions sometimes.

Review Source

Response from Submittable

January 13, 2025

Thank you for your feedback! We love seeing that Submittable is making your submission progress easier and that is user friendly! For your missing submission issue, we encourage you to reach out to your support team!

AS

Amanda S.  
Performance Management Analyst  
Non-Profit Organization Management  
Used the software for: 1-2 years

### "Review of WizeHive for Application and Grant Management"

September 15, 2023

5.0

Overall, we have had a positive experience with WizeHive. The staff are responsive to our needs, and take the time to understand what we need from the system in order to meet our goals. As noted about, our implementation lead went "over and above" in developing customize forms/processes to help our grant making process go as smoothly as possible. He also took a lot of time ensure our organization's staff were well trained on how to use the system.

Pros

We used WizeHive to manage several different application processes, and a grant management/reimbursement process. For the application process, we liked that both the application and the review process was built into the system, allowing for a more streamlined process for both applicants and reviewers. We also liked that the forms and fields were customizable to ensure we were collecting the information we needed.For our grant management/reimbursement process, we had an extra level of complexity to what we needed the system to do given how we reimbursed our grantees. Our WizeHive implementation lead worked with us to understand how to set up the system to best meet our needs and customized various forms and processes within the system to meet those needs.

Cons

One feature we think would be helpful is if there is a way that applicant organizations could allow multiple staff within their organization to access their organization's applications or reimbursement forms. Currently, an organization is limited to one username/password to access their application portal. Unless the organization shares that username/password with others within their agency, this means that they are limited to only one particular individual having access. It would also be helpful if the system allow an organization to have an overall organization account, and then within that account access various funding oppournities. Presently, each funding opportunity essentially requires a different account. As we have the same agencies that apply for various funding opportunities, they have to create (and remember) different log-in information for each separate funding opportunity.

Reason for choosing Submittable

price and product features

Review Source

NT

Natalie T.  
Grant Manager  
Non-Profit Organization Management  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "FIRST Washington Robotics Grant Management"

October 27, 2023

5.0

I think the ability to streamline and automate our grant using WizeHive made the process move faster, allowing us to get funding out to our applicants sooner! Having all the information that we needed for this grant housed in one place made is super easy and efficient for me to keep my 300 plus applications, that were in various stages of the grant process, organized!

Pros

The product was easy to use, and our implementation lead \[sensitive content hidden\] was amazing! He did a great job of making sure that the product was customized for our needs. He also did a great job of making sure that we were comfortable with using the software for not only managing our grant but creating or editing our custom forms and templates. Having the option to use different folders and the auto emails that were generated when an application moved to a new folder was super helpful in automating our grant process and keeping our applicants informed.

Cons

The biggest thing that we got negative feedback about was the inability to have multiple users access the same application. Having someone that is an admin user and could grant user access to another person would be helpful or if there were a way to allow multiple users to access the same application. We have a situation where there are sometimes multiple people involved in the application process and they were frustrated by the inability to all have access the application.

Review Source

CS

Christie S.  
Scholarship Manager  
Non-Profit Organization Management  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "I love Submittable!"

September 14, 2022

5.0

As I learn more about the software and the tools you have, it really has made the process overall from launch of the scholarship season, to the close and then the information from the system is essential for marketing to potential future donors.

Pros

I am very used to having to learn new software, through out my positions in the last several years. The reason I love Submittable, not because it's easy for me, BUT BECAUSE it's easy for submitters and judges to use. If I had to review the how-to's prior to every season to a new set of judges, it would take so much time and energy. That only is worth the fees we pay!

Cons

I do wish the forms had a little more ability to make them a bit prettier to look at. The size of the fonts is either super small, or HUGE. It would be nice to make the page look a bit prettier and closer in line with our branding.

Review Source

AA

Angela A.  
Development Specialist  
Non-Profit Organization Management  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "Simple to use - self explanatory"

August 31, 2023

5.0

My overall experience has been a good one. The best experience I have is when I can speak with a person at Wizehive for what are complicated questions that I have. It's hard to express your issues in a support ticket, because of that you don't always get the right answers and have to keep asking thru the support ticket. If you could speak with someone, they better understand what you're trying to do and your issues.

Pros

That the applicant can log in to their application and see what they did last year, they can also see where their application is in the process, emails are simple to send and you have control over the emails being sent

Cons

I wish that Wizehive had an 800 number - a number you can call and speak with someone. I don't like that I have to send an email stressing that I need to talk to someone. Speaking with a live person is so very helpful and it's the one thing that I feel Wizehive is lacking...in a big way

Reason for choosing Submittable

I was not working at the company when they chose Wizehive - it was already installed when I started.

