# Page 2 | SpiraTeam Reviews 2026. Verified Reviews, Pros & Cons | Capterra > Page 2 - Is SpiraTeam the right DevOps solution for you? Explore 98 verified user reviews from people in industries like yours to make a confident choice. Source: https://www.capterra.com/p/85434/SpiraTeam/reviews --- SpiraTeam 4.2 (98) Provider data verified by our Software Research team, and reviews moderated by our Reviews Verification team. [Learn more](https://www.capterra.com/our-story/) * * * Last updated April 29th, 2026 # Page 2 - Reviews of SpiraTeam ## Showing most helpful reviews Showing 26-50 of 98 Reviews Sort by: Most Helpful Rating Company Size Reviewer's Role Length of Use Frequency of Use PM Peter M. Test Analyst Financial Services Used the software for: 2+ years ### "SpiraTeam - The HP ALM/HPQC Killer" September 16, 2020 4.0 My philosophy is that the tool should fit the project, not the other way round, so I use as and when the project requires. All my tests begin life as Excel checklists. If we have specific requirements then I will make use of the Requirements and map them to Test Scripts to get full traceability from a requirements, through testing, through defect management to reporting of test coverage. We write and maintain our own legacy systems, so most of our projects only have high level requirements, hence there is little point using the full suite of SpiraTeam, as it is overkill for such small projects. For most projects, SpiraTeam is used as more of a project place holder at a very high level to track project details and capture any requirements documentation. It is inefficient to write test scripts in Excel for small projects and import them in to SpiraTeam and execute them from SpiraTeam, as this is a needless duplication of effort. I've implemented Exploratory Testing, so test scripts are high level one-liners, reading more like a checklist than a typical Step 1, Step 2, Step 3 style of test scripts. Familiarity with our own in-house software renders the need to write detailed step by step tests redundant. When new legislation is passed that we must comply with, I use SpiraTeam for Test Management to dot the I's and cross the T's, making use of requirements capture, test scripting, requirements mappings, test execution, defect management and Reporting. Pros Easier and more user-friendly to use than HP ALM/QC, whilst offering a similar level of comprehensive features, for a lot less outlay than HP's ALM/QC, IBM, CompuWare etc. is flexible enough to be used differently for each project. For example, SpiraTeam can be used as a document repository for one project, just a test script and test execution tool for another, and as a full blown project life cycle tool encompassing requirements, tests, defects, management and reporting functions. The support provided by Inflectra is head and shoulders above the competition, showing the big boys how it should be done. Responses are prompt and with plenty of examples relevant to your industry sector to help get you going. Don't be surprised if \[SENSITIVE CONTENT HIDDEN\] himself replies to your support request. It seems that the company's sales team are well versed in using the software tools that they sell. For us, it is the support that wins out over any rivals. Pricing is clear and upfront, unlike some of the smoke and mirrors sales tactics used by other vendors who shall remain nameless but here are some hints ... Has Problems, It Breaks More and Don't Expect to Last Long. Cons Upgrading from 5.4 to 6.0 fails. In the past upgrading other vendor tools has been a deal breaker when it failed. A tool should be able to upgrade itself without throwing any SQL errors or similar. Administrators and DBA's should not need to run any specific scripts or commands, the tool should do this automatically and without error. We are unable to take advantage of new features offered in 6.0 and beyond. Integration of any test tool with a business is not easy because the tool forces you to work its way rather than the tool supporting existing processes. I needed to write a VB script to translate/transpose my test scripts into the correct format for importing into , as a consequence of the tool forcing the tester to work how the tool works. Reason for choosing SpiraTeam offers more features, should we require them. Review Source TE Tom E. QA Engineer Telecommunications Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Pretty Good!" December 14, 2016 4.0 Overall, I like . There's a bunch of different ALM solutions out there. I prefer something easy of a lot of confusing functionality. SpiraTeam is somewhere in the middle. It has a good balance. I use it for keeping track of test cases, but don't use the requirements functionality. I wish we did use the Requirement functionality, but the developers I work with have a thing about NOT documenting what they are developing... In any case, I can produce the results of the test effort rather easily so the rest of the team can see where we are within the project. Some of the annoyances are the ability to produce a report and distribute to the rest of the team. With the templates that SpiraTeam provides, I would like something a lit bit different. The templates just don't provide the information that I need. I know there is a way to modify the templates, but never had time to devote to figure it out. Also, the way arranging tests in folders and then moving tests around in the folders has been difficult over the versions of SpiraTeam. I like how tests are arranged in that way. It helps keep everything organized in a