Best For

Companies with web applications that need automated tests that change with their app and require little upkeep while providing comprehensive insights.

Product Details

ML-driven test automation solution that automatically maintains tests and identifies regressions for you.

Contact Details

mabl

https://www.mabl.com

Founded in 2017

Located in United States

Starting Price

  • Not provided by vendor
  • Cost is per workspace, multiple users can contribute to a single workspace.

Platform

  • Installed - Mac
  • Cloud, SaaS, Web
  • Installed - Windows
  • Mobile - iOS Native
  • Mobile - Android Native

Training

  • In Person
  • Live Online
  • Webinars
  • Documentation

Support

  • Business Hours
  • Online

mabl Features

Hierarchical View
Move & Copy
Parameterized Testing
Requirements-Based Testing
Security Testing
Supports Parallel Execution
Test Script Reviews
Unicode Compliance

mabl Reviews

Overall
4/5
Ease of Use
4/5
Customer Service
4.5/5

Showing Most Helpful

Showing 50 of 65 reviews

Showing Most Helpful

Showing 50 of 65 reviews

Sort by:

Filter By:

Rating
Company Size
Reviewer's Role
Length of Use
Frequency of Use
Verified Reviewer
Computer Software, 201-500 employees
Used the software for: I used a free trial
Overall Rating
5/5
Ease of Use
3/5
Customer Service
3/5
Features
4/5
Likelihood to Recommend
8/10
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
July 24, 2019

“Young Automation souloution with great potential”

OverallWhat attracted us was the self healing plugin and also the ease of creating new tests for our colleagues without programming knowledge. Although the design looked really new and flashy it was hard to find what you need at first, especially while being in the tutorial. I do think however that if they focus on making the test creation even easier and more reliable (through self helaing or whatever else) that they do have a great chance on the automation market! Ultimately we didnt choose them since my old company didnt want to invest a lot of money into QA.
ProsThe Tutorial should help you create all your needed basic tests and is helping you run them periodically with suggestions. A fresh UI and design approach.
ConsAt first everything was a bit overwhelming, even though there was a tutorial. I wanted to check something so i exited one exercise and wasnt able to get back into it later. Getting the local tunnel to work was really stressfull, i didnt find or overlook the info that java11 was needed and the support people didnt have a clue that you need a specific version so we wasted almost our whole trial with getting that to work. To be fair it was prolonged after i contacted them though!
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
July 24, 2019
Avatar Image
Siddhant W.
Product Manager
Information Technology and Services, 51-200 employees
Used the software for: Less than 6 months
Overall Rating
5/5
Ease of Use
5/5
Customer Service
5/5
Features
5/5
Value for Money
4/5
Likelihood to Recommend
9/10
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
October 21, 2018

“Simplest and best automation tool using machine learning for testing”

ProsThis is one of the simplest tools for software testing purpose. It helps to automate web browsers like Selenium IDE and Selenium WebDriver and other such automation tools. mabl is a really great platform as it is lightweight and a simple browser plugin that does the work. No heavy sized software download, even though a great tool. It is the only automation tool recently built that has an outstanding feature that I personally love the most and can benefit most organizations if used in the correct manner. The feature of auto-healing using machine learning concepts, as it helps the automation scripts to run even if there is a big UI change in the product code. This tool doesn't require any tester or developer to know to code and can write scriptless code by simply fetching data based on the user's actions performed. Once the journey and plans are ready, it is really simple to execute them and trigger them in a timely fashion. It provide great visuals and monitors anomalies too! It keeps a track of network spikes and tracks performance of the platform. It has the functionality to trigger mails to concerned people via Slack and mail integrations. Any bugs encountered can be easily handled and can be synced with tools like Bamboo, JIRA, Jenkins, etc. I would personally recommend people to use this as it is THE CUTTING EDGE TOOL for future generations. I signed up for the product and got an instant demo from Preston, a test automation specialist at mabl, who did a wonderful job!
ConsNo cons presently, just loving the tool. I would really prefer if the tool was free of cost (open source) like Selenium and other automation tools. Life would be in our pockets and we would be called the AUTOMATION BOSSES of mabl using Machine learning.
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
October 21, 2018
Andrea W.
Director of Engineering
Information Technology and Services, 1001-5000 employees
Used the software for: 6-12 months
Overall Rating
5/5
Ease of Use
5/5
Customer Service
5/5
Features
4/5
Value for Money
5/5
Likelihood to Recommend
9/10
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018

“Finally, a tool that lives up to the hype and its ability to reduce automation maintenance overhead!”

