# Page 2 | Aptean Discrete Manufacturing ERP Made2Manage Edition Reviews 2026. Verified Reviews, Pros & Cons | Capterra > Page 2 - Is Aptean Discrete Manufacturing ERP Made2Manage Edition the right Enterprise Resource Planning solution for you? Explore 68 verified user reviews from people in industries like yours to make a confident choice. Source: https://www.capterra.com/p/212403/Made2Manage-ERP/reviews --- Aptean Discrete Manufacturing ERP Made2Manage Edition 3.4 (68) [View alternatives](https://www.capterra.com/p/212403/Made2Manage-ERP/alternatives/) Provider data verified by our Software Research team, and reviews moderated by our Reviews Verification team. [Learn more](https://www.capterra.com/our-story/) * * * Last updated March 13th, 2026 # Page 2 - Reviews of Aptean Discrete Manufacturing ERP Made2Manage Edition ## Showing most helpful reviews Showing 26-50 of 68 Reviews Sort by: Most Helpful Rating Company Size Reviewer's Role Length of Use Frequency of Use AH Andrea H. Administrative Assistant Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Made to Manage more like Made to Damage" October 18, 2018 2.0 In 2006 the company I worked for was sold M2M as a ERP system that would make our business paperless (mostly) We killed more trees after installing it. The notifiers were less than helpful and most users stopped looking at them because the information was useless. When it came to digesting information in the system to make sense of what are actual inventory #'s were or job statuses we had to have a programmer write a script that pulled the info from M2M and redesigned it into something legible using Excel. He finally wrote the script to include BOM (parent/children) where used, pick tickets for each machine build or job running through our machine shop as well as parts orders. The features we needed were just not there. So they promised it would fix it in the next update, then the next one and next until we on 6.5 which crashed our network (some type of bug) The field service module which was purchased as an addition did also not work as promised. All BOM would have to be loaded in order to create a service case, then create a sales order or work order from there. Pros M2M is very easy to learn and easy to navigate. Can be customized but for a price. If there are other users in your area M2M offers user group meetings that can be very informational. They also have M2M university which is a series of in depth how to's on the various functions within the system. Can set each user to only have access to things pertaining to their job function within the company. Cons Not a paperless system!! Reporting is awful. Newest version allows for too many mistakes. Areas that should not be able to be edited are still open once saved; including the inventory screen! After latest update UPS Worldship interface no longer worked. Sure they offer customization however unless they have an overwhelming demand for the feature your company may need to do business the charges to write the script and update your version are high. When sending a service trouble shooting ticket do not expect an answer right away. It typically takes there service team several days to respond and most of the time the answer is we need to look further into it. Review Source DG Dennis G. Used the software for: ### "" August 20, 2013 3.0 Since we went live July 1, we are still getting acquainted with the software. Overall, we are satisfied with the functionality and believe that it is a good fit for our type of business. We manufacture large positioning systems used for welding and other applications. Some of our products are of a catalogue variety and others are engineered to order. M2M's use of job orders that tie everything together for tracking and cost analysis is going to be a big help to us. We are using the ERP system and Advanced Scheduling at the present time. We have created a few Advanced Reporting reports using preexisting sphere,s and one sphere that we created. Except for some training our implementation consultant provided for financial reports, we have to learn how use Advanced Reporting on our own because the trainer has not been available. We decided before our conference room pilots to delay implementation of the configuration and CAD link software. The implementation process was handicapped by version 7 software bugs. It was awful! We had to surrender hours of consulting time that we paid for because of the issues we encountered while doing our conference room pilots, and had to delay portions of the work while hot patches were installed. We required more consulting days because of this. Our consultant was not up-to-speed on the version 7, and needed to go back and forth between Classic and the net versions. Our users trained using the version 7 training videos. However, they would need to use version 6 videos because ones for version 7 were not available. We had decided to write procedures converting version 5 Word documents to have version 7 screens shots. There were so many problems with version 7; it seems crazy that it was released in that condition! We were told that the software had been beta tested and had been used for a year by some number of users. That doesn't seem possible. It was not possible for our field sales group to go live with the rest of the company because response time for a remote user was extremely slow - 15 minutes or more to get a report to display. It was a big surprise. We had implemented a dedicated server for M2M in accordance with Aptean specifications. It turned out that we needed to invest in a dedicated server for our field sales group. We have not completed our month-end close for July. There were