good manner, but the implementation of it is not entirely perfect. test cases often get put in the wrong place and have to spend some time moving them around. My last annoyance is how test cases are copied and pasted. When pasting a test case, it places it on the top of the test case I copied, not underneath it. That bugs me more than anything. But when judging SpiraTeam as a whole, I do like the product, but it's those little interface annoyances that get in the way. Pros I like the concept of how test cases are arranged, within folders. Cons I don't like how the concept of the folders was implemented. Often times, when copying and pasting test cases, it gets placed in the wrong location. Have to spend extra time getting test cases and folders placed in the right location. Review Source Response from Inflectra December 14, 2016 Hi Tom Thanks so much for the very fair and detailed review, we appreciate the time you spent writing it. I would like to mention that in SpiraTeam v5.0 we completely overhauled the test case and test set folders in line with the issues you identified, so please try out the newest version and let us know if you have any suggestions or feedback. ML Mark L. Head of Delivery Computer Software Used the software for: 6-12 months ### "Are you in Wagile Hell?" February 15, 2019 4.0 With Spira Team we are building out our B2B and B2C solutions. We use the Planning Boards for SPrint Planning and daily stand up reference. WE use the Incidents page for tracking defects and Test Cases for Test Management. We also use Requirements for High Level Requirements, decomposing into Use Cases. We can bring in third parties as required to communicate their cards. Pros Where you are in the B2B market and have tech clients who remain Waterfall in their planning, yet you are more enlightened, this is a suitable tool. It does allow you to plan your dev trains according to iterations and project onto a scrum board. At the same time it allows you to map these cards to a set of requirements. In addition, you can plan your test cases and track defects all in the one platform. Sure, you could go down the Atlassian route, Inflectra appears to be better value for money, especially when adding modules. Cons Insufficient integrations available with market defacto standard testing tools. The training model is on a consulting model - not great for start ups and scale ups. Need more training videos dealing with the set up in situations of increasing complexity! Was advised that Inflectra is responsive to customer feedback feature requests. Have not experienced this yet, despite regular feedback. Because most teams spend so much time in the Planning Board, more investment is required to improve usability of this page. Its good, just not great yet. It would be great to restrict visibility of external users to specific pages or to specific cards, instead we have to create separate projects for these groups, which is not always ideal when inserting external groups into internal team work. Review Source OH Owen H. Analyst in Finance and Accounting Food & Beverages Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "A system with virtues and aspects to improve" April 14, 2021 4.0 The most necessary changes that Inflectra can develop in new improvements are the following: the grids can be very restrictive and do not offer the possibilities of quickly ordering the launches, in the requirements module it is where they must make more changes to increase the speed and for last I would like to see in a new version a better way to create custom reports. Pros Inflectra is a product that works satisfactorily with multiple browsers such as Chome, Opera and Firefox without presenting compatibility problems, it is very easy to manage and maintain and another positive aspect is the robust integration with AxoSoft OnTime. My recommendation is to work day by day with Inflectra SpiraTeam and request technical assistance if necessary. Also, I recommend asking Inflectra to add more features in a new release. SpiraTeam has a lot to improve, but it is on the right track. Cons There are many improvements that the Inflectra team can implement in a new update, for example, the grids, custom reports and the requirements module. SpiraTeam should implement and add more custom reporting options, improve testing functionality, and increase the speed of the requirement module. Review Source TB Tammy B. Used the software for: ### "Requirements and Test Management in one place" December 2, 2016 4.0 The primary goal of the software we were looking for was the management of requirements and testing along with a built-in traceability matrix and reports. included these at a reasonable cost. We purchased the 4.2 version and have not upgraded to the latest. We like the feature that not only maps the requirement to test case(s) but also indicates how many of the associated test cases have passed/failed. The filtering on tables for Requirements, Test Cases and Incidents is very helpful. Also like the folder and subfolder concepts to easily group system features. We have not used the Test Sets feature. We've been able to generate requirements and test reports and make some modifications. I am not a developer so this was a bit challenging and was not able to figure out how to create a report for bugs not linked to test cases. SpiraTeam does have a report showing Test Cases with associated incidents of which I was able to expand to get additional incident information other than just the ID. They have a handful of other reports as well. We used