OverallEasy to use.
ProsOverall, mabl is enabling our QA team to keep up with the product delivery pace of our dev and devops teams in the world of CI/CD (continuous integration/delivery). With the mabl trainer browser plug-in we are able to set up functional tests against our web application in minutes. Later, if we want to modify or enhance the tests, it's easy to make changes. Test capabilities are robust, including the ability to use javascript within the test. mabl is providing actionable insights about how the application is behaving, and we can see trends in failures or performance. We also like the image comparison capability which allows us to 'see' quickly why a test might have failed. New features are delivered at a rapid pace.
ConsThere are still some tests we can not port into mabl due to reliance on external systems (the ability to reach out from the system and affect an event outside of our application). For example, verify the receipt and contents of an email sent FROM our web application out to a test recipient inbox. We've given feedback to mabl to get our desired features onto the roadmap.
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018
Verified Reviewer
Computer Software, 51-200 employees
Used the software for: 1-2 years
Overall Rating
4/5
Ease of Use
4/5
Customer Service
4/5
Features
4/5
Value for Money
3/5
Likelihood to Recommend
7/10
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
August 2, 2019

“Simple, yet powerful”

OverallPreviously, with our selenium-based framework tests would take too long to write and maintain, which made it impossible to develop new e2e tests within sprints for the new features we were developing. With Mabl, we can quickly write tests so that we have UI automation coverage within the same sprint for new features.
ProsMabl has become the go-to for our e2e testing needs. Creation and maintenance of tests has become a breeze. Test failure investigation is quicker than before with detailed screenshots and HAR captures.
ConsMabl is not always able to handle tricker elements in our UI, which requires us to write custom JS steps or reach to to their support. Also, run-time of our tests is slower than our previous selenium-based tests.
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
August 2, 2019
John B.
Entrepreneur
Information Technology and Services, 1-10 employees
Used the software for: 6-12 months
Overall Rating
5/5
Ease of Use
5/5
Customer Service
5/5
Features
5/5
Value for Money
5/5
Likelihood to Recommend
10/10
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018

“Preeminent ML-driven test automation solution”

OverallSaves a lot of time as well as not having to have a developer spend countless hours every week doing the drudgery work which mabl takes care of for us.
ProsEasiest end-to-end machine learning driven test automation solution available which got us up and running on all of our apps. We just love getting the daily and informative emails keeping us all up to date on any new findings. Just an awesome app and I highly recommend anyone and everyone to quickly install mabl and let mabl run it's magic for your apps.
ConsThe only con we have seen so far is that the reported bad links includes a small subset of links that are not currently relevant, i.e. the links were valid at one time, but are not currently valid. But the report picks them up as broken which they are so it would be great if such links could easily be masked until they are re-used at some point in the future.
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018
Verified Reviewer
Computer Software, 201-500 employees
Used the software for: Less than 6 months
Overall Rating
4/5
Ease of Use
4/5
Customer Service
5/5
Features
4/5
Value for Money
4/5
Likelihood to Recommend
7/10
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018

“Useful test automation tool for monitoring website performance and checking broken links”

OverallLearned about a new and easy to use web monitoring tool which provides easy access to UI tests with with little setup time, but provides long term reporting on issues with an app.
ProsMabl provides a very straightforward user interface to set up an automated test which can perform smoke tests like checking all of the links on a page and report back all of the broken links. The learning curve is very small, so you can set up a new test in production in less than 10 minutes having never used the app before. It will send out a report by e-mail at your preferred interval with the test execution status, time, run time, pages checked, links checked and broken links.
ConsIt is quite bare bones as it is, if you already have complex API tests in Postman, Selenium IDE and Java/C# tests Jenkins, then Using Mabl in addition to these would really be nothing more than a novelty. Because your current unit tests and CI smoke tests probably provide ample code coverage. I would imagine the value from the mabl tests are aimed at a novice user with zero development background who needs basic website monitoring. Because you could probably get this data and more details on page exceptions from a tool like Datadog, Bugsnag or Kibana or Kubernetes. I would imagine that future iterations of the product will probably be more feature rich in these areas.
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018
Mike C.
QA Engineering Manager
Unspecified
Used the software for: Less than 6 months
Overall Rating
4/5
Ease of Use
5/5
Customer Service
5/5
Features
4/5
Value for Money
5/5
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018

“mabl has been solid for me in the brief time that I've used it.”

