Stack Overflow

Stack Overflow for Teams


4.5 / 5
32 reviews

Who Uses This Software?

Any team looking to capture tribal knowledge, share and find information better, and onboard new team members faster.


Average Ratings

32 Reviews

  • 4.5 / 5
    Overall

  • 4.5 / 5
    Ease of Use

  • 4.5 / 5
    Customer Service

Product Details

  • Starting Price
    $10.00/month
  • Pricing Details
    $10/mo for first 10 users. Additional users are $5/mo billed annually.
  • Deployment
    Cloud, SaaS, Web
  • Training
    Documentation
  • Support
    Business Hours

Vendor Details

  • Stack Overflow
  • stackoverflow.com
  • Founded 2008
  • United States

About Stack Overflow for Teams

Stack Overflow for Teams is a private, secure Q&A platform that mimics the way people naturally think about, share, and find information. When it comes to knowledge management, you dont need more information, you need the right information. Stack Overflows Q&A format makes it easy to quickly find and share bite-sized information without having to dig through stale wikis and lost emails. Start a free 14-day trial today and give your team back the time it needs to keep moving forward. For teams


Stack Overflow for Teams Features

  • Cataloging / Categorization
  • Collaboration
  • Content Management
  • Data Management
  • Discussion Boards
  • Document Management
  • FAQ
  • Full Text Search
  • Guided Problem Solving
  • Self Service Portal
  • Self-Learning

Stack Overflow for Teams Reviews Recently Reviewed!


Almost Perfect

Nov 07, 2018
4/5
Overall

3 / 5
Ease of Use

4 / 5
Features & Functionality

5 / 5
Customer Support

5 / 5
Value for Money
Likelihood to Recommend: 10.0/10 Not
Likely
Extremely
Likely

Pros: First, let me be clear that it's not clear to me if this is about Stack Overflow or about Stack Overflow for Teams, the latter of which is what brought me to this survey. The survey here in particular says to write a review for "Stack Overflow" (not for Teams), so I'll say this: Somewhere on Stack Overflow is nearly every part of every program I've ever written. It's an absolutely indispensable resource for every programmer.

Cons: I'm a Stack Overflow user and a Stack Exchange moderator. The most frustrating aspect of the site(s) is that the original asker is the only one that gets to pick the correct answer. OP's choice of answers gets pushed to the top regardless of community votes, and the question will be continuously bumped to the front page if the OP never picks an answer. I wish there were something like a "community accepted" answer, or a "de facto best answer" in the events where a question has been open for X days and has an answer with a score of Y but no accepted answers, or in the event where the top scored answer exceeds the score of the accepted answer by some magic ratio.

Overall: I can kind of get with the idea that we're not supposed to post resources to Stack Overflow, but then I kind of also wish that there were some kind of a "curated" Stack Overflow, where it would be possible for "knowledgeable persons" (by reputation I'm sure) to accumulate "classic" questions and answers in a set of community references, especially such that you could see and easily browse related questions. I'm realizing now that this doesn't exactly address the "overall experience" I've had with SO, but I guess my point is that it can be kind of a pain to find quality related questions when I'm trying to find answers. Google results seem to be the way to go (because tags are generally far too superficial to be of much use), but then Google seems to optimize based on "famous" questions and really new questions, and I find the Google results keep regurgitating the same half-dozen or so questions (some results link the question, some results link the best answer, some results link the accepted answer, etc.). I've got more to say about this, but I feel like I'm digressing, so I'll just leave this comment as-is.

Vendor Response

by Stack Overflow on December 11, 2018

Thanks for sharing your feedback about Teams, Charles! Our user research team would love to know more about how you think we can improve the product. Feel free to reach out to beth@stackoverflow.com and share your thoughts!

Capterra loader

Teams is a private

Dec 05, 2018
5/5
Overall

5 / 5
Ease of Use

4 / 5
Features & Functionality

5 / 5
Customer Support

5 / 5
Value for Money
Likelihood to Recommend: 10.0/10 Not
Likely
Extremely
Likely

Pros: I really like how Stack Exchange took the highly successful Q&A format of Stack Overflow and brought it to teams via Stack Overflow Teams. It works well for our company because everyone is already familiar with finding the answers to their questions on Stack Overflow and many of our employees are contributors (as answerers) as well. It has encouraged our employees to contribute high-quality questions and answers to help others with similar questions in the future. The long format also encourage answers with rich content such as images and external links.