several administrative features. Adding new users and projects is fairly easy and straight forward. We configured the Incident work steps (workflow) to meet our business workflow (e.g., added Works as Designed and Close (by Design)), added some custom fields and adjusted field properties (e.g., hide, require) per the workstep. We used the email notifications feature as well. We also synchronized with Jira but abandoned this. We could not get the components to map but mostly because after trying it, we found it much easier to manage defects in one system for our internal processes. Once a bug is synchronized and written to Jira, you can only update it from Jira, not SpiraTeam. It would be nice to have a feature that lets you know when a test case should be retested because the associated bugs are fixed. Customer Service is responsive and professional. Sometimes I found answers to my questions on their Knowledge Base. Overall good experience. Really helps to see that requirements are covered by test cases and gives the ability to manage test case (pass/fail) in one place without having to use spreadsheets! Review Source SG Sudha G. QA Manager Used the software for: ### "Spira Feedback" October 17, 2014 4.0 Spira is a very good QA tool. It is very easy to use and very nice documents to follow. Very affordable price. Very good customer service. I am very happy using this tool and pleased with the customer service quick responses. However, here are some of the improvements and enhancement suggestions. 1. Is this compatible to use in all the browsers. Currently, if I am using chrome, when I try to edit the test case there is no way of saving. Save button is disabled. Update button is not displaying on the edited step. Today I started using IE to see if it will work better. Any ideas on that which browser it works well or is it properly tested to use in all browsers? 2. If working on a test script or projects using Spira, user accidently deletes the test case, is there a way that we can restore the data? Any history to bring back the deleted test case? If this is not there now, I request to add as a future enhancement to benefit. 3. Why do we need in Test cases also Execute button and in Test Sets also Execute button? It is very confusing. Usually it should be in Test Sets. 4. Axosoft and Spira test documents can be clearer to understand from a QA tester perspective. 5. I am still learning and trying to experiment the full features. Thanks. Review Source Response from Inflectra October 20, 2014 Hi Sudha Thanks for the positive feedback. I think you have some questions as well as the review. For questions 1-5 I would submit a help desk ticket to us (if you have not already). In answer to the questions for anyone reading: 1) Spira works with all versions of Firefox, Safari, Chrome and Opera as well as IE8 or later. 2) If you delete a test case, simply go to Administration > Project History Changes and you can revert the delete. 3) You can execute a test case or a test set because sometimes smaller teams don't want to use the test set functionality and just assign test cases directly. For larger teams, test sets are optimal. 4) Thanks for the feedback, the integration with AxoSoft OnTime is an integration feature and is definitely more technical than the rest of the system. KD Kevin D. Quality Assurance Team Lead Food Production Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Great product for managing software testing at a great price." December 2, 2016 5.0 has been a great tool for meeting our Software Quality Testing goals. We use Planning to track our business requirements and trace them to our test cases. We use the Testing section to capture all our test cases and record our test runs. We have started to use the Rapise Test Automation Tool to integrate with SpiraTeam and run our test automation scripts. We use Tracking to document all our test failures and track incidents for our projects. The Dashboard and Reporting sections have been valuable in communicating test progress and results to our project teams. We have been very pleased with the tools use and performance. Pros All the functionality needed for our Software Quality Testing goals at a great price. Cons Reporting could be easier to manage and sorting columns by "not" would be valuable - ex. Status = "not" Accepted for Requirements. Review Source VR Verified Reviewer Vice President, Training and Operational Excellence Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Have used SpiraTeam for several years and find the product features getting very rich." April 24, 2018 5.0 Being able to demonstrate application lifecycle management in one application regardless of the framework of choice! Pros Recently, I used some of its custom reporting functionality and was amazed at the easy interface and the out-of-the-box functionality. Very good. Cons At this point, I can't think of anything as they have a good roadmap, webinars, and user groups that support most of the immediate questions I have had. Review Source MW Michael W. Director Project Management Used the software for: ### "We are using Spirateam / Spiratest for test case management and for managing our testing workforce. " May 5, 2009 4.0 We are using / Spiratest for test case management and for managing our testing workforce. Also we are using it to track test case execution. -> This is where I can recommend the tool to others Whatever question we had was answered by Inflectra customer service in a timely and competent way. As a software company ourselves I was very much