numerous problems with data that slowed the process. We experienced some issues with the transfer of work orders and sales orders. In some cases, the wrong selection was made in the setup. From our training, we seem to taken away how to process basic transactions, but we didn't take away a good understanding of the transactions. We knew the steps but without understanding what was happening when made them. This created some problems for job orders and purchase orders carried forward from the old system to M2M. Our closing was hampered because we didn't have certain reports needed to tie out transactions to support GL values. Not having been trained in the use of Advanced Reporting meant that we had to stop what we were doing, and figure out how to create them ourselves. Vanessa was able to help with the financial reports, but was not so helpful for ones requiring the use of spheres. The old quote, "Other than that Mrs. Lincoln, how did you like the play." comes to mind. Any benefits that we may eventually see from using the software has been overshadowed by the difficulty with version 7 and training issues. Review Source MG Mary G. Used the software for: ### "" August 28, 2013 4.0 As a job shop providing - primarily - custom products to customer design specifications, we have small production runs and little finished inventory. But we have lots of costs! Our previous software was great for accounting but did little to address collection, assimilation or analysis of production data. We examined ERP software and decided M2M would answer those questions and, as a result, we'd be better able to move our business forward. We recently (Feb/Mar 2013) upgraded to M2M 7.01 (from version 5.6). Thankfully there are two versions - classic, which looks and acts like our older version; and .NET, with a sleeker appearance and more direct functionality. Most of our employees are very comfortable with the Classic version. The more adventurous of the staff use the .NET as often as possible, reverting to the Classic only when we get "lost" - or, on rare occasion, when there's a hole in .NET (and, yes, there are still a few). Management is enduring extensive training on 7.0 modules. Our philosophy is that now is the time to make corrections and adjustments to the way we do things. This version is quite powerful and more user-friendly, but it takes some getting used to. And we want to do it "right", or as "right" as possible. The online recorded courses have been instrumental in launching discussion and decisions. As a result, we are comfortable moving our employees into the more modern system presented by this version and out of their comfort zone(s). M2M personnel have been helpful, for the most part. We did not use a reseller (our first - and last - experience with a M2M reseller was less than pleasant or productive) but used M2M staff for the upgrade and install. Getting to the upgrade/install point was often challenging (like pulling teeth to get anyone to return calls) but it's been good ever since. We still have additional training that needs to be done, but before we'll bring that in, we want to be fully - as much as possible - conversant with the software so we can ask intelligent and meaningful questions and get the most of those limited training hours. Some improvements we like in .NET would be ease of changing data/data tables, better windows and customizable screens, having "favorites" very accessible, access to reports for minor customizations, planning and scheduling/CRM modules (although we don't really know how to use them yet), and quick and easy exports to Excel (some of us are spreadsheet geeks). There's undoubtedly some more that escapes me right now. Would we purchase M2M again? Well, we've invested quite a lot in this software, as we've been using it since 2001. We've learned that no system is perfect and it doesn't hurt that my staff has threatened me with bodily harm if I change at this point! We're excited with the improvements the 7.0 offers. There's more that we'd like to see upgraded but it's getting there, and we've learned (and will continue to learn) how to manipulate M2M to be the best it can be! Review Source BG Brian G. IT Manager Plastics Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Made2Manage" October 1, 2019 4.0 It has been a very stable system for us, especially after upgrading to 7.50, then 7.51. We are running it on a Hyper-V 2012 R2 server which is shared by the 2014 MS-SQL database. The physical machine is running all SSD's and speed has not been an issue. We run it on Windows 7 and 10. Overall, we are able to effectively run the company with M2M and has become very routine for us. We have been using M2M since 2000 and version 5.5. Pros The software has evolved a lot in the past few years. Many of the reviews are based on old versions of the software, and there was a lot of room for improvement. The latest version (7.51) is a huge improvement on previous versions. The interface is much cleaner and the logic a lot better. The new ability (7.50) for any user to easily export data from a browse window (almost every screen) and from any report is a big deal. The overall look is more Windows-like, but retains the same general forms as before; great if you are upgrading. When it looks like M2M improperly calculates something, it always turns out to be something a user did, allowing me to trust the system. Cons Sometimes it is hard to figure out what a field on a form is for based on the description alone, leaving it up to each user to decide how to use it. For the most part, this only comes into play for features we don't use. Review Source VR Verified Reviewer Staff Accountant Hospital & Health Care Used the software for: 2+ years ### "User Friendly for All Ages" April 10, 2023 4.0 Overall, this is the best ERP I have used. I have used QAD, SAP, and Plex in other jobs but this is by far the best software I have encountered. As long as you have an IT professional that can customize reports, the sky is the limit with this program. The newest update did kill the look and made it more modern but the user-friendliness is still there. Pros Ease of useCustomizationShortcutsEasy to add/build reports Cons Lack of Cost Accounting toolsMinor glitches here and there (could be related to the business using it) Review Source TS Tom S. Used the software for: ### "" August 20, 2013 3.5 We are a 22 year old manufacturer of Cable & Wire Harness assemblies, with 50 employees. In the 90's we were using an $800 program, PCMRP to track our inventory, and Peachtree to do our accounting. In 2000 we decided to upgrade our system to a fully integrated management system and after several demonstrations, we chose M2M. Implementation was difficult and we almost abandoned the project, but in retrospect we were forced to change the way we do things and we are a better company as a result. As a job shop, BOM and Routing accuracy is critical in managing your operation, and variance reporting is used to refine your processes. The standard reports are informative, but we have also had to write our own reports and have paid to have some custom reports as well. We did not expect M2M to come with every report we needed, and we took the report writing classes which were helpful. We have hosted the San Diego Users Group, and are also members of the Los Angeles Users Group. We find these groups helpful, as other manufacturers sometimes have a better way to solve problems than a software company. We have upgraded several times from 3.6 to 4.0 to 5.1 to 5.6 and are now on 6..01. The next upgrade is to 7.0, but we are not sure we want to go to that, as it requires a different operating system; and these upgrades are tedious, expensive, and frustrating. Had we known then what we know now, we would have stayed on version 5.6, because 6.01 did very little for us and actually created some problems. The customer service module was much better on 5.6. We were recently awarded AS9100 and ISO9001/2008 certifications. The software does little to help us with that, although M2M has been suggesting they have a lot to offer for quality system management. That is just not the case. Since M2M has been sold or merged (twice that we know of) we find the customer support has declined in the last decade. Its harder to get immediate answers and it takes longer for tech support to get back to respond to your case. The good news is, there are some excellent people that we are privileged to know there, and we call them directly and get the answers. Some people have left the company due to the changes, but many of our go-to people are still there. So after 13 years, we are most definitely an M2M company. It works for us, we understand it, and we are comfortable with it. We would like to use it indefinitely, depending on the cost. We find the annual fees excessive, especially since support is not as good as it once was. The fact that they are offering to "lock in" a fee schedule over 5 years reminds us of health insurance skyrocketing.Hopefully this will not be the case. We want to stay with M2M. Review Source EB Eric B. Used the software for: ### "" August 27, 2013 3.0 We have been using Made2Manage for 15 years in a make-to-order, discreet, manufacturing environment. We have seen the product go through two acquisitions and mergers in that time. Currently, we are on version 6.01 which uses Visual Fox Pro 9 to connect to a Microsoft SQL Server 2008 R2 database. Made2Manage is surprisingly feature-rich and has more functionality than most other ERP systems in their class. Certainly more than those I have worked with in the SMB market. However, the software's reliance upon Visual Fox Pro does leave it vulnerable to occasional database or report corruption which causes problems ranging from minor data loss to erratic changes in functionality and inconsistent reporting. Unfortunately, the quality of the product will never be where we need it to be until they can completely divorce themselves from Visual Fox Pro and do a full rewrite. Aptean touts their new version 7 as being a .NET based program, but one of their consultants told us that only the interface is written in .NET and that reporting and database operations are still handled by Visual Fox Pro, which according to Microsoft, goes completely out of support in 2015. Made2Manage support has been very difficult for us. They are hands-down the most lacking support organization I have worked with in my entire career. Most of the issues with the product are caused by database errors which can be found and repaired with a few simple SQL queries that search for duplicate or missing primary keys. Although, in our experience it can be extremely difficult to convince their technicians of the existence of erratic behavior, they have, on occasion, admitted to having bugs. At last count, our company had upwards of 17 open change requests dating back to as early as 2005 to address these issues. Most frustrating is the exclusion of custom reports from their scope of support. By and large, the vast majority of our issues relate to problems with spontaneous corruption in reports which can cause the same report to print and/or display in different formats or with different data at different times. This corruption is an inherent problem with Visual Fox Pro and is most evident to loyal, long-time customers like us who have been through