Cons: Stack Overflow Teams is still undergoing active development. For example, Slack integration (a way to encourage internal adoption) was a little slow to arrive (but it's here now!). During this development period, you just have to be patient. Thankfully, Stack Exchange has a great team that values their users' feedback so the awaited features they ship will definitely meet your needs and if they don't, they want to hear about it.

Overall: Our experience has been extremely positive. We have seen quick adoption and everyone appreciates the answers and questions that we are currently using it for. It has turned into our primary internal knowledge base. I am also very satisfied with their outreach to active users during the development of new features.

Vendor Response

by Stack Overflow on December 10, 2018

Thanks for sharing your experience using Teams! Glad to hear that you've had a positive experience so far. If you have any feedback you'd like to share about the features or integrations of Teams, you can email: bdevine@stackoverflow.com.

4* - useful as a knowledge base

Nov 07, 2018
4/5
Overall

4 / 5
Ease of Use

4 / 5
Features & Functionality

5 / 5
Customer Support
Likelihood to Recommend: 8.0/10 Not
Likely
Extremely
Likely

Pros: Teams follows the same Q&A pattern used on Stack Overflow itself, which many developers will already be familiar with. The Q&A pattern also makes it an excellent tool for knowledge bases, which is how my team uses it - instead of writing The One True Help Article for each KB topic, asking a question for it allows the whole team to collaborate in sharing the nuances they've picked up but wouldn't otherwise have an easy way to share.

Cons: Teams doesn't come with the same moderation tools that Stack Overflow itself does. While that's probably not a problem for companies (rule infractions or misconduct can be handled through HR's disciplinary procedures), it may make it not as suited to less formal teams such as those maintaining open-source projects. These projects often require more moderation than a company's use-case would do, which Teams lacks proper support for.

Overall: My team maintains an open-source project that revolves around Stack Overflow and the Stack Exchange network. We use Teams primarily as a knowledge base and support hub, which has allowed us to move away from using GitHub issues and wikis for these purposes to a much more appropriate format. Teams also has the benefit for us of being directly integrated into Stack Overflow, where we're all already working, so all our content is right there when it's needed.

Vendor Response

by Stack Overflow on December 10, 2018

Thanks for sharing your feedback, Owen! We definitely hear your concern about moderation tools, and will keep that in mind as we continue to develop the product.

Your own personal Stack Overflow

Nov 07, 2018
4/5
Overall

5 / 5
Ease of Use

4 / 5
Features & Functionality
Likelihood to Recommend: 8.0/10 Not
Likely
Extremely
Likely

Pros: If you're part of the tech world, you've almost certainly come across Stack Overflow. I use the site on a regular basis and was thrilled to find that they were creating a version that I could use for my own purposes. The UI is intuitive and easy to use and when coupled with the quality/voting system, this becomes a powerful tool for storing all of your key business information in a single place. Questions which are asked over and over again will be a thing of the past. It also features some useful moderation tools to ensure that your Team stays on track. Various different notification options also let you tailor what you hear about and how whilst integrating seamlessly into Stack Overflow.

Cons: It is missing a few of the useful features for managing content quality that Stack Overflow has. The flagging controls and reviewing are missed.

Overall: Especially in development teams, there's a lot of information silos - this software helps to break down these barriers and have a single place for all of the documentation relating to your product.

Vendor Response

by Stack Overflow on December 11, 2018

Thanks for sharing your experience using Stack Overflow for Teams! We'd love to know more about the useful features you think it's missing. Feel free to email our user research team at beth@stackoverflow.com and share your thoughts!

Capterra loader

A informatational, but cluttered place for code.

Nov 07, 2018
4/5
Overall

3 / 5
Ease of Use

4 / 5
Features & Functionality
Likelihood to Recommend: 7.0/10 Not
Likely
Extremely
Likely

Pros: The amount of information available in regards to programming issues is very nice.

This helps a ton in development, and helps preventing having to reinvent the wheel all the time.

The indepth-ness of said information is usually quite high, allowing for people to easier understand future/similar problems from that point on wards.

Cons: The elitist feel it often gives, which makes it fairly hard to get into the product.