impressed. -> This is a major reason to go and invest into Inflectra software. The money spent is worth every cent. We cannot use the integrated ticketing tool and unfortunately were not able to integrate with our Jira ticketing solution the way we planned. The promoted Jira interface was a major reason to select Spiratest and we were very disappointed that it does not really work. However this feature is promised for a later release 2009. -> We are hoping that Jira integration will be improved and integrated into the admin interface by the Spira development team as promised end of 2008. Pros \- world class customer service - product is still improved and enhanced - cost/feature ratio is ok - helps us to improve software development process - we are using the Excel importer often also to create new testcases. This is really fast. - direct access to the MSSQL databaes allows custom report generation Cons \- Jira integration is not really working - Jira integration is only done with cryptic configuration files and not using the web-admin interface. - doesn't work well with Firefox browsers - doesn't work under Linux - test case creation using the web-gui is kind of time consuming - reporting could be more configurable directly in Spiratest Review Source KC Kristin C. Director of QA Used the software for: ### "SpiraTeam Review" October 14, 2014 3.0 Overall, the product is a great value. There are definitely things that can be improved though. \* Make reporting easier to use and more flexible. One of our number 1 complaints from Managers that use the system including myself is that we can't easily get data out of the system. \* Make it easier to create custom reports. \* The testing functionality is still cumbersome. We have seen our testing times increase fairly significantly since we started using the product. While some of that was expected, the tool is slow and not very efficient in some cases. For example instead of allowing multiple modules to be added at one time, the testers have to search for each one separately. \* The requirements module is slow. \* Performance of the product overall could be improved. \* Grids are restrictive. I have gotten lots of feedback with people wanting the ability to do things like double sort the grids or multiselecting certain fields like release. \* The customer service is fantastic but the reason I didn't give it an outstanding score is because I wish we had more say with enhancements. I wish we could pay you for an enhancement that was really important to us or for you to create a report for us. Review Source Response from Inflectra October 14, 2014 We appreciate the feedback. Reporting is one of those areas where we have added significant new capabilities but users always want to slice and dice things in different ways. The custom reporting added in v4.1 has helped by allowing users to create their own reports and we shall be adding more custom graphs in future version. For enhancements we have 5000+ customers so sadly we do have to make decisions about priority, which is one challenge with a tool that is designed to be used by large numbers of customers that have their own processes... DS Dieter S. Software Engineer Industrial Automation Used the software for: 2+ years ### "You get more than you pay for SPIRATeam - easy to use - get better from update to update" May 19, 2017 3.0 \- Great overview over the project progress - Easy administration effort Pros \- easy administration - traceability over the whole development process - good test integration - integrated dokument versioning - good and fast support Cons \- external test tool integration arn´t freeware anymore - text editor for inputs arn´t so good like in other tools Review Source NG Neethu G. Manager, QA and Validation Hospital & Health Care Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Great product for the Quality Team" April 7, 2021 5.0 Pros I have been using this product for almost 10years for my quality team. I really like the product; it is very easy to use, very easy to track team's performance , easy to do requirement traceability ,easy to assign tasks for the team. Overall a great product. Cons I am satisfied with the features I am using. Review Source DT Don T. Test Manager Used the software for: ### "High Functionality, Low Price & Responsive Support - It's a Winner!" January 28, 2010 5.0 Highly recommended. Cannot be beaten for functionality and support at the price point. And I've looked at many, with over 10 years experience with the big boys !!! Throw away those Word documents and Excel spreadsheets. At this price you can afford this top class software. You'll wonder why you made do with anything less!! And there is a free 30 day trial. That's how we got hooked. Pros Functionality, Price and Support. What more do you need in a Test Management Tool? And it has integration with other tools and test automation. was trialled over three major projects and was enthusiastically accepted by both the IT group and the Business Areas doing UAT with absolutely minimal training. SpiraTeam provides a high level of functionality at an extremely affordable price point. I was extremely pleased with the responsiveness of Inflectra to every issue and suggestion I raised. When you're sitting in a meeting with SpiraTeam users discussing incident reports from one of the trial projects, and the Director turns to you and says..."give me the quote...we need SpiraTeam" you know the product is doing the job for both test process improvement and management reporting. A winner for all !! Cons Oracle support (but it is on the way). Greater email support ( such as broadcast notification to all users)- but that is on the way too. Review Source David B. Test Manager Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "SpiraTeam and Inflectra great alround value" May 26, 2016 5.0 Very intuitive and easy to use application with custom role based access that suites any organisation. We have run the in-house version for over four years now and nothing much to complain about and when we've had a problem the support has been fantastic. We don't use the application to its fullest potential but extensively for test management and reporting. Pros Ease of use, no client installations, supports the main browser flora, a multitude of plugins for integration with other systems. Configuration flexibility. Plenty of features to grow in to. Fantastic support team and a vendor that listens to the user base addapting and improving the application at every new release. Very reasonable licensing and support fees. Cons I can only think of one drawback that is MS platform dependancy for the server installation and db. Review Source Response from Inflectra May 31, 2016 Thanks David AD Ambrish D. Manager Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Its an awesome prodect from Inflectra for overall project management . Customer support is excellent" June 14, 2018 4.0 Pros Nice features,integration with most of the automation tools,ease of navigation,easy to understand UI,tracking of tasks,version control,access as per roles,easy tracking of all artifacts and easy to understand the mappings with them. Cons Reporting can be much better.Sometimes some formats throw error while reporting,mostly detailed incident reports fail while attaching images other than jpeg formats. Review Source BG Boris G. QA Director Computer & Network Security Used the software for: 2+ years ### "SpiraTeam, great potentials, good feature set and excellent support team" December 2, 2016 4.0 I believe the fact that I bringing with me the to the third company I am working for, speaks for itself. In my current company, I was able to replace Jenkins and TestRail with the SpiraTeam. Eliminating an extra tool is always great news for the companies, thank you SpiraTeam! Pros Great variety of plugins Cons Limitations for some integrations, Jenkins will be a good example for that. Review Source Response from Inflectra December 2, 2016 Thanks Boris, we have the page rendering speed, firmly in our sights for the next version. LG Lawrence G. Testing Manager Used the software for: ### "Great feature set at any price - yet at the best price!" December 11, 2009 5.0 from Inflectra was inexpensive enough for us to use when our QA efforts were first launching as well as feature rich enough now that we have dozens of testers, analysts, and developers involved. We plan to bring on a test automation tool next year (QuickTest Pro, SmarteScript, or TestComplete) and SpiraTeam came with the hooks built in. In fact, SpiraTeam has a number of extra features built in that may make it even more useful to us over time; such as Project & Requirements Management. Their sales and support team have been invaluable in helping us understand how to use their software and even how to best test our software as well. They are flexible and very fast to respond (even after we bought) Their pricing model makes sense for the initial purchase and the annual maintenance. Simply put, Im sold. Its too tough to justify a competing product, no matter how popular, at tens of thousands of dollars more. Pros is an incredible value. Its feature set rivals competitors that are literally 10 times the cost. It has provided all the test case management that we need & the sales/support team has been immediately responsive to every question we've had. Cons The only challenge we've had with is the "team" part. It isn't quite as graceful as we'd like for using a team of testers to execute tests. They came up with a solution so it's not a show stopper but I hope it improves with the next release. Review Source Rosaria S. Web Designer Marketing and Advertising Used the software for: Less than 6 months ### "Tiri un SpiraTeam di sollievo" November 10, 2022 4.0 Complessivamente utile e dinamico Pros Ho iniziato a usare questo software durante un breve corso aziendale. È abbastanza facile scrivere i vari step dei macroscenari, una volta individuati Cons Il nuovo aggiornamento ha cambiato radicalmente la dashboard e quindi ci vuole un attimo per trovare le informazioni che si cercano Review Source CW Christine W. Director of Engineering Used the software for: ### "I don't know what you mean" January 21, 2010 2.0 Gather project mgmt design specs to your program and you will have a killer app---with integration between project management, bug tracking, and QA. Pros Integration with bug tracking and testing. Cons It was slow. Clunky interface. You seriously need to consult an agile expert, and implement better project management capability. Need person based detail, assign two engineers to one task, dashboard where you can choose multiple reports for multiple projects display, group tasks under user story/spec--heirarchy, input hours worked per day (auto accumulation instead of manual), and hours left to do estimate, needs better reporting for project managers, drag and drop tasks to iterations, drag and drop work order (your priority field is REALLY criticality---priority is work order. Progress bar should update automatically with hours worked over hours estimated. Review Source Response from Inflectra January 