Inbenta Knowledge Management

4 / 5 1 review

Who Uses This Software?

Our customers vary across all industry verticals but share a common demand for an easy-to-deploy knowledge management solution that can reduce incoming support tickets & increase customer satisfaction.

Average Ratings

1 Review
  • 4 / 5
  • 4 / 5
    Ease of Use
  • 3 / 5
    Customer Service

Product Details

  • Starting Price
    Not provided by vendor
  • Free Demo
  • Deployment
    Cloud, SaaS, Web
  • Training
    Live Online
  • Support
    Business Hours

Vendor Details

  • Inbenta
  • Founded 2005
  • United States

About Inbenta Knowledge Management

Inbenta's AI-powered solution connects directly to your existing knowledge base for seamless management and on-going optimization. With detailed search analytics, you'll be able to identify search trends, determine new unanswered questions that need to be created in your knowledge base, track progress and performance, and optimize the customer journey to simplify the search process.

Inbenta Knowledge Management Features

  • Cataloging / Categorization
  • Collaboration
  • Content Management
  • Data Management
  • Discussion Boards
  • Document Management
  • FAQ
  • Full Text Search
  • Guided Problem Solving
  • Self Service Portal
  • Self-Learning

Inbenta Knowledge Management Reviews Recently Reviewed!

Game changer !

Dec 12, 2017
4 / 5
Ease of Use
4 / 5
Features & Functionality
3 / 5
Customer Support
3 / 5
Value for Money
Likelihood to Recommend: 8.0/10 Not

Pros: love the deflection tool to reduce the number of tickets submitted, because it prompts the customer to really consider if they can find their answer on their own. I also love how i can test the way an article appears to the public before it does in the backstage testing area. I love how easy it was for us to get up and running - from migrating old articles from Zendesk, to creating new ones, to putting it on our site, and later to creating a Spanish database as well. The back end analytics are so critical for us to know if we need to create a new article or if the way we've written it does not match up with how people are posing a question. For example, we had people saying "no sound" or "audio not working" while our article referred to "microphone settings." We quickly rectified that and watched the number of Items Found increase, Items Not Found decrease, and successful deflections increase.

Cons: The auto-filler is not quite as sophisticated as I'd like. The HTML editor could be improved. It's basic and does the job, but it would be great to control the look and feel a little more, especially with technical charts and comparison columns.