However, once you reach a point of understand why, the point of the product has also reached you.

Overall: Stackoverflow is our go-to issue resolving tool in regards to bugs and not knowing how to do things in code. And more often the only source of good information in regards to specific bugs. Even though quite a bit of the entries are dated.

Vendor Response

by Stack Overflow on December 11, 2018

Thanks for sharing your feedback with us, Dimitri! Our team is actively working to make the product feel more inclusive and easier to use for new Stack Overflow users.

I love Stack Overflow

Nov 07, 2018
4/5
Overall

5 / 5
Ease of Use

5 / 5
Features & Functionality

3 / 5
Customer Support

3 / 5
Value for Money
Likelihood to Recommend: 7.0/10 Not
Likely
Extremely
Likely

Pros: Getting answers to all my programming questions, having a place I can go where I know there are already answers.

Cons: I don't like it when there are unanswered questions to my problem that have seen almost no work done on them. I can't re-ask the question and the chances that the person asking the question in the first place has moved on

Overall: Very good, it has helped me become a better programmer and a professional one.

Vendor Response

by Stack Overflow on December 10, 2018

Glad to hear you've had such a great experience with Stack Overflow for Teams, Peter!

Familiar collaboration with a few too many hurdles

Feb 03, 2019
5/5
Overall

4 / 5
Ease of Use

4 / 5
Features & Functionality

5 / 5
Customer Support

3 / 5
Value for Money
Likelihood to Recommend: 8.0/10 Not
Likely
Extremely
Likely

Pros: Stack Overflow for Teams takes the existing Stack Overflow collaborative question and answer format and extends it to private development teams. The result is a private forum of your most asked and most needed questions, a living and breathing repository of tribal knowledge...as long as the team uses it. If you've used Stack Overflow, the features and management are identical to the public version.

Cons: The interface has not changed much to enable Teams, but that comes at a bit of a burden for administration. Features are not as isolated or intuitive as they could be, making it hard to separate personal and private Stack Overflow. Pricing is also at the high end for basic collaboration, although cheaper than alternatives like Confluence. Adoption is also a consideration. Stack Overflow for Teams faces the same adoption issues as all other collaboration tools, but does not offer much to drive users back into the tool.

Say bye to repetitive questions by your colleagues

Dec 06, 2018
5/5
Overall

5 / 5
Ease of Use

5 / 5
Features & Functionality

5 / 5
Customer Support

5 / 5
Value for Money
Likelihood to Recommend: 9.0/10 Not
Likely
Extremely
Likely

Pros: * The slack integration is wonderful

* Having your workplaces knowledge hub built into your stackoverflow account; which you already log in to on a daily basis, is awesome.

* Having repetitive questions asked there and answered once, in return increasing my productivity and time is incredible.

Cons: I would definitely like to see a way to have a bit more integration to slack or other products.

Vendor Response

by Stack Overflow on December 10, 2018

Great to see that you're using the Slack integration, Julian! Are there any specific integrations you'd like to see in particular?

It's Gold. Radio Gold

Nov 07, 2018
5/5
Overall

5 / 5
Ease of Use

5 / 5
Features & Functionality

5 / 5
Customer Support

5 / 5
Value for Money
Likelihood to Recommend: 10.0/10 Not
Likely
Extremely
Likely

Pros: It lets me share the knowledge I have with people that want it.

Cons: Nothing. Stack Overflow is just overall wonderful.

Vendor Response

by Stack Overflow on December 10, 2018

Thanks for sharing your experience using Teams, Caleb!

Capterra loader

Good Resource; Product finding its way

Nov 07, 2018
5/5
Overall

3 / 5
Ease of Use

3 / 5
Features & Functionality

5 / 5
Customer Support

3 / 5
Value for Money
Likelihood to Recommend: 8.0/10 Not
Likely
Extremely
Likely

Pros: Stack Overflow has solved many previous hard problems

- Finding relevant content

- Making authorship of Q & A easy and targetted

Cons: - It still feels like a bolt-on to the Q & A.

- It presupposes that useful documentation takes the form of Q & A

- In an enterprise; I can't add 'yet another' way to document things. We have five currently; and I can't get Q & A to be 6 (Google Site Wiki; Google Docs; Gitlab Wikis; Gitlab git repos; JIRA)

Overall: I love Stack Overflow and I love their ethic. I continue to hold out hope that if anyone can solve the thorny problem of cataloguing and documenting software development and making it actionable to stakeholders; they can.

