---
title: "SpectralOps Reviews 2026. Verified Reviews, Pros & Cons | Capterra"
description: "Is SpectralOps the right Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solution for you? Explore 7 verified user reviews from people in industries like yours to make a confident choice."
source_url: "https://www.capterra.com/p/238726/SpectralOps/reviews/"
page_type: "reviews"
language: "en"
publication_date: "2026-09-29"
---

SpectralOps

4.6 (7)

Provider data verified by our Software Research team, and reviews moderated by our Reviews Verification team. [Learn more](https://www.capterra.com/our-story/)

* * *

Last updated September 29th, 2026

# Reviews of SpectralOps

Ease of use

4.1

Customer Service

4.9

## Showing most helpful reviews

Showing 1-7 of 7 available reviews

Sort by:

Most Helpful

Rating

Company Size

Reviewer's Role

Length of Use

Frequency of Use

R

Reviewer  
Chief architect  
Used the software for: 1-3 years

### "Spectral is a reliable gatekeeper for our secrets"

November 11, 2021

5.0

Pros

Spectral is easy to set up and use, and it provides valuable insights into sensitive issues.

Cons

The reports can be better, with more options to slice & dice the issues.

Review Source

R

Reviewer  
DevOps Tech Lead  
Used the software for: 1-3 years

### "Great for code secutity"

November 11, 2021

4.0

It helps us with fixing open code and key security issues in public and private repos

Pros

I like the daily scan of all our repositories, it helps us to fix importent security issues in the code. Also the support team is very good .

Cons

The UI was slowly in performance. Also some settings issues (but this was resolved by support)

Review Source

R

Reviewer  
Cyber security engineer  
Used the software for: Less than 1 year

### "Solved our headache with Azure DevOps"

November 11, 2021

4.0

We've solved the issue of having zero visibility into our ADO environment with SpectralOps.

Pros

Integrates easily into ADO, allowing us to track down exposures which we previously had no knowledge about.

Cons

Would be good to see a snippet of the offending code inside the portal without needing to navigate to the source. No ability to customise the 'Code' tab, would be handy to adjust the order in which we're seeing issues. I.e: Date / Secret / Info / Severity / Status. The term 'Error' for exposures can get slightly confusing, would prefer to see the term 'Open Secret' or 'At Risk'. No ability to directly test a code block for secret exposures directly through the portal.

Review Source

Verified Reviewer  
CEO  
Used the software for: Less than 1 year

### "Save all your date, win tranquility"

December 20, 2022

5.0

Pros

The easy it is to use, the User Interface, how it protect all your data, and how easy it is to recover.

Cons

Probably is not integrated as Google software, or any other software.

Review Source

R

Reviewer  
DevOps Lead  
Used the software for: 3-5 years

### "Very nice yet not fully polished."

December 7, 2021

5.0

Pros

Scanning speed, support and speed of development

Cons

Missing UI features Many false alerts, for example the Github action workflow file is failing on itself because it contains curl to a script with a pipe to sh ("curl spectral.io/script.sh | sh")

Review Source

R

Reviewer  
CEO  
Used the software for: Less than 1 year

### "Awesome"

December 8, 2021

5.0

Pros

It's like a guard that watching your team from make security mistakes

Cons

Needed to contact the company in order to find how to start the trial. Hard to find the link

Review Source

R

Reviewer  
Tech lead  
Used the software for: 1-3 years

### "\\"

December 10, 2021

4.0

Pros

Good notifications and monitoring. Easy integration.

Cons

Some detectors are too aggressive Customisation.

Review Source

Similar Products

Featured