ProsOne of the ways by which I use mabl is for crawling pages, to look for broken links. mabl does an outstanding job of doing that, as well as reporting what it finds. I also like the mabl staff. They are very forthcoming in touching base with their user base to solicit feedback, answer questions, etc. Super responsive as well, which is huge for me, as when I evaluate tools for consideration, no matter how good they may be, if the customer service is bad, it's a deal breaker. You will not have that bad experience with mabl. Very solid documentation as well, which is not always the case with new companies. They are constantly updating it, as things change and/or new features are added.
ConsI would love to see the ability to schedule runs at selected days, times, etc. Also, what I hope is forthcoming from mabl, is the ability to tunnel into private test environments.
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018
Avatar Image
Ryan R.
Director Of Software Development
Information Services, 11-50 employees
Used the software for: Less than 6 months
Overall Rating
5/5
Ease of Use
3/5
Customer Service
5/5
Features
5/5
Value for Money
4/5
Likelihood to Recommend
10/10
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018

“Exactly what my company was looking for - but have a dev help set up tests”

OverallWe do frequent deployments of our web software, and this *finally* lets us build a library of regression tests in a user-friendly fashion... without relying on home-grown Selenium/Behat/Mink nightmares.
ProsI love the ability to capture journeys with the Trainer... it's a brilliant tool that makes setup incredibly fast. Also love the automatic regression testing, though that's created some "false alarms" for us in the past.
Cons1) It still requires a bit of web engineering background to set up *proper* tests. A tech-minded product manager may be able to create some basic "is the site up"-type tests, but nothing involving variables, authentication, etc. 2) Unless I'm missing something, variables don't seem to persist across journeys... which would be very useful. We create users on one web application, and then process them in another - so it'd be good to "follow" them through the entire workflow.
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018
Nikee P.
Software Engineer
Unspecified
Used the software for: 6-12 months
Overall Rating
5/5
Ease of Use
5/5
Customer Service
4/5
Features
4/5
Value for Money
5/5
Likelihood to Recommend
9/10
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018

“Overall, my experience has been positive. I recommend this product. ”

OverallA rapid automated testing has allowed us to fix issues that were caused during the development of other features of the platform.
ProsThe ability to set up test cases without writing a single line of code is incredible. Their ML approach is the key.
ConsHaven't found anything to not like as of yet. So far it meets our company's needs, it makes our testing process much quicker and automated.
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018
Karthik A.
QA Lead
Unspecified
Used the software for: 6-12 months
Overall Rating
4/5
Ease of Use
4/5
Customer Service
4/5
Features
5/5
Value for Money
5/5
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018

“Very promising next generation tool for web application testing ”

ProsThe auto-heal feature and the ability of the tool to traverse the entire application without much configuration.
ConsThe ability to modify and design test scripts. The mabl trainer can be little finicky and it is not very easy to delete and modify steps. Mabl trainer can use some improvements to its user interface.
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018
Avatar Image
Dono G.
Head Of QA
Banking, 51-200 employees
Used the software for: 1-2 years
Overall Rating
5/5
Ease of Use
5/5
Customer Service
5/5
Features
5/5
Value for Money
5/5
Likelihood to Recommend
10/10
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 20, 2019

“The future of automated front end testing”

OverallAbsolutely amazing tool and I personally believe it is the future of automated GUI testing. This tool will save software engineering teams many hours that has previously been spent on maintaining and debugging failing GUI tests.
ProsSo easy to use. Simple record and playback Has the option to go into more advanced assertions Great cross browser support Extremely stable tests The AI approach to adaptive assertions on tests
ConsStill quite new so some features are not there yet. Otherwise they are faultless for me
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 20, 2019
david s.
Director QA
Unspecified
Used the software for: 6-12 months
Overall Rating
5/5
Ease of Use
4/5
Customer Service
5/5
Features
3/5
Value for Money
5/5
Likelihood to Recommend
10/10
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 7, 2018

“This is a groundbreaking tool with the potential to seriously reduce automation UI maintenance”

Prospotential to eliminate the need for selenium and other ancient test tools that require high amounts of maintenance
Consinability to compare prod vs. dev (or across versions of software) for differences - we desperately need this to complete implementation
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 7, 2018
Salma N.
Quality Analyst
Unspecified
Used the software for: Unspecified
Overall Rating
4/5
Ease of Use
4/5
Customer Service
5/5
Features
5/5
Value for Money
5/5
Likelihood to Recommend
10/10
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 4, 2018

“Found it a very good testing software having all the basic functionalities covered. price worthy.”