Vendor Response

by Stack Overflow on December 10, 2018

Thanks for sharing your feedback, George! We're actively working on ways to integration Stack Overflow for Teams into your existing workflows with other tools - our hope it that eventually it will replace things like wikis and outdated documentation.

Capterra loader

Great Tool for our Software Development Team

Dec 12, 2018
5/5
Overall

5 / 5
Ease of Use

5 / 5
Features & Functionality

5 / 5
Customer Support

5 / 5
Value for Money
Likelihood to Recommend: 10.0/10 Not
Likely
Extremely
Likely

Pros: Our Developers love the Stack Overflow tool(s). Frequently, we will go to Stack Overflow to pose a development question or seek guidance on how to proceed on our code base. The user community is wonderful and very helpful.

Cons: We have nothing negative to state about this software.

Overall: Our team has benefitted greatly from this tool. Our code is open source which helps us when we are seeking a better way to create enhancements in our application. The User community is very helpful and always provides great ideas for us to consider.

Bringing benefits of focused Q&A to my team without losing confidentiality

Nov 06, 2018
5/5
Overall

5 / 5
Ease of Use

5 / 5
Features & Functionality
Likelihood to Recommend: 10.0/10 Not
Likely
Extremely
Likely

Pros: Stack Overflow for Teams sits seamlessly alongside the main Stack Overflow and other Stack Exchange sites to let me get the dual benefits of public Q&A with the rest of the world and confidential Q&A with my team.

Cons: The only thing that I can say against Stack Overflow for Teams is that I wish I had access to it sooner.

Vendor Response

by Stack Overflow on December 11, 2018

Glad to hear that you are seeing success with Stack Overflow for Teams!

Capterra loader

A great tool that could use a bit more moderation

Nov 07, 2018
4/5
Overall

5 / 5
Ease of Use

4 / 5
Features & Functionality
Likelihood to Recommend: 9.0/10 Not
Likely
Extremely
Likely

Pros: - Q/A and vote system that I know and love from the main site

- Accessibility (no extra login) and easy to use

- Integration into the SE network with notifications and rep

Cons: Missing flexibility:

- You only have 3k-ish privileges (vote to close), but only as dupes, no other or custom close reasons are possible.

- No powers to delete and see deleted posts.

- Switching from the main site to the team or vice-versa is sometimea a bit finicky.

Overall: SO for teams is a good product and could be ever better with some tweaks.

Vendor Response

by Stack Overflow on December 11, 2018

Thanks for sharing your feedback, Philipp! Our team would love to know more about the features you think the product is missing. Feel free to reach out to beth@stackoverflow.com and share your thoughts with our user research team!

Stack Overflow Review

Nov 07, 2018
5/5
Overall

4 / 5
Ease of Use

5 / 5
Features & Functionality

5 / 5
Customer Support
Likelihood to Recommend: 10.0/10 Not
Likely
Extremely
Likely

Pros: - I like the confidential's way it's.

- I like how the dynamic is change as when the team is small, and more personal, it bring the communication at another level.

Cons: - The team I'm on is linked to SO, I dont know if special URL exist to just see the teams link, and not everything else.

Overall: I have at my job a official slack's channel, and often it has way too much background noise to understand something in there, Team is a better way to communicate between team mate in a controlled's way.

Vendor Response

by Stack Overflow on December 10, 2018

Glad to hear you're enjoying using Stack Overflow for Teams! If you're looking for a Team that's not linked to stackoverflow.com, you may want to check out our Enterprise offering which allows you to choose where you host your Team: https://stackoverflow.com/enterprise.

An extension of stackexchange for your teams

Nov 07, 2018
4/5
Overall

5 / 5
Ease of Use

5 / 5
Features & Functionality
Likelihood to Recommend: 7.0/10 Not
Likely
Extremely
Likely

Pros: This is a nice private area where you can post your thoughts and request feedback from your colleagues about your organization. The Q&A format works extremely well for a lot of things, and continues to be a strong point for teams. Keeping things, quick concise and to the point

Cons: A few minor annoyances: The moderation symbol uses an emoji that isn't compatible with Windows 7, and just shows as a square.

