# Ansys medini analyze Reviews 2026. Verified Reviews, Pros & Cons | Capterra > Is Ansys medini analyze the right Workflow Management solution for you? Explore 23 verified user reviews from people in industries like yours to make a confident choice. Source: https://www.capterra.com/p/238340/ANSYS-Medini-Analyze/reviews --- Ansys medini analyze 4 (23) [View alternatives](https://www.capterra.com/p/238340/ANSYS-Medini-Analyze/alternatives/) Provider data verified by our Software Research team, and reviews moderated by our Reviews Verification team. [Learn more](https://www.capterra.com/our-story/) * * * Last updated March 13th, 2026 # Reviews of Ansys medini analyze Ease of use 3.8 Customer Service 4.3 ## Pros and Cons in Reviews DK Dinesh K Senior EngineerElectrical/Electronic Manufacturing, 10,001+ employeesUsed the software for: More than 2 years. “It is a very detailed and useful tool from the concept phase to simulation level analysis with the Simplorer tool with an easy interface.“ November 11, 2021 TI Tony I Sr.Product Safety EngineerAutomotive, 10,001+ employeesUsed the software for: More than 2 years. “Also Medini dont have user friendly options, compare to the classic tools we used for analysis, in particularly where FMEA/FMEDAs even a copy paste is not supported.“ December 9, 2021 EE Estevao E MBSEAviation & Aerospace, 51 - 200 employeesUsed the software for: 1-2 years. “Allows integration with SCADE Architect, Very good support service.“ November 15, 2021 HH Hyunhwa H ResearcherAutomotive, 10,001+ employeesUsed the software for: Less than 6 months. “In the 'structure' tap, it is difficult to make component. And it is not that useful when it comes to select several things.“ November 23, 2021 DK Dinesh K Senior EngineerElectrical/Electronic Manufacturing, 10,001+ employeesUsed the software for: More than 2 years. “Also, it is easy to share models with suppliers, which save time and money.“ November 11, 2021 RV Reshmi V Functional Safety ManagerAutomotive, 10,001+ employeesUsed the software for: 6-12 months. “Currently difficult to search in the help feature.“ November 22, 2021 ## Showing most helpful reviews Showing 1-23 of 23 Reviews Sort by: Most Helpful Rating Company Size Reviewer's Role Length of Use Frequency of Use VR Verified Reviewer R&D Engineer Automotive Used the software for: 6-12 months ### "Easy to use and understand for other engineering functions" November 19, 2021 4.0 Pros So clear understanding report outs. Other functions can understand contributions and results as well. Cons Lite version can be developed to gain time for modeling. Library development can be added. Review Source LN Ludwig N. Functional Safety Engineer Automotive Used the software for: Less than 6 months ### "Ideal tool for FS" November 11, 2021 5.0 It takes time to learn but it is easy to maintain and complete the required documents Pros The possibility to develop the complete product lifecycle for FS, CS and SOTIF Cons There is no straight way to follow the V-cycle process. It is required to jump from a project item to another one continuously to fulfill all the docs Alternatives considered [Enterprise Architect](https://www.capterra.com/p/78757/Enterprise-Architect/)[Polarion ALM](https://www.capterra.com/p/192715/Polarion-ALM/)[Teamcenter](https://www.capterra.com/p/217609/Teamcenter/)[Visio](https://www.capterra.com/p/201133/Visio/) Reason for choosing Ansys medini analyze for including the full product lifecycle of the FS, CS and Sotif Switched from [Microsoft Excel](https://www.capterra.com/p/176574/Excel/) Better maintenance and integration with the team efford Review Source HN Hung N. Functional Safety Engineer Automotive Used the software for: 6-12 months ### "HQN review of Medini Analyze" November 24, 2021 3.0 We are using Medini to implement our Functional Safety Process. Overall, the tools is acceptable. It gets the jobs done with ad hoc works-around that must be manually recreated in different models. Should use SysML or at least UML as template in the same fashion as Sparx System's Enterprise Architect or IBM's Rhapsody. Pros We use all features of Functional Safety analysis. Medini allows us to have all these analysis to be coherently located in a single model. The tool is relatively easy to use. But, create templates to tailor the tool to our existing process is challenging if not impossible without expert help from Ansys. Currently, we cannot integrate Medini with our other tools except by exporting/importing via MS Excel or MS Word. And, this process is cumbersome and prone to errors. Cons Limited SysML capability to model Systems/Items and Functional Safety work products in Medini. Review Source SM Samuele M. System project leader Automotive Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "Ansys medini analyze review from a safety and security user point of view" November 12, 2021 4.0 The expereience is good. We now use it to speed up functional safety and cybersecurity activities for various projects. Pros The most impactful features are the possibility to manage most of the safety life development of a product inside a single tool. Is possible to define an item definition, HARA, derive SG, create functional safety and technical safety concepts, link requirements, perform FMEA, FMEDA, FTA. All in a single environmel and with deep in treacibility. From last version it also features security actvitity. It also integrable with other company tool beacuse it support othe rrequirement