ProsGood and easy to use environment. Have major testing functionalities. Quick feedback and suggestion service.
ConsI din't find any thing yet which seems least liking about this software. At first when it doesn't support multiple browsers that was the thing which hit me that what if I want to test on multi browser. but now it supports multi browsers too.
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 4, 2018
Suraj B.
Lead Quality Engineer
Unspecified
Used the software for: Less than 6 months
Overall Rating
3/5
Ease of Use
4/5
Customer Service
5/5
Features
3/5
Value for Money
5/5
Likelihood to Recommend
7/10
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018

“Better alternative for Selenium/Cucumber. ”

Pros1. Didn't break due to minor UI changes 2. Managing journeys, plans and their scheduling was easy 3. IP whitelisting, server authentications were very useful
Cons1. Many of the broken links were found. Again, there were no info about response time, request timeout duration, number of attempts made to open the links and status codes received. 2. There is no exclusion list for links which need not be checked for its correctness 3. It didn't identify the model pop-ups on click of a link as it was expecting a page 4. Not enough info on JS error/exceptions
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018
kannaki r.
QA manager
Health, Wellness and Fitness, 11-50 employees
Used the software for: Unspecified
Overall Rating
4/5
Ease of Use
5/5
Customer Service
4/5
Features
5/5
Value for Money
4/5
Likelihood to Recommend
8/10
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018

“mabl is easy to use for website testing and interface is very good”

Overallable to record the website and check for the images or broken links.
Pros1.Easy to use , not much complicated workflow. 2.Recording is easy and the errors are highlighted well to followup. 3.help document is thorough
Cons1.Tool is slow to load the scripts 2.Failed cases not explaining exactly why it fails 3.Unable to inter-grate with testcases
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018
yogendra babu G.
Test Lead
Unspecified
Used the software for: Unspecified
Overall Rating
4/5
Ease of Use
5/5
Customer Service
4/5
Features
4/5
Value for Money
4/5
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018

“It is a fabulous automation tool which helps testing ease”

ProsEasily configurable. Friendly User Interface. Auto test case generation. Test execution scheduling which is hectic job in other automation tools.
ConsEnabling local testing helps lot more partners to join. Better Test data management will help run the data driven tests
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018
Prashant Y.
Software tester
Computer Software, 1-10 employees
Used the software for: I used a free trial
Overall Rating
4/5
Ease of Use
4/5
Customer Service
4/5
Features
4/5
Value for Money
4/5
Likelihood to Recommend
8/10
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
July 16, 2019

“Very good application in fast changing world of testing.”

OverallThe experience is good, it's the need of the current time.
ProsNo need to maintain ever changing locators, one of the best part of the machine learning based application.
ConsLess exposure towards writing own code leading to less customisation.
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
July 16, 2019
Pete C.
Senior Engineer & Engineering Team Lead
Unspecified
Used the software for: Less than 6 months
Overall Rating
5/5
Ease of Use
4/5
Customer Service
5/5
Features
4/5
Value for Money
5/5
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018

“We've only run a few simple tests, and mabl has been a pleasure to use.”

ProsThe ease of use for non-technical employees. Our QA team member, who is just learning her craft and does not know how to write JavaScript based tests, has been able to jump in and create a few journeys that help show the power and value mabl will bring to our company.
ConsIt is still a young product, and does not have all of teh flexibility and functionality of the more mature options.
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018
Verified Reviewer
Computer Software, 11-50 employees
Used the software for: 6-12 months
Overall Rating
5/5
Ease of Use
5/5
Customer Service
5/5
Features
5/5
Value for Money
5/5
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018

“Mabl is a very innovative idea and it makes testing not stink”

ProsPersonally, I hate writing test automation and this makes it way easier. Tests no longer become brittle over time and Mabl adapts to changing UIs. It's also super easy to implement into your CI/CD pipeline.
ConsInitially I struggled with getting it to test web apps behind corporate firewalls but this was fixed when I could whitelist the Mabl IP addresses. The UI takes a bit of getting used to as well in terms of navigation.
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018
James H.
Engineering Manager
Unspecified
Used the software for: Less than 6 months
Overall Rating
4/5
Ease of Use
5/5
Customer Service
4/5
Features
5/5
Value for Money
3/5
Likelihood to Recommend
8/10
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018

“Easy to set up, the recorder is great”

ProsBeing able to record your actions and then have it learn from those is great. It was easy to have the jobs run on a schedule or on a build
ConsLittle iffy on the pricing compared to a lot of open source software in this space plus your choice of CI tool. I think if they can make it easy to apply to complicated products and tie into a larger codebase it could be really interesting
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018
Avatar Image
masha m.
Software QA Lead
51-200 employees
Used the software for: Less than 6 months
Overall Rating
5/5
Ease of Use
4/5
Customer Service
5/5
Features
4/5
Value for Money
3/5
Likelihood to Recommend
10/10
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018

