Capterra Logo
Helping businesses choose better software since 1999
SolidFire

SolidFire

3.8 (5)
Capterra offers objective, independent research and verified user reviews. We may earn a referral fee when you visit a vendor through our links.
Review

"Solidfire Admin/User"

4.0

Joby K. - Senior Storage EngineerApril 2, 2019

STARTING PRICE

$120


per feature

Free Trial
Available

What is SolidFire?

All-flash storage tool which enables elimination of refresh cycles through a cloud infrastructure.

Do you work for SolidFire?Claim this product profile

Compare with a popular alternative

SolidFire

3.8 (5)
SolidFire

VS.

USD $120.00
Not provided by the vendor
Starting Price
Free Version
Free Trial
Free Version
Free Trial
Pricing Options
1
2
Total Features
0
0
Total Integrations
4.0 (5)
4.0 (1)
Ease Of Use
3.2 (5)
4.0 (1)
Value For Money
4.3 (5)
4.0 (1)
Customer Service

Green rating bars show the winning product based on the average rating and number of reviews.

Other great alternatives to SolidFire

Ease of Use
4.5
Customer Service
4.0
Features
5.0
Value for Money
3.5
Mesosphere

Mesosphere

0.0 (0)
Ease of Use
0.0
Customer Service
0.0
Features
0.0
Value for Money
0.0
Ease of Use
0.0
Customer Service
0.0
Features
0.0
Value for Money
0.0

SolidFire Reviews

Showing all 5 reviews
Overall
3.8
Ease of Use
4.0
Customer Service
4.3

Most Helpful Reviews for SolidFire

Joby K. avatar
Joby K.
Senior Storage Engineer
Computer Hardware, 1,001-5,000 employees
Used the software for: 2+ years
Overall Rating
4.0
Ease of Use
4.0
Customer Service
4.0
Features
3.0
Value for Money
4.0
Likelihood to Recommend
8/10
Reviewer Source
Source: Capterra
April 2, 2019

"Solidfire Admin/User"

Overall: It can get better, not so easy to troubleshoot performance/latency issues.

Pros: Easy to Configure and use the hardware and software.

Cons: Limitation on the size of the LUN on cluster

Verified Reviewer
Beleidsadviseur ICT
Utilities, 51-200 employees
Used the software for: Less than 6 months
Overall Rating
5.0
Ease of Use
4.0
Features
4.0
Value for Money
4.0
Likelihood to Recommend
8/10
Reviewer Source
Source: Capterra
July 17, 2019

"Fast Storage For VDI"

Overall: We use Solidfire for VDI and later for server storage as well.

Pros: The storage is fast - SSD only. Everything is deduplicated and compressed on the fly, so the net storage is much more than you would expect based on physical storage. Integration in vCenter is done with a plugin showing graphics.

Cons: Setting up SSO in the admin interface is not easy to accomplish. Also there is no migration path from NetApp FAS to Solidfire with regards to all functionality (Solidfire does not offer CIFS out of the box).

Switched From: MetroCluster
Reasons for Switching to SolidFire: Speed
Proby P. avatar
Proby P.
Enterprise Storage Engineer
Financial Services, 10,001+ employees
Used the software for: 2+ years
Overall Rating
3.0
Ease of Use
3.0
Customer Service
5.0
Features
3.0
Value for Money
2.0
Likelihood to Recommend
5/10
Reviewer Source
Source: Capterra
January 21, 2020

"Good for simple use cases and QoS features are solid"

Overall: Great solutions architects ([SENSITIVE CONTENT HIDDEN] is solid!) Great support - had a very positive experience working with them during our HCI POC. With the advancements Element OS has recently made, I would look at re-POC'ing and testing this product for mission-critical enterprise workloads again.

Pros: QoS Features are good for the price you pay for the storage array. The Flex cabling is definitely required as our initial deployment was a huge cable burden that we didn't plan for. Also Element OS is getting better form an enterprise ready standpoint. GUI is intuitive and easy to use and the scale out functionality is solid along with it's redundancy, high-availability, and RAID features.

Cons: When we deployed 2+ years ago, we ran into an issue with VMware that we weren't able to get past, which ultimately made us abandon the product. Also, the QoS features are not adaptive (Like NetApp ONTAP aQoS - adaptive QoS.)

Reasons for Choosing SolidFire: Cost, deployment, use cases, Support agreement with NetApp, QoS features
Reasons for Switching to SolidFire: Segregate specific mission-critical enterprise workloads onto their own platform to not affected the shared workloads on the NetApp ONTAP arrays.
Adrian M. avatar
Adrian M.
Senior Storage Engineer
51-200 employees
Used the software for: 1-2 years
Overall Rating
5.0
Ease of Use
5.0
Customer Service
5.0
Features
5.0
Value for Money
5.0
Likelihood to Recommend
10/10
Reviewer Source
Source: Capterra
April 18, 2018

"I'm a partner in the Caribbean certified to install "

Overall: improve the business efficiency by the integration with VVOLS

Pros: the installation and deployment is super easy, configuration add on and hot replacement is super fast, no raid is required and the integration with cloud is fantastic I really like to install this product, make the cloud business more easy to growth and be profitable in a short term.

Cons: the only think that I don't like is that you can't make the whole performance in a single resource, but that's why is only dedicated for cloud platform, is the requirement is performance on a single load this is not your product the target is different

Verified Reviewer
Cloud Infrastructure Engineer
Computer Networking, 10,001+ employees
Used the software for: 2+ years
Overall Rating
2.0
Ease of Use
4.0
Customer Service
3.0
Features
2.0
Value for Money
1.0
Likelihood to Recommend
3/10
Reviewer Source
Source: Capterra
July 28, 2021

"Not impressed with SolidFire"

Overall: Deployment of the product was fairly simple but the product could not deliver on the scale that we needed. We had high hopes for the product but we experienced a lot of outages and would not choose this product if we had the chance to do it over again.

Pros: What we liked most about the software was the user interface and the tight API integration. All of the same functionality available in the GUI is available via CLI and there is a good amount of documentation available.

Cons: We had many problems with this solution -- especially when it comes to meeting the marketed/promised scale numbers. When one node fails there are far reaching impacts which can only be understood by opening/working with support on a support case. Assignment of support engineers is slow. The product is also very expensive and the licensing model is very confusing.

Alternatives Considered: Pure1