Review Source

DX

David X.  
Data & Research Executive  
Financial Services  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "Creative & Efficient Grant Management System"

August 29, 2023

5.0

Pros

The innate ability to create forms effortlessly is amplified by customization, resulting in a streamlined process. This fosters a unique data capture structure, enhancing efficiency in processing and operations.Customizable forms cater to diverse data collection needs, ensuring a seamless, tailored experience. This dynamic interaction doesn't compromise processing coherence; rather, it harmonizes customization with structured data handling, facilitating efficient downstream operations. This synergy optimizes information management, boosting operational agility and data-driven success.

Cons

Consider enhancing integration with external documents, including the option for in-house signatures, thus reducing reliance on third-party applications.

Review Source

SS

Sharon S.  
Associate Director of Summer Enrollment  
Education Management  
Used the software for: 1-2 years

### "Great versatile software "

July 23, 2023

5.0

We have used Submittable to collect forms for auditions and I like that the faculty and coaches are able to review and evaluate the student in the platform. We have also used it to collect event information.

Pros

I like that you can use this platform for any different reasons and you can create many different forms so that you can really customize them for the right purpose.

Cons

At the moment there is not anything I dislike.

Reason for choosing Submittable

Best option available

Review Source

AD

Andrew D.  
Director of Education  
Non-Profit Organization Management  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Happy with Application Management System"

August 15, 2024

5.0

So far, everything is going well with the application management system

Pros

The ability to customize application processes for our unique/specific needs

Cons

Some of the software architecture it limiting

Review Source

HG

Holly G.  
Senior Director of Programs  
Education Management  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "We use WizeHive for a variety of application needs"

September 15, 2023

5.0

Pros

WizeHive offers seamless language translation features; you just select the language(s) you need and everything is automatically translated for you! Another feature we love is the document generator. This feature helps us customize our award letters and payment invoices.

Cons

Having WYSIWYG capabilities in the auto-email function would be a terrific upgrade.

Reason for choosing Submittable

We chose WizeHive as our solution partner because they offered the customizable features we needed for a great price. We have worked with WizeHive for three years and each year, we make continuous improvements to our process. WizeHive partners with us in our improvement cycle, listening to our needs and feedback and helping us craft the best solution possible. Our Implementation Specialist was great to work with!

Review Source

KW

Kayleen W.  
Program Manager  
Non-Profit Organization Management  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Scholarship Implimentation Review"

April 19, 2024

5.0

Overall, it was a great experience and liked how the trainings were saved in our folder.

Pros

Live in-person training during the implemenation phase. The implementation lead was able to change/edit things along the way in both of our scholarship portals.

Cons

We were not able to use one portal for the scholarships we have.

Reason for choosing Submittable

Another scholarship program was already using this product and recommended it because of the ease to track students.

Review Source

BD

Brooke D.  
Manager of Cultural Programs  
Government Administration  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "Love the Ease of Sumittable"

February 20, 2024

5.0

We've loved our experience with the Submittable team. They system and the team continue to impress us.

Pros

Great Customer Service - and ease of the system for both applicant and reviewer are fantastic

Cons

wish they had a more comprehensive CRM - which this is in the beta stage, it doesn't work for us because we do not require our applicants to have a UEI or be a non-profit.

Review Source

EH

Emily H.  
Program Manager  
Education Management  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "Manage applications & team workflows with Wizehive"

February 23, 2024

5.0

Pros

The best part about Wizehive was being able to create a custom workflow and experience for my team's diverse needs. Using Wizehive allowed us to put 3 different workflows, used by 3 different teams/roles all in one place. And the experience for the user is a lot easier than other systems for processing applications.

Cons

The only thing I didn't like was testing out the views for different roles within my workspace. It makes it hard to train other teams when their views look different than an admin view and I can't toggle back and forth but instead have to start playing with incognito windows, permissions, fake email addresses etc

Review Source

MH

Melissa H.  
Research Program director  
Wine and Spirits  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Customization"

October 13, 2023

4.0

The training and customer service was excellent. All WizeHIve representatives were professional, knowledgeable and enjoyable to work with.

Pros

The development and training process. WizeHive spent time to learn our program and system before suggesting ways to set up the grant management steps. We were able to tweak it as it was developed to better align the existing process with the online portal.

Cons

Not being able to download proposal and report templates from the WizeHive portal. Users must visit another website to download templates.

Reason for choosing Submittable

WizeHive was responsible for building out the program and not me. They were creative to find a way to combine three programs into one to minimize the cost. Follow up customer service.

Review Source

MR

Michael R.  
Team Lead  
Semiconductors  
Used the software for: 1-2 years

### "Bright Funds - The Easy way to Donate"

February 16, 2024

5.0

Overall positive and has great potential to add even more value

Pros

Verified Charities Ease of use Corporate Sponsored Volunteer Opportunities

Cons

Creating groups and tracking donations is not easiest and lacks some details and functionality that would help

Review Source

## Send me user reviews about this product

### Fill out the form and we'll send a list of the top-rated software based on real user reviews directly to your inbox.

Talk to a Capterra advisor for free and get results within 15 minutes.