“Smart automated testing ”

Overallmabls daily execution of tests and use of machine learning have helped me better understand which tests are most helpful in assessing the usability of my company's web-based software products.
ProsInsights are given on each test that is ran, the UI is nice on the eyes and easy to navigate. Getting up and running tests on mabl is painless and quick. The customization of tests and trainer is fairly easy to use. Test metrics are reported in a beautiful layout, and issues are easy to spot.
ConsLike any automation software, once you start building out a test plan in their system, you become locked in and dependent on them for running tests. But the time that it saves compared to building up an automation suite from scratch using open source software might be worth the price.
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018
Avatar Image
Robert A.
Project Manager
Unspecified
Used the software for: 6-12 months
Overall Rating
5/5
Ease of Use
5/5
Customer Service
5/5
Features
5/5
Value for Money
5/5
Likelihood to Recommend
9/10
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018

“Affordable way to run automated testing and validations”

OverallReduction in manual testing of functionality.
ProsVery easy to setup and use; Management and reporting of tests are very intuitive. The system allows for easy alterations to existing tests and branching.
ConsDoes not work on all browsers and multiple view ports. The price is increasing in May, but it is still very affordable
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018
Avatar Image
Robert W.
Production Assistant
Unspecified
Used the software for: 6-12 months
Overall Rating
5/5
Ease of Use
4/5
Customer Service
4/5
Features
4/5
Value for Money
4/5
Likelihood to Recommend
9/10
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
June 8, 2018

“Real-time software for administering automated tests ”

OverallEnables interviews to be conducted accurately and hire the right employees
ProsThere is training that is provided to enable the new user learn more about the product The customer service is excellent
ConsThe user interface needs to be updated and i hope the next versions of the software will accommodate that concern
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
June 8, 2018
Verified Reviewer
Unspecified
Used the software for: Less than 6 months
Overall Rating
4/5
Ease of Use
4/5
Customer Service
5/5
Features
3/5
Value for Money
3/5
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018

“A powerful test tool that is continuing to improve and become increasingly more valuable”

ProsI like that a number of tests start running right away when you add a new app. I like the customer service, they are professional, friendly and helpful
ConsIt is time-consuming to set up the tests and often you must run the journeys over and over to see if they will work or not.
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018
Verified Reviewer
Utilities, 1001-5000 employees
Used the software for: Less than 6 months
Overall Rating
5/5
Ease of Use
5/5
Customer Service
5/5
Features
4/5
Value for Money
5/5
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018

“Set up E2E tests in no time”

ProsBusiness user friendly interface and low barrier of entry. Easy integration into CI process. The monitoring capabilities are detailed and easy to understand.
ConsI'd like to have more options on asserting conditions during a test. Other than that, I have have nothing much to complain.
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018
Matthew D.
Director of QA
Information Technology and Services, 51-200 employees
Used the software for: Less than 6 months
Overall Rating
2/5
Ease of Use
3/5
Customer Service
5/5
Features
1/5
Value for Money
1/5
Likelihood to Recommend
2/10
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 4, 2018

“The product has more bugs than its worth, and it takes longer to perform its tests than one of my te”

OverallI want to be clear, I think that this product is on the right track, and is going to be amazing. this tool will free up the testers from the less effective validation of the product by doing that kind of testing, thus freeing up the tester to actually test and see where things break. Ai is the automation direction that we need to go, and mabl will free up money and people to do the jobs that we are needed to do.
ProsIt is easy to set up use, and get running. Apparently I have to be more wordy in this field, why I dont know.
ConsThe problem is that the tool will log its self out and then pass the remaining tests. The chrome pug-in requires a login but then forces the user to log in again to the website in the same browser, after clicking the button in the plug-in. creating tests that would manipulate the data seem easy, with applying some simple coding skills the user is able to create valuable tests. the problem is that mabl cant find the field, button, or part of the page that was selected in the test creation and simply stop running, no error, nothing. Dont get me wrong I think that this tool is going to be amazing, the problem is that it is simply not there yet.
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 4, 2018
Avatar Image
Vikram V.
Software Development Engineer In Test
Financial Services, 201-500 employees
Used the software for: Unspecified
Overall Rating
3/5
Ease of Use
3/5
Customer Service
5/5
Features
4/5
Value for Money
4/5
Likelihood to Recommend
8/10
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 4, 2018

“mabl has the potential to become valuable partner to tech community”

