# invideo Pricing 2026 | Capterra > Learn more about invideo pricing plans including starting price, free versions and trials. Source: https://www.capterra.com/p/180680/InVideo/pricing --- # Pricing for invideo [4.5 (409)](https://www.capterra.com/p/180680/InVideo/reviews/) Write a Review! [View Alternatives](https://www.capterra.com/p/180680/InVideo/alternatives/) ## [invideo](https://www.capterra.com/p/180680/InVideo/) has **3** pricing plans - No free trial - Yes, has free version **Credit Card Required:** No **Discount:** By Plan Frequency ### Invideo AI - Plus plan $20 **Pricing Model:** Flat Rate **Payment Frequency:** One Time Invideo AI - Plus plan plan includes: - 80 credits/mo. - Access to all AI workflows - Access to AI video trends - 4 AI avatars & voice clones - 20 GB storage ### Invideo AI - Max plan $100 **Pricing Model:** Flat Rate **Payment Frequency:** Per Month Invideo AI - Max plan plan includes: - 400 credits/mo. - Access to all AI workflows - Access to AI video trends - 16 AI avatars & voice clones - 2x more concurrency than Plus ### Invideo AI - Generative Plan $250 **Pricing Model:** Flat Rate **Payment Frequency:** Per Month Invideo AI - Generative Plan plan includes: - 1000 credits/mo. - Access to all AI workflows - Access to AI video trends - 40 AI avatars & voice clones - 10x more concurrency than Plus ## Popular alternatives to [invideo](https://www.capterra.com/p/180680/InVideo/) Looking to learn more about Video Making software similar to invideo? Check out these popular alternatives that are closest in terms of key features, functionality, and benefits. [Synthesia](https://www.capterra.com/p/198045/Enact/) by Synthesia [4.6 (313)](https://www.capterra.com/p/198045/Enact/reviews/) Starting Price:$29/month [LEARN MORE](https://www.capterra.com/p/198045/Enact/) [CreateStudio](https://www.capterra.com/p/203897/Create-Studio/) by Banzai [4.8 (578)](https://www.capterra.com/p/203897/Create-Studio/reviews/) Starting Price:$27/month [LEARN MORE](https://www.capterra.com/p/203897/Create-Studio/) [Movavi Video Editor Plus](https://www.capterra.com/p/228422/Movavi-Video-Editor-Plus/) by Movavi [4.8 (1134)](https://www.capterra.com/p/228422/Movavi-Video-Editor-Plus/reviews/) Starting Price:$54.95/year [LEARN MORE](https://www.capterra.com/p/228422/Movavi-Video-Editor-Plus/) [Fliki](https://www.capterra.com/p/246351/Fliki/) by Nine Thirty Five [4.7 (345)](https://www.capterra.com/p/246351/Fliki/reviews/) Starting Price:$8/month [LEARN MORE](https://www.capterra.com/p/246351/Fliki/) [Pictory](https://www.capterra.com/p/229347/Pictory/) by Pictory [4.8 (163)](https://www.capterra.com/p/229347/Pictory/reviews/) Starting Price:$25/year [LEARN MORE](https://www.capterra.com/p/229347/Pictory/) [View all alternatives](https://www.capterra.com/p/180680/InVideo/alternatives/) ## What do others say about [invideo](https://www.capterra.com/p/180680/InVideo/) pricing? Pricing RatingN/A Value For Money[4.5(409)](https://www.capterra.com/p/180680/InVideo/reviews/) Pros Cons [Read All 409 Reviews](https://www.capterra.com/p/180680/InVideo/reviews/) Read Full Reviews Below Shawn S. Director Non-Profit Organization Management, 1-10 employees Used the software for: Less than 6 months ** Overall Rating 1.0 ** Ease of Use 1.0 Customer Service 1.0 Features 1.0 Value for Money 1.0 Reviewer Source Source: Capterra April 15, 2026 "Misleading Claims and Unusable Results Despite Additional Costs" **Overall:** We are a small nonprofit organization and purchased InVideo based on its advertised ability to “create videos without limit” and generate complete videos from simple prompts with “no editing needed.” Within the first couple of hours of using the platform—and during our very first video attempt—it became clear that the product does not deliver on these claims. The system did not reliably use our uploaded assets, did not follow the structure we provided, and generated visuals that were completely mismatched to the content. Scenes included incorrect imagery, blank or incorrect color screens, and unanimated elements where animation was expected. The result was not just slightly off—it was entirely unusable. The platform also claims that videos can be created “just like asking a human editor” and that “no editing is needed.” This was not our experience. The output was nowhere close to usable and would have required significant manual editing, defeating the purpose of the tool. Additionally, the “create videos without limit” claim is misleading. Video generation is heavily restricted by a credit system. While attempting to create a single video, we were prompted to purchase additional credits. We spent over $100 more in good faith, expecting this would resolve the issue. Instead, those credits were consumed without producing a usable result. At that point, the only option presented was to purchase even more credits to try again, despite the fact that the underlying issues were clearly not resolved. This creates a situation where users must continue paying simply to attempt basic functionality. InVideo also advertises a 7-day money-back guarantee. However, in practice, this guarantee is effectively unusable. In our case, simply attempting to generate a video—without downloading or exporting any usable content—consumed credits and made us ineligible for a refund. Since the platform did not produce a usable result, there was no meaningful way to evaluate the service without immediately forfeiting refund eligibility. Importantly, customer support acknowledged that the platform “didn’t perform as expected” and specifically referenced issues such as incorrect visuals, mismatched scenes, and difficulty using uploaded assets—all of which we experienced. Despite this acknowledgment, and despite requesting a refund the same day after only a few hours of use, our refund request was denied based solely on policy. This was not a case of extended use or dissatisfaction over time. It was immediately