The reputation system doesn't seem to work very well here. It's still early yet, but it seems like I see a lot of test pages that people upvote in order to get reputation points. With almost everything locked at 1 vote, I'm not sure the reputation system works very well here.

Overall: Overall, it was nice and convenient. I applied to a team, and got into it with relatively little ease (Mostly because I'm already extremely well knowledged on the system from stackoverflow).

Vendor Response

by Stack Overflow on December 10, 2018

Thanks for sharing your experience using Stack Overflow for Teams, Daniel! We'll definitely pass along your feedback to our product team.

Great product

Nov 06, 2018
5/5
Overall

4 / 5
Ease of Use

4 / 5
Features & Functionality
Likelihood to Recommend: 8.0/10 Not
Likely
Extremely
Likely

Pros: Stack Overflow Teams has a similar interface to the main Stack Overflow site making easy for our team who were already avid users to be productive with the system. It's a great place for keeping a private Q/A in a structured format.

Cons: While not a problem for our small team some expanded moderation tools may be useful for larger teams to remove problem posts etc.

Vendor Response

by Stack Overflow on December 11, 2018

Thanks for sharing your feedback, Peter! We'd love to know more about the types of moderation tools you're thinking about. Feel free to reach out to our user research team at beth@stackoverflow.com and share your thoughts!

Excellent Resource

Nov 07, 2018
5/5
Overall

5 / 5
Ease of Use

5 / 5
Features & Functionality

5 / 5
Customer Support

5 / 5
Value for Money
Likelihood to Recommend: 9.0/10 Not
Likely
Extremely
Likely

Pros: It is very easy to detail what you need help with, it allows you to alert specific team members so you know you can get help from people who likely know best to help you. The voting and such helps you make sure you're getting reliable information.

Cons: It can be a little bit difficult to use at first, if you're not already familiar with how things work. But once you figure out the tagging and such, it gets easier.

Vendor Response

by Stack Overflow on December 10, 2018

Thanks for sharing your feedback! We're actively working on making the Teams easier to use for developers who may not know how to use Stack Overflow.

A tool we all use, now for your team

Dec 17, 2018
5/5
Overall

5 / 5
Ease of Use

5 / 5
Features & Functionality

5 / 5
Customer Support

5 / 5
Value for Money
Likelihood to Recommend: 10.0/10 Not
Likely
Extremely
Likely

Pros: This takes a format developers are very familiar with and allows you to use it for your own team and documentation. This is the best way to create living documentation that I have ever seen before. I am so excited to continue using this as my team and company grows so our documentation can grow with us. It will also be a key tool for onboarding.

Cons: That it is a bit hard to remind people on the team to use it. However, as time goes on I am sure integrations like Asana will come along.

Capterra loader

Perfect for large distributed teams

Nov 08, 2018
5/5
Overall

5 / 5
Ease of Use

4 / 5
Features & Functionality
Likelihood to Recommend: 10.0/10 Not
Likely
Extremely
Likely

Pros: Ease of use, and speed. It allows large or distributed members to work together

Cons: The cost is too high for me to consider it for my non profit organization

Vendor Response

by Stack Overflow on December 10, 2018

Great to hear that Stack Overflow for Teams is working well for you, Luke! We actually offer non-profit pricing - if you go to this page, scroll to the bottom, and fill out the form, you will be eligible! https://stackoverflow.com/pricing

Capterra loader

Platform for knowledge sharing

Dec 05, 2018
5/5
Overall

5 / 5
Ease of Use

5 / 5
Features & Functionality

5 / 5
Customer Support

3 / 5
Value for Money
Likelihood to Recommend: 8.0/10 Not
Likely
Extremely
Likely

Pros: It's quite easy to share an existing team knowledge with the new members of team with this product. On the other hand, Slack integration is great.

Cons: Price. I think this product might be a bit pricey for some teams. It could be better if they provide some discount for non-profits and educational institutions.

Vendor Response

by Stack Overflow on December 10, 2018

Thanks for your feedback! We actually offer non-profit pricing - if you scroll to the bottom of this page, you'll be able to submit a form to request pricing for your non-profit: https://stackoverflow.com/pricing.