Overalleasy to record user actions, easy to run in cloud
ProsI tried using mabl for a week and I found it useful in below way - easy to record, playback user scenarios - can do complex user interactions - cloud based execution - built in AI - great customer support from all the members in company
Cons- support for only few browsers - slowness in test execution - customization and scripting of recorded user scenarios - many usability issues
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 4, 2018
Chris S.
CTO
Unspecified
Used the software for: Less than 6 months
Overall Rating
4/5
Ease of Use
4/5
Customer Service
4/5
Features
4/5
Value for Money
4/5
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018

“Still early days”

ProsPricing is on demand and is based on actual usage. This is good as we're a startup and we haven't starting building our product yet.
ConsToo early today.We are still designing product and will have a better opinion once we start building
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018
Nathan W.
Sales Engineer
Computer Software, 201-500 employees
Used the software for: Less than 6 months
Overall Rating
3/5
Ease of Use
5/5
Customer Service
4/5
Features
4/5
Value for Money
5/5
Likelihood to Recommend
8/10
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018

“I found MABL to be a solid ML based testing tool - set up basic test/checks.”

OverallAutomated testing with very little configuration, out of the box validations, lots of depth and customization options.
ProsThe automatic execution is nice - not having to set up triggers and timers manually is appreciated. The ML aspect is interesting, and hopefully I can dig into this a little more in the near future. I would like to use this for service testing as well as UI based scripts.
ConsNothing so far, all worked well! I would like to dig into the validation rules a little bit more and see what depth of testing is supported, as well as options for custom scripts (import Cucumber script etc.)
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018
Patrick O.
Scrum Master
Unspecified
Used the software for: 6-12 months
Overall Rating
5/5
Ease of Use
5/5
Customer Service
5/5
Features
5/5
Value for Money
5/5
Likelihood to Recommend
10/10
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018

“Really enjoy using MABL”

Prosmabl allows us to automate a lot of our testing saving time and money. The paths are easy to create.
ConsIt can be dificult to manage noisy mabl notifications. It did take some work to get the system to notify only on what is important to team.
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018
Avatar Image
Dono G.
Head of QA
Unspecified
Used the software for: Less than 6 months
Overall Rating
4/5
Ease of Use
5/5
Customer Service
5/5
Features
3/5
Value for Money
4/5
Likelihood to Recommend
7/10
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 4, 2018

“Really promising product that will surely be a gold standard tool in the future”

OverallNot too many at the moment, but that is largely due to the organisation I work for. A few more features and this would be a crucial tool in my QA team's armoury.
ProsThe automated nature of it. This takes away the very expensive part of maintaining a UI automation suite. Intuitive UI that is easy to understand with minimal instruction.
ConsThere are still a few gaps in functionality. Does Not work with all websites, especially older GUI's Can only train in Chrome along with only supporting Chrome and Firefox for now
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 4, 2018
Saranya S.
Manager
Computer Software, 10,001+ employees
Used the software for: Unspecified
Overall Rating
4/5
Ease of Use
5/5
Customer Service
5/5
Features
3/5
Value for Money
4/5
Likelihood to Recommend
7/10
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 9, 2018

“Mabl is pretty good tool for automation testers. Auto Heal is an awesome functionality. ”

OverallEase of use.
ProsAuto Heal API Call to trigger execution Journey creation - simple and easy Test Execution triggers Broken link validation
ConsTool could have provisions to create user specific actions. There is no support to have the scripts pushed to version control System
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 9, 2018
Verified Reviewer
51-200 employees
Used the software for: Unspecified
Overall Rating
4/5
Ease of Use
4/5
Customer Service
5/5
Features
4/5
Value for Money
4/5
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018

“I like the overall concept , has great scope and will tremendously reduce human effort for testing.”

ProsThat it can train itself and flow of the product can be taught to it. It is easy to use with minimum specifications for links testing.
ConsIt does not work well for drop downs. It somehow goes through the flow wrongly even when I specificed the steps.
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018
Alexander K.
Lead QA Engineer
Computer Software, 51-200 employees
Used the software for: Unspecified
Overall Rating
4/5
Ease of Use
3/5
Customer Service
4/5
Features
4/5
Value for Money
3/5
Likelihood to Recommend
7/10
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018

“It is very useful to get done the job faster”

ProsThere are many features, I think even not technical person can start creating testing project. There is also room to grow.
ConsThere workflow was not obvious for the first time user. Need some time and efforts to make the test working
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018
Anca O.
QA Manager
Unspecified
Used the software for: Less than 6 months
Overall Rating
4/5
Ease of Use
4/5
Customer Service
5/5
Features
4/5
Value for Money
4/5
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 4, 2018

“Promising tool, I'm glad I found it.”