managent tool import export (for example Doors). Cons BIRT, the add in integrated to create custom report template, is not easy to use and require some javascript programming knowledge. The user manual of BIRT contains very minimal informations and the only source of help is the Medini forum. Reason for choosing Ansys medini analyze IT offers a complete package to support all functional safety activities, not only FTA. Review Source TI Tony I. Sr.Product Safety Engineer Automotive Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Goiing Good and Need Improvements" December 9, 2021 4.0 The idea is good to have all safety activities in the same tool. still Medini have many blockings for new users, where they feel more easy on the old classic tools than Medini. Pros it covers most of the safety activities and a change done in one activity could reflect on other levels/ activities too. Cons Tool take more memory and hangs a lot. Also Medini dont have user friendly options, compare to the classic tools we used for analysis, in particularly where FMEA/FMEDAs even a copy paste is not supported. Alternatives considered [RAMs](https://www.capterra.com/p/199286/RAMs/)[ITEM ToolKit](https://www.capterra.com/p/59511/ITEM-ToolKit/) Reason for choosing Ansys medini analyze for the well adaptation of ISO26262 Switched from [ITEM ToolKit](https://www.capterra.com/p/59511/ITEM-ToolKit/) Organizational Change. Review Source LL Lucas L. Graduate Functional Safety and Cybersecurity Engineer Semiconductors Used the software for: 6-12 months ### "Medini Analyze Review" November 17, 2021 5.0 Great so far Pros Extensibility: I like it how easy it is to extend the metamodel and enhance the modeling flow with custom scripts. This makes it very easy to adapt medini into pretty much any safety/security analysis workflow. Reporting: The integration with BIRT is fantastic and the fact that you can automatically generate reports from top to bottom and export them in many different formats takes a lot of the burden off of the team. Community: The scripting and reporting forums are a great source for information on how to get the most out of Medini. Integration with external tools: The integration between Medini and tools such as SCADE Architect and Simulink makes the communication between system architects and safety/security engineers very straight forward. Cons I feel like sometimes it is hard to find examples on scripting and reporting. A more extensive documentation covering those would be welcome (especially concerning scripted data sources in reporting). This is a very minor con though, since the support we get in the Medini forums is top notch. But it would be a nice feature to have. Review Source JG Javier G. Model Based Safety Engineer Airlines/Aviation Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "Complete and poweful" November 15, 2021 4.0 Ansys Medini is helping us to define a complete Model Base end to end. All the safety info can be stored in a single file, reducing complexity. Pros High traceability between safety artifacts. All in one. Allows concurrent work with git. Support is good and on time Cons You need to write scripts to increase tool flexibility and automation capabilities. Some bugs arise from time to time. Reporting can be improved. Reason for choosing Ansys medini analyze All in one, link with MBSE Scade Review Source AI Ali I. System Security Engineering Manager Defense & Space Used the software for: 2+ years ### "From security perspective" November 12, 2021 4.0 Quite satisfied Pros My team is using to analyze the attack surface risk rating and threat mapping Cons Lacking of some security control standards like nost and cis Review Source DK Dinesh K. Senior Engineer Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Maxwell and Simplorer user" November 11, 2021 5.0 I have very good experience with Ansys tools, especially Maxwell and Simplorer. It helped me in my project where we reduced time to market time due to good simulation accuracy and prediction of performance before asking for physical samples from suppliers. Also, it is easy to share models with suppliers, which save time and money. Pros I really like the Maxwell tool for magnetic simulation. It is a very detailed and useful tool from the concept phase to simulation level analysis with the Simplorer tool with an easy interface. Cons Sometimes it is difficult to remember all tips and tricks to improve simulation speed and accuracy especially if tool used after some time. Review Source VR Verified Reviewer Project Engineer Automotive Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "Review: ANSYS Medini Analyze" February 20, 2023 5.0 Pros 1\. The best-integrated feature application to speed up functional safety activities.2. The easy linking of safety analyses and requirements created in DOORS. Cons 1\. Tool takes more system memory and hangs a lot. 2. Software doesn't have many user-friendly options when compared to other applications. Review Source sM salman M. Functional Safety Engineer Automotive Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Pros and Cons" November 16, 2021 4.0 functional safety analysis of automotive projects Pros the traceability feature is excellent, easy to use and follow. FTA feature is extra ordinary. make it lot easier to arrange and re-arrange. Cons 1\. it should be in a common server so that anyone with access can leave comment and update. at the end, the complete process can trace all the updates in one version, not in several. 