clear that the platform could not deliver what was advertised, yet no refund was offered or considered. In summary: The platform did not deliver on its core advertised functionality The “no limits” claim is constrained by a costly credit system Additional purchases did not resolve fundamental issues The generated output was not usable without extensive editing The 7-day guarantee is effectively voided by attempting to use the product The company acknowledged these issues but still denied a same-day refund We strongly encourage other organizations—especially nonprofits or small teams with limited budgets—to proceed with caution and fully understand the limitations and costs before committing. This was a costly and disappointing experience for our organization. **Pros:** The concept and marketing are very appealing. The idea of being able to quickly create videos from simple prompts using your own content is exactly what we were looking for as a small nonprofit **Cons:** The platform did not function as advertised. It failed to reliably use uploaded assets, generated incorrect and mismatched visuals, and required significant editing despite claiming none would be needed. The credit system made it costly to even attempt basic functionality, as credits were consumed without producing usable results. Even after acknowledging these issues, support denied a same-day refund. Shawn S. Director Non-Profit Organization Management, 1-10 employees Used the software for: Less than 6 months ** Overall Rating 1.0 ** Ease of Use 1.0 Customer Service 1.0 Features 1.0 Value for Money 1.0 Reviewer Source Source: Capterra April 15, 2026 "Misleading Claims and Unusable Results Despite Additional Costs" **Overall:** We are a small nonprofit organization and purchased InVideo based on its advertised ability to “create videos without limit” and generate complete videos from simple prompts with “no editing needed.” Within the first couple of hours of using the platform—and during our very first video attempt—it became clear that the product does not deliver on these claims. The system did not reliably use our uploaded assets, did not follow the structure we provided, and generated visuals that were completely mismatched to the content. Scenes included incorrect imagery, blank or incorrect color screens, and unanimated elements where animation was expected. The result was not just slightly off—it was entirely unusable. The platform also claims that videos can be created “just like asking a human editor” and that “no editing is needed.” This was not our experience. The output was nowhere close to usable and would have required significant manual editing, defeating the purpose of the tool. Additionally, the “create videos without limit” claim is misleading. Video generation is heavily restricted by a credit system. While attempting to create a single video, we were prompted to purchase additional credits. We spent over $100 more in good faith, expecting this would resolve the issue. Instead, those credits were consumed without producing a usable result. At that point, the only option presented was to purchase even more credits to try again, despite the fact that the underlying issues were clearly not resolved. This creates a situation where users must continue paying simply to attempt basic functionality. InVideo also advertises a 7-day money-back guarantee. However, in practice, this guarantee is effectively unusable. In our case, simply attempting to generate a video—without downloading or exporting any usable content—consumed credits and made us ineligible for a refund. Since the platform did not produce a usable result, there was no meaningful way to evaluate the service without immediately forfeiting refund eligibility. Importantly, customer support acknowledged that the platform “didn’t perform as expected” and specifically referenced issues such as incorrect visuals, mismatched scenes, and difficulty using uploaded assets—all of which we experienced. Despite this acknowledgment, and despite requesting a refund the same day after only a few hours of use, our refund request was denied based solely on policy. This was not a case of extended use or dissatisfaction over time. It was immediately clear that the platform could not deliver what was advertised, yet no refund was offered or considered. In summary: The platform did not deliver on its core advertised functionality The “no limits” claim is constrained by a costly credit system Additional purchases did not resolve fundamental issues The generated output was not usable without extensive editing The 7-day guarantee is effectively voided by attempting to use the product The company acknowledged these issues but still denied a same-day refund We strongly encourage other organizations—especially nonprofits or small teams with limited budgets—to proceed with caution and fully understand the limitations and costs before committing. This was a costly and disappointing experience for our organization. **Pros:** The concept and marketing are very appealing. The idea of being able to quickly create videos from simple prompts using your own content is exactly what we were looking for as a small nonprofit **Cons:** The platform did not function as advertised. It failed to reliably use uploaded assets, generated incorrect and mismatched visuals, and required significant editing despite claiming none would be needed. The credit system made it costly to even attempt basic functionality, as credits were consumed without producing usable results. Even after acknowledging these issues, support denied a same-day refund. [Read All 409 Reviews](https://www.capterra.com/p/180680/InVideo/reviews/) ## How should I be thinking about software pricing? [ Be an Informed Buyer: Understanding the True Cost of Business Software It's not just you-budgeting for business software is complicated. We're here to break it down. ](https://www.capterra.com/resources/business-software-cost/)