several upgrades. However, Made2Manage support will not look at these issues without an additional customization fee which was quoted to us as $225/hr with a one-hour minimum. We found an independent consultant that only charges $100/hr and now regularly use him. He typically has the problem fixed in less time than it would take to open a case with Aptean. Review Source RS Ron S. Purchasing Automotive Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Made 2 Manage Review" March 19, 2019 3.0 Pros Has all the functions needed for our business Cons On many occasions there are redundant steps needed to accomplish on function Review Source TD Tim D. Purchasing Agent Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Purchasing/Inventory tracking" July 21, 2016 2.5 Pros I like the Inventory set up of the program. Easily able to purchase/manage material for multiple locations within one system. navigating between each location and knowing their Inventory levels and sales history is fairly simple. Creating Blanket P.O.s is also a function I like, creating them is easy and they are very easy for my vendors to read and understand. Cons I do not like the fact you can manually change Average cost, that should be driven by purchases/sales and should not be able to be changed by anyone using the system. I do not like the receiving function. If you make an error in the lines you want to receive, you can't add them during the process, you have to go back and start over. Review Source LL Lynn L. Executive Assistant Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Great product for small to mid size manufacturers" March 21, 2018 4.0 Pros Manage your business from beginning to end. Outstanding support department. Product improvements are finally keeping pace with customer needs. Cons Licensing and support are expensive. It is also costly to implement optional modules. Consulting is also speedy but dependable and reliable. Review Source PT Paul T. Used the software for: ### "" August 20, 2013 4.0 We have used M2M since October 2009. We were not satisfied with the time and effort required to maintain our prior system and the reporting was not user-friendly nor accurate. Looking back now, we are in a much better position in terms of business awareness, integration, and reporting. I like how all aspects of our business is incorporated into the ERP (order entry, procurement, accounting and scheduling) so we don't have separate databases for everything. We have had to introduce many new personnel to M2M, and although it has taken some time, we all feel very comfortable with the current system. Our heavy users are still trying to get additional tools out of the system but I think we will get there with time. I am the primary user of the support portal and I have mixed feelings. When I eventually get someone from tech support to assist on the case, they are usually well-informed and helpful. I would like to see support cases addressed more quickly, though. At times, it takes one to two days just to hear back from a tech support personnel even on high priority and urgent cases. At times, this has gotten us into trouble or slowed down our productive capacity. We look to uncover more tools and becoming more M2M savvy through the online material as well as seminars and other user contacts. Overall, we have been pleased with the experience and would recommend the product to companies similar to ours. Review Source MS Michael S. Controller Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Awesome for one-stop software in Manufacturing" October 23, 2018 4.0 Pros Easy to change reports and have setup how your company requires it. Excellent support from Made2Manage throughout install and an usage. Cons Can be a bit bulky for smaller organization, but if you are a larger company 50+ employees, it should be okay. Review Source JH Jerry H. Network Admin Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing Used the software for: 2+ years ### "M2M ver 7" March 14, 2018 4.0 Pros Good product overall, been a long journey to get off VFP, but they are getting there. Support is great and gets you the answers needed. Cons Maintenance is costly. Not a cheap program. Interface is dated. could use a face lift to more modern look. Review Source SJ Stan J. Used the software for: ### "" August 20, 2013 4.0 We are a reseller and fabricator of high explosives. Our journey to find a new ERP system was lengthy and difficult due to the ATF and DOD requirements placed upon our business. After looking for almost a full year, we decided upon M2M based upon a very well presented demo. It was until six months later that we found the software could not do what was promised. M2M has worked very diligently attempting to make M2M work for us and we were told that these modifications would become standard functionally, and that M2M would pay for all customizations until they were standard functionally. Today, after 20 months of customizations and heartache, we are still not fully functional on M2M. Hopefully, M2M can keep their commitments this time and have this wrapped up by the end of September. I am also hearing that M2M has no intention of making our requirements standard functionally and we are trying to get answers as to what is going to happen when it is time to upgrade. I believe that M2M is making a huge mistake by passing on this chance to add standard functionally that can be used by the explosives industry, as well as other industries, which are regulated by the FDA, etc. Basically, I believe M2M to be a good product. IT was over sold and now we are living with the consequences of it. Review Source PH Paul H. Used the software for: ### "" August 21, 2013 3.5 Our