ProsEasy to setup and to record tests, friendly UI, easy to learn by non-technical members, provides reports, integrates with Jenkins, no coding skills needed
Cons"Find element" feature could be improved, I'd like to be able to run tests sequentially when I add multiple journeys to a plan, I'd like to be able to edit a step more easily (without playing and stopping to the step, or having to remove others)
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 4, 2018
melissa p.
QA engineer
Unspecified
Used the software for: Unspecified
Overall Rating
5/5
Ease of Use
5/5
Customer Service
5/5
Features
5/5
Value for Money
5/5
Likelihood to Recommend
10/10
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018

“I wish our office used mabl. It is a great tool for QA!”

ProsI love the configurability and reuse possibilities. So many possibilities to improve efficiency and productivity for QA. it's a great product!
Consmy office doesn't have it, unfortunately! I really wish I could get a solo license but we have to get it approved.
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018
Matthew S.
Test Automation Specialist
Information Technology and Services, 51-200 employees
Used the software for: Less than 6 months
Overall Rating
4/5
Ease of Use
4/5
Customer Service
5/5
Features
4/5
Value for Money
5/5
Likelihood to Recommend
9/10
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018

“An innovative product with a the right direction”

ProsIt's intutive, easy to implement and affordable. In comparison to competitors, I love the auto-healing feature that solves simple regression changes.
ConsOccasionally, the UI for building a journey can be clunky which has resulted in having to recreate an entire journey - especially not being able to edit a journey from a certain point or step backwards. Implentation of 'flows' has eased this process.
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018
Avatar Image
Heather R.
Product Analysis Manager
51-200 employees
Used the software for: Less than 6 months
Overall Rating
4/5
Ease of Use
4/5
Customer Service
5/5
Features
4/5
Value for Money
4/5
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 4, 2018

“Mabl gives us insights on our clients' websites. Very helpful!”

ProsI like that mabl can adapt to changes in content, both letting me know "Hey - this part of the page has changed" and "But I think I adjusted your test correctly - could you check?"
ConsI'd like more flexibility in scripting tests, in particular, the ability to edit them from the keyboard. But I know she's in early days, and there's a roadmap.
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 4, 2018
Linkesh C.
Senior QA Engineer
Computer Software, 51-200 employees
Used the software for: Less than 6 months
Overall Rating
3/5
Ease of Use
4/5
Features
5/5
Value for Money
3/5
Likelihood to Recommend
7/10
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 4, 2018

“Overall experience is Good. ”

OverallKnowledge and understanding basics of machine learning technology.
ProsIt is very easy to learn and use. It covers most of the requirement of Quality Assurance team. And Very nice report generation structure.
ConsTest Execution Time is more and painful, Comparing to selenium or cucumber scripts execution. Training Videos on how to use all the features should have added more value
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 4, 2018
Verified Reviewer
Computer Software, 51-200 employees
Used the software for: Less than 6 months
Overall Rating
3/5
Ease of Use
2/5
Customer Service
5/5
Features
3/5
Value for Money
2/5
Likelihood to Recommend
5/10
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018

“good starting point for UI automation but record and playback does not work correctly”

OverallAI automation is a thing now but its far from useful
ProsI like the naming convention of the journey etc. I like the actual step by step activities. the broken links are helpful.
Consfor UI automation purposes it does not record correctly. Replay on first try does not work. Do not know how to fix the replay when it is broken, No easy way to fix the broken test.
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018
sumit m.
QA Manager
Unspecified
Used the software for: Less than 6 months
Overall Rating
3/5
Ease of Use
2/5
Customer Service
4/5
Features
2/5
Value for Money
3/5
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018

“Started well but became fickle as complexity increased. Not much AI on assertions. ”

ProsEasy setup. User simulation. CI integration. Some auto validations. Customizable journey. Easy to include at UI web development stage
ConsComplex assertions setup. Not enough beyond dom. Hard to capture html containers without don. Integration of rest and UI. Reporting not customizable
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018
George N.
Enterprise Architect
Farming, 1001-5000 employees
Used the software for: Less than 6 months
Overall Rating
4/5
Ease of Use
3/5
Customer Service
3/5
Features
2/5
Value for Money
3/5
Likelihood to Recommend
6/10
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018

“Simple, Easy and Futuristic”

ProsUI testing is tedious, the ability to use AI to learn and develop different scenarios based on the user journey is AMAZING
ConsSince AI is still in its infancy with regards to automated testing, it might take more time for QA developers to build trust and embrace the product.
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018
Nemanja V.
UI/UX designer
Unspecified
Used the software for: Less than 6 months
Overall Rating
5/5
Ease of Use
5/5
Customer Service
5/5
Features
5/5
Value for Money
5/5
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018

“Great tool for developers!”

