Capterra Logo
Helping businesses choose better software since 1999

Bgraphic

1.0 (1)
Capterra offers objective, independent research and verified user reviews. We may earn a referral fee when you visit a vendor through our links.
Finance & Accounting 1 reviewers
100%
No Data to ShowReviewers haven't reported cost data for this provider yet
Ross G.President
Overall Rating
1.0
Communication
2.0
Responsiveness
2.0
Accuracy of Timeline
Not rated
Expertise
1.0
Value for Money
1.0
Accuracy of Cost Estimates
Not rated

I posted my original review after Betsy begged me to post a review because she received a very poor review from another client. After having significant problems with the back-end development of the site I had to discard all of that work and rebuild the site from ground zero. However, I maintained the graphic design in its original state. Therefore, I believe an updated review is in order. Recently, the site was completely rebuilt. The letter below was summarily rejected by Betsy. So, I am posting it verbatim......buyer beware. Good morning Betsy, As you know, I have experienced two occasions where my website was offline for months without my knowledge. As a result, I have had to employ other consultants to research and bring the site back online. In addition, the links to the clips continuously broke. This look, where clips do not work, promoted a feeble perception to the person reading the site and resulted in a poor perception of me as a professional. I had complained to you before that with my limited ability to see, WP was a mess. I asked you several times to clean it up..which you said you did...but on further review by these professionals, they saw many unrelated pieces in WP that were also available for outsiders to see that had no relationship with my messaging and gave unwanted opportunities to other sites to communicate with my site. Finally, within your development architecture, there was no consideration given to installing any security or notification measures that would provide protection and warnings against unwanted events from occurring. Your source in India does not have adequate skills to work for you. It is also clear that you have no technical quality control to ensure that you are delivering a site built for today. Shuffling e-mails from your designer to your client and from your developer to your client has nothing to do with delivering a solid product since you are doing nothing to add to the solution. It took months for me to understand and engage a consultant that could build a reliable site...another embarrassment since I could not direct prospects to my website during the timeframe for the research and rebuild. I have paid a high price for incompetent site development work. However, I will distinguish that from the graphic design (including text), presently retained in its original form. I had to take action, and I engaged services to bring the site back online and then completely redesign the development into a simple, swift, reliable site rhonig.com. The attached spreadsheet and supporting documents show that I paid AWS $2,266 to mitigate the problems and rebuild the site. Thus, I paid you approximately $1,600 without regard to the cost that I incurred for the months the site was offline and while online the shabby perception the malfunctioning site had on the readers and therefore their perception of me. So, bottom line, I am willing to pay for the graphic design at the cost of $800. For the remaining $800, I expect to receive a refund sent to me by Venmo by Friday, September 10, 2021. Please keep in mind; I am absorbing $622 ($1,600 + $622 = $2,266) without regard to the other costs which I incurred. Should I not receive that money on time, I will publish this letter in as many avenues for review that I can find. I will begin that effort over this coming weekend. I will look forward to receiving the $800 and putting this entire debacle to rest. Thank you, RossSeptember 13, 2021

https://bgraphic.net

Plano, TX

Founded 1993

11-50 Employees


Full-service web design company based in Dallas, Texas

Founded in 1992, Bgraphic is a web design business in Dallas, Texas, offering graphic design and creating websites for business and promotion. They listen to companies and tailor their marketing strategy accordingly. Bgraphic's creative solutions integrate all aspects of communications to provide comprehensive solutions for their clients. Their graphic and print design services help businesses communicate their messages effectively through logos, corporate identity, brochures, publications cards, and banners. They provide various internet marketing services, including social media, email campaigns, copywriting, and content creation. BGraphic's designers and developers are notable in website development, mobile applications, e-commerce, hosting, ADA compliance, and WordPress. They assist businesses with technical writing, quiz and exam questions, and media development, including photography, video production, or animation. Moreover, they develop custom e-learning modules based on fresh ideas.

Expertise


Costs

Project CostProjects Starting at:
$1K each
1 reviewer reported project cost for this provider
Less than $1K
$1K - $2.5K
100%
$2.5K - $5K
$5K - $10K
$10K+
No cost reported
Retainer CostRetainers Starting at:
Less than $500 monthly
0 reviewers reported retainer cost for this provider
$250 - $500
$500 - $1K
$1K - $2K
$2K - $5K
$5K+
No cost reported
100%

Bgraphic Reviews

Overall Rating

1.0

1 Reviews

Expertise
1.0
Value for Money
1.0
Accuracy of Cost Estimates
Not rated
Communication
2.0
Responsiveness
2.0
Accuracy of Timeline
Not rated

1 review

Ross G.
President
Accounting, 51-200 employees

Overall Rating
1.0
Reviewer Source
Source: UpCity
September 13, 2021
Frequency: Single Project
Cost Per Project: $1,000 - $2,499
Overall Experience: I posted my original review after Betsy begged me to post a review because she received a very poor review from another client. After having significant problems with the back-end development of the site I had to discard all of that work and rebuild the site from ground zero. However, I maintained the graphic design in its original state. Therefore, I believe an updated review is in order. Recently, the site was completely rebuilt. The letter below was summarily rejected by Betsy. So, I am posting it verbatim......buyer beware. Good morning Betsy, As you know, I have experienced two occasions where my website was offline for months without my knowledge. As a result, I have had to employ other consultants to research and bring the site back online. In addition, the links to the clips continuously broke. This look, where clips do not work, promoted a feeble perception to the person reading the site and resulted in a poor perception of me as a professional. I had complained to you before that with my limited ability to see, WP was a mess. I asked you several times to clean it up..which you said you did...but on further review by these professionals, they saw many unrelated pieces in WP that were also available for outsiders to see that had no relationship with my messaging and gave unwanted opportunities to other sites to communicate with my site. Finally, within your development architecture, there was no consideration given to installing any security or notification measures that would provide protection and warnings against unwanted events from occurring. Your source in India does not have adequate skills to work for you. It is also clear that you have no technical quality control to ensure that you are delivering a site built for today. Shuffling e-mails from your designer to your client and from your developer to your client has nothing to do with delivering a solid product since you are doing nothing to add to the solution. It took months for me to understand and engage a consultant that could build a reliable site...another embarrassment since I could not direct prospects to my website during the timeframe for the research and rebuild. I have paid a high price for incompetent site development work. However, I will distinguish that from the graphic design (including text), presently retained in its original form. I had to take action, and I engaged services to bring the site back online and then completely redesign the development into a simple, swift, reliable site rhonig.com. The attached spreadsheet and supporting documents show that I paid AWS $2,266 to mitigate the problems and rebuild the site. Thus, I paid you approximately $1,600 without regard to the cost that I incurred for the months the site was offline and while online the shabby perception the malfunctioning site had on the readers and therefore their perception of me. So, bottom line, I am willing to pay for the graphic design at the cost of $800. For the remaining $800, I expect to receive a refund sent to me by Venmo by Friday, September 10, 2021. Please keep in mind; I am absorbing $622 ($1,600 + $622 = $2,266) without regard to the other costs which I incurred. Should I not receive that money on time, I will publish this letter in as many avenues for review that I can find. I will begin that effort over this coming weekend. I will look forward to receiving the $800 and putting this entire debacle to rest. Thank you, Ross
Other Contributing Factors: Technical Expertise, Portfolio, Cost

Locations

Headquarters:
Plano, TX
US U.S. Locations (1)
  • Dallas