Like Wiki but better

Dec 06, 2018
5/5
Overall

5 / 5
Ease of Use

5 / 5
Features & Functionality

5 / 5
Value for Money
Likelihood to Recommend: 9.0/10 Not
Likely
Extremely
Likely

Pros: Most engineers don't like to write documentation, but on the other hand, most engineers like to feel like experts, and would gladly give you a piece of advise. These are probably the two strongest reasons to use SO for teams in your company: you can write technical questions and direct them to specific people, they get reputation for their answers and now we have a searchable "wiki" for future users. win-win!

Cons: In small teams it's easier to ask the person that sits next to you instead of posting a question

Overall: We're using it only for 2-3 weeks so it's still a bit early, but so far so good: me and a couple of other colleagues got answers to our questions :)

Vendor Response

by Stack Overflow on December 10, 2018

Thanks for sharing your experience using Stack Overflow for Teams so far, Nir! Great to see that the product is already having a positive impact on your organization in the first couple of weeks.

The best, most familiar Q&A setup, specific for your needs

Nov 07, 2018
5/5
Overall

5 / 5
Ease of Use

3 / 5
Features & Functionality

5 / 5
Customer Support

4 / 5
Value for Money
Likelihood to Recommend: 10.0/10 Not
Likely
Extremely
Likely

Pros: By coming from the great basis of Stack Overflow, it's familiar to use and has a great interface for writing content. People can instantly start writing content, whether that be self-answered Q&A 'knowledge base'-style, or asking for the expertise of someone else. The core Q&A experience is perfectly executed.

Cons: There is virtually zero customisability for the individual team, no way to add custom functionality, custom sidebar content or even styling. It can't be adapted to fit with existing internal sites - it remains distant and associated too heavily with the main public Stack Overflow. Markdown support is lacking tables and other GitHub-flavoured adaptions.

Vendor Response

by Stack Overflow on December 10, 2018

Thanks for your feedback! Our team is working on more customizable features in the near future - stay tuned!

Great Product, with a Great Future!

Dec 06, 2018
5/5
Overall

4 / 5
Ease of Use

5 / 5
Features & Functionality
Likelihood to Recommend: 8.0/10 Not
Likely
Extremely
Likely

Pros: I really like how the search finds both "Teams" and regular SO answers and shows you them on the same page with clear separation

Cons: Some theme colors might make the above-mentioned separation less clear

Vendor Response

by Stack Overflow on December 10, 2018

Thanks for your feedback! Our team is actively working to make the distinction between Stack Overflow for Teams and public Stack Overflow more clear. Stay turned for updates soon!

Stack Overflow for Teams is a great way to collaborate internally for complex products

Feb 12, 2019
4/5
Overall

5 / 5
Ease of Use

5 / 5
Features & Functionality

4 / 5
Customer Support

5 / 5
Value for Money
Likelihood to Recommend: 9.0/10 Not
Likely
Extremely
Likely

Pros: Stack Overflow the application itself is an amazing and necessary product in this day and age where there are so many technical questions being asked online. They gave us the ability to collate and organize that data in one place. They took it one step further by extending their product to work for internal and very specific use. The way a technical team can approach the difficult and detailed aspects of a product with Teams is fantastic.

Cons: I wish there was a bit of an easier way to onboard users who aren't already familiar with Stack Overflow.

Overall: Stack Overflow for Teams allows us to collaborate in a way we weren't previously able to. It also gives us the ability to motivate and track contribution to the company as a whole.

Capterra loader

Brilliant if you already know how to use Stack Overflow

Dec 06, 2018
5/5
Overall

5 / 5
Ease of Use

4 / 5
Features & Functionality

5 / 5
Customer Support
Likelihood to Recommend: 8.0/10 Not
Likely
Extremely
Likely

Pros: If you know how to use Stack Overflow, you'll know how to use Stack Overflow for Teams. It is the perfect mix between having your own private Q'n'A site without having to create one yourself and having a huge amount of extra tools and public knowledge if your problem is not product or IP protected.

Cons: Could use with some more integrations into outside products but believe they're in the works.

Vendor Response

by Stack Overflow on December 10, 2018

Thanks for your feedback Rhys! Glad to hear that you're enjoying using the product. More integrations into outside products are definitely on the roadmap, in fact we just released an integration with Slack. Check it out and let us know what you think!