ProsSimplicity and easy to work with. The UI for mable is just great. I had no problems to setup any of the journeys and testing works just perfect. This is a must-have tool for every developer.
ConsSo far so nothing. A interface could be something to be worked on, but that's not important at this stage
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018
Avatar Image
Tobias M.
Co-Founder & CTO
Apparel & Fashion, Unspecified
Used the software for: Less than 6 months
Overall Rating
4/5
Ease of Use
4/5
Customer Service
5/5
Features
5/5
Value for Money
5/5
Likelihood to Recommend
9/10
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 5, 2018

“Great tool to run tests on-demand or scheduled”

Pros- Fresh, new concept - Interesting approach on integrating machine learning - Competitive price - Fantastic customer service
Cons- User interface need some improvements to get your way around - Still early stage so some bugs may appear but still a great piece of software
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 5, 2018
Dhruv M.
QE Manager
Computer Software, 51-200 employees
Used the software for: Less than 6 months
Overall Rating
3/5
Ease of Use
3/5
Customer Service
3/5
Features
3/5
Value for Money
3/5
Likelihood to Recommend
5/10
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018

“Initial experience with Mabl has been mixed: executing recorded tests is not as smooth as I hoped.”

OverallNone yet, until I am fully able to record and execute tests.
ProsThe potential to automate tests quickly and have them self-heal, using machine learning, is intriguing.
ConsThe software has been quite buggy. Re-using scenarios, recording login steps, and interacting with certain UI elements (such as sliders) has been difficult.
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018
David L.
QA Automation Engineer
Unspecified
Used the software for: Less than 6 months
Overall Rating
5/5
Ease of Use
4/5
Customer Service
5/5
Features
4/5
Value for Money
4/5
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018

“Simple and easy to use”

ProsThe UI was straight forward and ready to understand. Overall the instructions provided great use cases and were easy to set up.
ConsLimitations when it came to testing production and development environments. The emails became a bit spamming and weren't useful.
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018
Linda H.
Acting QA Manager
Unspecified
Used the software for: Less than 6 months
Overall Rating
4/5
Ease of Use
3/5
Customer Service
5/5
Features
3/5
Value for Money
4/5
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 4, 2018

“Super nice company, quick feedback/support and fast delivery of new requested features”

ProsThat we can use it for our tests in an easy way. It's easy to start with and it's dosen't require any licenses or other software.
ConsIt doesn't has all the feature we need yet :) Sometimes is not so straight forward to know how to do the things we like to do.
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 4, 2018
Avatar Image
Uri K.
VP Engineering
Financial Services, 51-200 employees
Used the software for: Unspecified
Overall Rating
1/5
Ease of Use
1/5
Features
1/5
Likelihood to Recommend
0/10
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018

“Could not get it to work”

OverallNone
ProsWhat it tries to accomplish is wonderful, and the ease of use could potentially save my QA team a lot of time.
ConsFirst it broke when I tried to edit a journey (500 message). Then it worked but moving steps around was impossible and it never added new steps in the right place. Finally, I ran a test and it could not find the field in my webpage.
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018
Verified Reviewer
51-200 employees
Used the software for: Less than 6 months
Overall Rating
4/5
Ease of Use
4/5
Customer Service
5/5
Features
5/5
Value for Money
5/5
Likelihood to Recommend
9/10
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018

“I tested Mabl for an hour and used it a few other times after. It has great potential.”

OverallAutomated testing, daily emails reflecting status of tests, ease of use
ProsThe potential of the software is the most exciting part. You can see that the product will make things easier for customers. The look and feel of Mabl seemed pretty modern which is important because it makes it seem like it has great support.
ConsThere were a few bugs around the product, but I suspect those will be taken care of. Other than that, it was somewhat difficult to work my way around using the product for the first time. This was resolved as the process was explained to me, but it could be easier to understand.
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018
eran K.
Director and evangelist
Unspecified
Used the software for: Less than 6 months
Overall Rating
5/5
Ease of Use
5/5
Customer Service
5/5
Features
3/5
Value for Money
3/5
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018

“Great emerging product for automated web testing”

ProsEasy to start with, extensive test data automatically generated and re-executed daily or upon schedule
ConsOnly web and not mobile support is the most important gap to close Immediate support for latest Os platforms is also a question
Reviewer Source 
Source: Capterra
May 3, 2018