company is a production plant that specializes in hand bindry, over-wrapping, and folding. We are seldom doing the same type of jobs, since we have a large customer base and there's a lot of different and unique projects for us to work on. Our company looked for a different program to capture some of the cost that the previous program did not. M2M did this part well. M2M has been easy to learn, but most of the learning was on our own. We had issues when we first got the program and was being trained. Our trainer was not very good and could not explain or fix the problems we had. It was always "show me an example". When we showed him an example, it was then "show me another". The problems we were having turned out to be easy fixes after we learned the program, simply by using it. The only issues we have now is once a shipping document has been confirmed, we cannot add anything. With our business, they are always changing quantities after we produced the paperwork. We are currently working at ways to get around this, but it is time consuming. We have not used the customer support in my area since we got the program. As stated earlier, the program has captured true cost for jobs and shipping. This has benefited our company. Review Source RL Rob L. Used the software for: ### "" August 28, 2013 4.0 I am new to my role (one-man IT shop) and also my company. Made2Manage has been the backbone of our business for 15 years, thus the administration and maintenance of the product is probably my primary responsibility out of all the responsibilities I have here. We are currently using v5.6 because we are very reliant on the older, less involved Configurator. We do not have a person with the capabilities in both technology and our production, that is required to run and maintain the new Configurator. Of course, this is causing problems as more and more of our old 32-bit, Windows XP workstations are being replaced by 64-bit, Windows 7 workstations. Much of my M2M responsibility is assisting our users with the workarounds required so that v5.6 and Win7 can exist. It would be ideal, of course, if we could hire or devote an employee to the care and feeding of the new Configurator, so we could upgrade our M2M installation to a version that supports Windows 7. But with our resources, that is simply not possible at this time. Our M2M support has been mixed since our old IT Director left the company. He had built many relationships with members of the Aptean staff which I unfortunately did not really acquire. Review Source JT Janet T. Used the software for: ### "" August 28, 2013 2.0 We are a discrete job shop manufacturer who makes capital equipment. We run the SQL version 6.01 of Made2Manage. There are things I love about Made2Manage include the ease of navigation and ability to go directly to any screen using the mnemonic name of the screen; the ability to have read-only access to the data tables using Microsoft Access so that I can create my own reporting; the linkage between screens enabling quick lookup of other screens relating to the same data; the ability to drill-down utilizing the Explorer function; and the Shop Floor Manager is really slick. There are things that really need improvement though. There are many problems with reports the system generates, particularly Accounting reports that we have had to create "work-around" processes in order to handle. The Cash Flow report does not calculate properly, the income statement does not calculate % of sales correctly, the income statement does not correctly report "Net Profit Before Tax", and many more. As a management accountant at the Controller level, I have used many different ERP systems in my career. I would not recommend Made2Manage. Review Source TS Terie S. Used the software for: ### "" August 20, 2013 4.5 White's Electronics, Inc. manufactures metal detectors for the sport and hobby market, however, we are looking at new markets for diversification. We are a make to stock company. When we purchased M2M in 2007, we were looking for a product where we wouldn't have to modify every screen and report to get the information the way we needed. We didn't want to have to buy a lot of add on products to get the information. M2M seemed to meet our requirements. We have modified some reports and screens and M2M provides tools to do this. Our users like the fact that they can export almost any report to excel and use it they way they want. The online courses are very helpful and the users refer to them often. They users were able to adapt to the features and use of M2M fairly quickly. We have 20 licenses, however, we have 40 users. We use the time out feature to keep logins available. We use Advanced Scheduling to keep our inventory to a minimum. We are currently working on a test machine to upgrade to 7.01. Our live company is using 6.02 SP5 HP4. Review Source AD Angela D. Used the software for: ### "" August 27, 2013 4.0 Our company started out as a job shop, but has quickly grown into a production make-to-stock environment in most of our plants. One of our facilities uses M2M as a make to order software and our other nine locations use it in the make-to-stock environment. We implemented M2M many years ago and only used it for AR and AP, but in the last 1.5 years, we've begun using all aspects of the software and have also added the Margin Analyzer. Prior to this full implementation, spreadsheets were our common place but we are whittling them away one by one. We are on version 6 and have found many of the improvements helpful. Our team has learned to use the tools in M2M quickly and like how it works. The other special part about our company is we use many customizations, including