The best Q&A tool + private = A great tool for knowledge base

Dec 16, 2018
5/5
Overall

5 / 5
Ease of Use

5 / 5
Features & Functionality
Likelihood to Recommend: 8.0/10 Not
Likely
Extremely
Likely

Pros: 1. You can tag a team member so he will notify about your question and most likely will answer you.

2. Save time and energy to answer the same question over and over again and helps to build a knowledge base for your company.

3. Integrated with Slack so you can answer, comment, view questions from Slack and the greater part that you can register a tag to a channel so instead of asking on Stackoverflow and post the link in Slack, the integration does this for you.

Cons: At the beginning, when there are only few questions / answers it feels weird to search for information.

Stack Overflow Teams

Nov 07, 2018
4/5
Overall

4 / 5
Ease of Use

3 / 5
Features & Functionality

4 / 5
Customer Support

3 / 5
Value for Money
Likelihood to Recommend: 7.0/10 Not
Likely
Extremely
Likely

Pros: Stack Overflow is a great platform, it's really nice to have a place to share private Q&A.

Cons: It's hard to drive the company to use it, when real-time alternatives like Slack exist.

Overall: We have a ton of knowledge that isn't captured anywhere, and the same questions keep coming up over and over. Stack Overflow for Teams helped, but ultimately wasn't used enough to justify ongoing payment for the service.

Vendor Response

by Stack Overflow on December 10, 2018

Thanks for giving us your feedback, Matthew! We recently added a Slack integration to the product, which makes it easier to integrate Teams into your existing workflow. Check it out here: https://stackoverflow.com/teams/integrations/slack

Overall pretty good, still has room for improvement.

Nov 07, 2018
4/5
Overall

3 / 5
Ease of Use

4 / 5
Features & Functionality
Likelihood to Recommend: 8.0/10 Not
Likely
Extremely
Likely

Pros: Similar to Stack Overflow only privately.

Really great for documenting and keeping track of problems and solutions.

Cons: User interface isn't that great (it's done so because it's easier to make universal changes)

They've also not properly set it up, it's still a bit buggy.

Vendor Response

by Stack Overflow on December 10, 2018

Thanks for sharing your feedback, Welz! We're actively working on making the user interface easier to use. If you'd like to share more in-depth feedback about what you'd like to see, you can email our user research team: beth@stackoverflow.com.

i love stack overflow

Jan 18, 2019
5/5
Overall

4 / 5
Ease of Use

5 / 5
Features & Functionality

4 / 5
Customer Support

5 / 5
Value for Money
Likelihood to Recommend: 9.0/10 Not
Likely
Extremely
Likely

Pros: possibility to meet new contacts

learning new experience

Cons: better defined navigation for iOS apps version

Capterra loader

Teams - natural evolution for StackOverflow

Nov 07, 2018
4/5
Overall

5 / 5
Ease of Use

4 / 5
Features & Functionality
Likelihood to Recommend: 10.0/10 Not
Likely
Extremely
Likely

Pros: Works exactly the same as StackOverflow, and is very well integrated within the rest of the SO experience. Same great quality we're familiar with in SO.

Cons: There is a tiny bit of friction getting used to the different areas, sometimes with different expectations.

Vendor Response

by Stack Overflow on December 11, 2018

Thanks for sharing your feedback about Teams, Avi!

Give it a go!

Dec 05, 2018
5/5
Overall

5 / 5
Ease of Use

5 / 5
Features & Functionality

5 / 5
Customer Support

4 / 5
Value for Money
Likelihood to Recommend: 10.0/10 Not
Likely
Extremely
Likely

Pros: The ease of use, and the UI is very user friendly. It helps reduce the development time by bypassing the common pits nearly every developer will encounter.

Cons: Nothing as such, they can add more functionality and integrate it with more third party softwares.

Overall: It has been really positive!

Capterra loader

Adequate for internal documentation of sorts...

Dec 05, 2018
4/5
Overall

5 / 5
Ease of Use

4 / 5
Features & Functionality
Likelihood to Recommend: 7.0/10 Not
Likely
Extremely
Likely

Pros: It has the familiar SO interface that I am used to.

Cons: Difficult to author longer documentation when required.

Vendor Response

by Stack Overflow on December 10, 2018

Thanks for your feedback Michael! Authoring longer documentation is definitely still possible with Stack Overflow for Teams - it just has to be translated into the Q&A format.