22, 2010 We are aware of some of the additional features such as time tracking and enhanced personnel resource tracking that are already planned for future versions. The ability to drag and drop tasks to iterations does exist (we worked with Christine to show her that feature) and the % complete is deliberately not associated to # hours expended as that is a misleading metric if a task was under-estimated to begin with. MK Martin K. Quality Assurance Manager Information Technology and Services Used the software for: I used a free trial ### "Facilitates the daily work" February 23, 2021 4.0 is used to manage the test cases of five different development languages and more than fifteen different base products. The overview of all products is elementary and is very well solved in SpiraTeam. The selection of connectable test software is very good. Pros is clear and intuitive to use. The cockpits are a good starting point for daily work. Cons The structure of the requirements is not transferred from DevOps and after grouping the original types are lost. Review Source Response from Inflectra February 26, 2021 We are looking to add a way to keep the requirement types from ADO once the requirements are nested and grouped in the SpiraTeam hierarchy. KT Kevin T. Used the software for: ### "Excellent package, it helped improve our internal processes" October 26, 2013 5.0 We migrated from OnTime to and couldn't be happier. For us, the power of SpiraTeam is the way it ties everything together. It also clear visibility of things like: This release includes these features and addresses these defects, and these test cases were executed. it is clear what is being included in each release, and it improves communication between our project managers and the developers. We have three testers, and they use the testing features of SpiraTeam both in concert with an automated tool (TestComplete) and for manual testing. We recently hired a junior tester to do manual testing, guided by the test scripts created in SpiraTeam by our lead tester. Our developers have been asking for a Kanban board, which is not currently available. It is coming, accounting to Inflectra's support. Speaking of support, we've been happy with the results the few times we have needed to call. These days it is relatively unusual to call a company and have your call answered by a real live person, a person who has a detailed understanding of the product, and who has a full command of the English language. We are hosting the application ourselves. Setup was easy, and the performance is excellent. We looked at a lot of products in this space, from open source to very expensive. SpiraTeam was the best choice for us, and we've never regretted the purchase. Review Source David B. Test Manager Used the software for: ### "Top Marks " January 6, 2011 5.0 I've looked at several applications in this segment and this comes out tops so far no doubt about it. If you've never had an ALM before or even a test management tool then you just can't lose. I'm expecting an ROI in man hours the first year of ownership not to mention the lift it will give to our working process along with job satisfaction for all our users. Pros Total value for money, a customer service second to none, this is a vendor with the customer in focus. The application is very intuitive and meets all our current needs with plenty of room for growing. Cons None so far Review Source JD John D. Principal project consultant and test manager Health, Wellness and Fitness Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Great value and great support" September 11, 2017 4.0 Pros Feature set for the price compared to competing products. Flexible licensing. Very good support from the company. Cons Very occasionally can be slow, for no apparent reason. Validation against AD can be difficult to setup. Review Source Peter B. Used the software for: 2+ years ### "null" February 2, 2017 5.0 Review Source G Galina Used the software for: ### "Easy to use ALM tool at an affordable price" April 29, 2013 5.0 We’ve been using for test management for almost a year and already implemented 2 projects with it. User experience is great, since SpiraTeam is a lightweight tool and we hadn’t had any experience with such a tool before adopting SpiraTeam. The most value it adds to our test management process and to the company in general is that all test cases and test results are stored in a single repository, both manual and automated, and it is very easy to organize and find test cases or retrieve test results using filters. We find particularly useful the options for test case re-use (linked test cases), separating test cases from test data (parameters), using test sets as containers for test cases, and using custom fields. We are eager to also adopt the other modules, especially incident management and requirements management, to benefit from the traceability between all the different artifacts we manage. And yes, it is very important that all of this comes at an affordable price with really exclusive customer support - we purchased the Enterprise Edition and have no problems whatsoever with the number of concurrent users. We expect future releases of SpiraTeam to include customizable workflows for the other artifacts, not only for incidents, as well as enhanced search. Review Source ## Send me user reviews about this product ### Fill out the form and we'll send a list of the top-rated software based on real user reviews directly to your inbox. Talk to a Capterra advisor for free and get results within 15 minutes.