2. does not have any easy way to share the work. need to generate \*.mprx file in order to share the work / updates. very difficult to follow up which one has the latest update. Review Source SH Shipin H. System Engineer Automotive Used the software for: Less than 6 months ### "It is very good product for Functional Safety analysis." November 16, 2021 5.0 I used it for the Functional Safety Hardware development, it is very useful tool, especially for the FMEDA and FTA analysis. Pros FMEDA sheet for the FIT value analysis. Cons The support of the Java scripts, and also the generation of the documents need to be further improved. Review Source RT Rajavivekanandh T. Consultant - Automotive Automotive Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "Risk assessment" November 22, 2021 4.0 Pros Improved Features to customize templates Cons It would be helpful to simply the process to work in parallel (e.g., see result in real-time) instead of creating a won version and merging it at the end Review Source MM Mohammad M. Mechanical Engineer Consumer Electronics Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Electronics S&V simulation use" November 16, 2021 4.0 Pros Setting up the model is detailed and straghtforward Cons The link to other similar softwares can be improved. Review Source RV Reshmi V. Functional Safety Manager Automotive Used the software for: 6-12 months ### "Medini Analyse for Safety Analyses" November 22, 2021 4.0 Good experience Pros Ability to integrate the system architecture and requirements with the safety analyses and maintain the traceability between the different safety stages Cons Feel that Help feature could be better. Currently difficult to search in the help feature. Review Source ST Shwetal T. Consultant Automotive Used the software for: Less than 6 months ### "Tool is easy to use but hard to have access. I faced lot of Administrative problems." November 18, 2021 3.0 Tool is easy to use but hard to have access. I faced lot of Administrative problems. Pros Tool is easy to use. Features are helpful. Cons I faced lot of Administrative problems. Review Source KC Kathryn C. Sensing Performance Engineer Automotive Used the software for: 6-12 months ### "ANSYS Software Review" November 15, 2021 3.0 Pros I appreciate the classes and tutorials/examples that are provided through the ANSYS portal. Cons The software looks old and outdated. I also wish the icons by default had word labels. It is hard for a newcomer to know they need to turn those on. Review Source MM Mobin M. Systems Leader Automotive Used the software for: Less than 6 months ### "Medini for Functional Safety Activities" November 21, 2021 5.0 Ansys team was very helpful , they have provide training before during the start and also provided temp license as soon as the order is confirmed which avoided further delay in starting the activities . Pros Ansys team has given a good introduction to the tool as soon as its purchased and it helped the team initially as the team was new to the tool. Cons Tool is being used for the functional safety activities currently and it works well for the purpose. Review Source CG Can G. RAMS Engineer Transportation/Trucking/Railroad Used the software for: Less than 6 months ### "For those who care about traceability" November 12, 2021 4.0 Pros One of the best features of the program is the easy linking of safety analyzes and requirements created in DOORS. And also having folders such as FTA, FMECA, hazard log, safety plan etc. on the same platform provides convenience for companies. Cons We thought that it was directly integrated with the fault tree+ program, but it took much more time than we expected. As a suggestion, a library prepared on the basis of EN 5012X standards used in rail systems will accelerate the spread of the program to the sector. Review Source EE Estevao E. MBSE Aviation & Aerospace Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "Medini Review" November 15, 2021 3.0 Pros Allows integration with SCADE Architect, Very good support service. Cons Buggy software, strong need of scripting skills for customization. Review Source SP Sachin P. Sr engineer Transportation/Trucking/Railroad Used the software for: I used a free trial ### "Best hazard and operability (HAZOP) analysis" November 16, 2021 4.0 Great tool for reduction in the time needed to complete functional safety analysis Pros safety analysis methods (HAZOP, HARA, FHA, FTA.) Cons model-based approach very intuitive and user-friendly, Review Source HH Hyunhwa H. Researcher Automotive Used the software for: Less than 6 months ### "Review of ansys software" November 23, 2021 3.0 Pros It is kind of easy to use. The icon of this software look easy and simple. So the users who use this first can understand fast and easily Cons In the 'structure' tap, it is difficult to make component. And it is not that useful when it comes to select several things. (I cannot select several components at one with ctrl+shift or drag) Review Source SA Suhail A. Product Engineer Machinery Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "User from TCAO" November 15, 2021 4.0 Pros Ease of usage , Easy to to visualize and except Cons Training material availability, Not much online resources Review Source Similar Products Featured ## Send me user reviews about this product ### Fill out the form and we'll send a list of the top-rated software based on real user reviews directly to your inbox.