custom scrap software, custom time clocks, customer posting software - just to name a few. We appreciate the support Aptean provides every day as we continue to improve our usage of the software. They work well with us on the customizations we need in our environment. Review Source ZA Zaighum A. Office Admin Automotive Used the software for: 6-12 months ### "Made2 Manage ERP" February 28, 2020 4.0 Made 2 mange ERP is beat option for modern world because this ERP system has automatic updates alerts which is best for business. Pros In made2manage ERP i like the inventory control system because user can easily control the stock quantity and product pricing. Cons In made 2 manage erp is did not find any technical and graphical error in inventory section. Made 2 mange erp is the complete solution of inventory system. Review Source DR Donna R. Used the software for: ### "" August 20, 2013 4.0 Brim Laundry Machinery is a manufacturer of Industrial Laundry equipment. Some of the machines can hold up to 900 lbs. of laundry. We mostly sell to uniform companies, hospitals, the military, and the federal government. We started building our own equipment back in the 1990's, and at that time were issuing parts manually and not keeping up with the time at all. When we found M2M were looking for a program that could easily use, but still keep up with the BOM, labor, and materials without a lot of paperwork. The supervisor doesn't want to have to put to much work into making Job Order, so its pretty good for him. You can really use it as much or little as you want, depending on the information you want to get out of the system. We have had M2M since 2000 and have had several implementations; they always goes pretty well and, for the most part, we haven't had too many problems. But when we do have problems M2M customer support has always been helpful and professional. Review Source AD Alex D. ERP/MRP Implementation Manager Mechanical or Industrial Engineering Used the software for: 6-12 months ### "Hired to migrate M2M from 7.0 to 7.5 w/Advanced Planning & Scheduling" July 14, 2016 2.5 Pros M2M has most of the functionality and reports needed to run a manufacturing operation, including Shop Floor Manager that helps to monitor activity on the production floor. Cons At the 7.0 level there are problems with MRP weekly buckets and reports are difficult to modify (still in MS VFP). The quality of the tutorials varies from subject to subject. Managing parts at multiple locations is very cumbersome as you are required to create a new part # for each part at each off-site location. Customer support can be spotty and the cost for custom reports is quite expensive. Review Source SH Sharon H. Used the software for: ### "" August 27, 2013 3.5 We have been using M2M for approximately 7 years now. Our company is a manufacturer of precision equipment. We don't normally do large batches, but often just one or two units at a time, with "tweaks" on every piece, which makes it difficult at times to get accurate information into, and out of, M2M. It is, however, a vast improvement over the system we used prior to this. Using it on a daily basis, I find it fairly easy to use, although we have had to find quite a few "work-arounds" and it is not always as user friendly as some would like. When it comes to customer support, I've had both positive and not so positive experiences. In general, most parts of my job are fairly easy using M2M, now that I am able to work around some of the problem areas. I have to do more manual work than I would like, but I do appreciate being able to save everything in excel. A definite plus there! Review Source NL Nick L. Used the software for: ### "" August 20, 2013 4.5 I've been with M2M since 1991! We looked at dozens of ERP systems and M2M was the best suited for our small company. The M2M van is what sealed the deal, when they pulled into our parking lot and gave a complete demo. In 1991 that was pretty advanced! What keeps me loyal are the employees of M2M with their help over the years and on a daily basis. I wish I could name them all but people like Mark Buck, Chris Derbyshire, and Neal Turner, define amazing customer service at it's best! I think two of those three we there in 1991, but I don't want to make anyone look old so I won't identify them. One thing that concerns me is that when M2M found out I was using an independent consultant to convert from Fox to SQL, I was given the feeling that I was on my own! It would be nice to get an open line for help on the many conversion questions that come up. Review Source JA Jaime A. Used the software for: ### "" August 28, 2013 4.5 I've been using M2M since Sept. of 2012. The software is very powerful and extremely easy to learn and use. In two to three weeks of use I was very comfortable using it. I'm not sure what rev level my plant is actually on, and/or what improvements might be available that we are not taking advantage of, but what I've seen and experienced of it, I can say that I recommend it without hesitation. The plant is a medium voltage metal-clad custom manufacturing facility. The package is used for employee time sheets, bidding jobs, scheduling and tracking of labor/materials, purchasing materials and equipment, creating shipping bills of lading, and even the invoicing of our customers after the order is delivered. It's a solid, dependable and powerful manufacturing software package. Anyone considering an ERP system should definitely evaluate this package. Review Source Similar Products Featured ## Send me user reviews about this product ### Fill out the form and we'll send a list of the top-rated software based on real user reviews directly to your inbox.